Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Proposal] Boeser for Mangiapane + pick


D-Money

Recommended Posts

There have been rumblings that Flames are interested in Boeser. To do that, they’ll have to move out some salary. One guy they probably wouldn’t mind moving is Mangiapane, who has struggled this season.

 

My proposal is simple: Boeser to Flames for Mangiapane and a 2nd round pick. Here are some reasons why I think it might be a good fit:

 

- Clears $850K cap room this year and the next 2

- Recoups the 2nd they lost dumping Dickinson, which management has stated they’d like to do

- Mangiapane scored more goals than Boeser ever has last year, still decent chance he can be salvaged

- Stylistically, Mangiapane is more of a fit for Vancouver, has more speed and defensive skills, whereas Calgary wants a shooter 

- Both players get a fresh start, which Boeser especially needs

- Same term on both contracts, so doesn’t affect projections much

 

Both players are having tough years. But I think long term Mangiapane has the best shot at regaining his peak form, simply due to him having far less mileage and injuries to deal with.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, D-Money said:

There have been rumblings that Flames are interested in Boeser. To do that, they’ll have to move out some salary. One guy they probably wouldn’t mind moving is Mangiapane, who has struggled this season.

 

My proposal is simple: Boeser to Flames for Mangiapane and a 2nd round pick. Here are some reasons why I think it might be a good fit:

 

- Clears $850K cap room this year and the next 2

- Recoups the 2nd they lost dumping Dickinson, which management has stated they’d like to do

- Mangiapane scored more goals than Boeser ever has last year, still decent chance he can be salvaged

- Stylistically, Mangiapane is more of a fit for Vancouver, has more speed and defensive skills, whereas Calgary wants a shooter 

- Both players get a fresh start, which Boeser especially needs

- Same term on both contracts, so doesn’t affect projections much

 

Both players are having tough years. But I think long term Mangiapane has the best shot at regaining his peak form, simply due to him having far less mileage and injuries to deal with.

Works for me too, but I’d rather get Tanev back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VAN would have to trade Garland. Too many small players.

 

I'd hate to see Boeser in a Flames jersey or see the Flames benefit from the trade. 

 

How 'bout Garland for Mangiapane? Both guys are similar in stature, both are struggling this year.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd do Boeser for Zadorov plus a pick, frankly.  His ability to play RD and with physicality could make for a stopgap option, and hopefully by next season they would play well enough so we could flip both him and Myers as RD's who are pending UFA's for early picks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said:

I don’t agree but both are soft. 

Mangiapane at least throws some hits 

3-4x as many as Boeser this season

He's also done more with less ice time

Also blocks more shots

 

Hes obviously not what youd call a physical player but hes speedy, and isnt afraid to get into tough areas

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder if it would make sense to just trade him for Lucic and a 2nd.  We regain the 2nd we lost, Lucic gives us a Schenn like hit machine for the 4th line and it gives us the cap to either sign Bo or whatever we want with the cap next year.  Maybe even Lucic signs a 700k type deal to give us some toughness for another year.

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eeeeergh said:

Mangiapane at least throws some hits 

3-4x as many as Boeser this season

He's also done more with less ice time

Also blocks more shots

 

Hes obviously not what youd call a physical player but hes speedy, and isnt afraid to get into tough areas

 

 

Does throwing hits matter when he’s a 160-170 soaking wet. Not a player we need at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kobayashi Maru said:

Wonder if it would make sense to just trade him for Lucic and a 2nd.  We regain the 2nd we lost, Lucic gives us a Schenn like hit machine for the 4th line and it gives us the cap to either sign Bo or whatever we want with the cap next year.  Maybe even Lucic signs a 700k type deal to give us some toughness for another year.

I’d do that long before taking the smurf for him. 

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...