mll Posted November 21, 2022 Share Posted November 21, 2022 14 hours ago, hockeygod77 said: canucks could of picked newhook who did they take instead.. Podkolzin. Canucks had 10th overall and Newhook went 16th overall that draft year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drakrami Posted November 21, 2022 Share Posted November 21, 2022 7 hours ago, cuporbust said: Pretty sure we've tried these exact same projects out a few times no? Canucks fans just drool at adding more and more players without the revelant concept of roster size and the importance of ice time allocation to a young player's development nor the slightest hint that if a player has been bounced around a few teams already that has taken a good look at them and released them, there is a good chance they are not good players. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted November 21, 2022 Share Posted November 21, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, Drakrami said: Canucks fans just drool at adding more and more players without the revelant concept of roster size and the importance of ice time allocation to a young player's development nor the slightest hint that if a player has been bounced around a few teams already that has taken a good look at them and released them, there is a good chance they are not good players. If you were to actually read the post this was in response to, it addressed this very concept... My entire premises for claiming Jost was I didn't feel Hoglander nor Podkolzin were brining enough positive to the team this year. I would rather them playing huge minutes and thrive in the AHL and play Jost in their stead, to avoid them soaking in the stink that is our team this year. I even said Jost hasn't worked out, but there was no harm in taking a flyer on him to allow our young players the best chance at development. Since it's clearly not happening on this team on the press box or 4th line. But if you'd rather 2 of the more important prospects in our barren prospect pool wasting away in the press box or a limited role while 28 year old tweener Dries anchors the 3rd line with Boesers, who's value we are actively trying to raise, by all means continue to criticize me about my awareness. Edited November 21, 2022 by Shayster007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westcoastcanucks777 Posted November 21, 2022 Share Posted November 21, 2022 This is Bennings fault 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comeback_Kings Posted November 21, 2022 Share Posted November 21, 2022 On 11/19/2022 at 11:04 AM, -Vintage Canuck- said: Buffalo has plenty of cap space, maybe they'd trade for Boeser and reunite the Jost Boeser show? https://www.grandforksherald.com/sports/jost-boeser-come-through-as-und-beats-omaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NHL'er Posted November 22, 2022 Share Posted November 22, 2022 4 hours ago, Comeback_Kings said: Buffalo has plenty of cap space, maybe they'd trade for Boeser and reunite the Jost Boeser show? https://www.grandforksherald.com/sports/jost-boeser-come-through-as-und-beats-omaha Make a trade for Boeser because of a waiver pickup? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comeback_Kings Posted November 22, 2022 Share Posted November 22, 2022 4 hours ago, NHL'er said: Make a trade for Boeser because of a waiver pickup? well if your gonna go for it with said waiver pickup, just saying, why not keep going, Brock Boeser to Buffalo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cuporbust Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 On 11/21/2022 at 2:22 AM, Shayster007 said: So just because something hasn't worked in the past, that means you shouldn't try it again? I really don't know the point you're trying to make here. Yes. That is exactly what I'm saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 On 11/21/2022 at 7:32 PM, NHL'er said: Make a trade for Boeser because of a waiver pickup? Jokiharju? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, cuporbust said: Yes. That is exactly what I'm saying. Huh, well we have lost trades, no more trades. Bad draft picks, no more drafting! We have lost signings, no more signings. We have lost games, best we just not play games anymore. Great idea cup! Edited November 25, 2022 by Shayster007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goal:thecup Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 On 11/21/2022 at 6:23 AM, Drakrami said: Canucks fans just drool at adding more and more players without the revelant concept of roster size and the importance of ice time allocation to a young player's development nor the slightest hint that if a player has been bounced around a few teams already that has taken a good look at them and released them, there is a good chance they are not good players. Which fans are these droolers? Why don't they have "the revelant (sic) concept of roster size and the importance of ice time allocation to a young player's development"? Why don't they have "the slightest hint that if a player has been bounced around a few teams already that has taken a good look at them and released them, there is a good chance they are not good players"? All Canucks fans, or just the ones even more ignorant than your post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4ZZY Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 What happened to Tyson Jost? He started off quite well, and then just continued to drop... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now