cripplereh Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 17 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said: All of those hoping for Bedard (myself included) - it will require great luck to land the #1. This is the Canucks we're talking about here Wishing to win the Lotto Max might be more realistic Like most years I think we will win our way out of a top 5 spot and get bumped down a spot or with the lottery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timråfan Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 31 minutes ago, grandmaster said: This new coach bump is gonna kill our chances for a top 3 pick. What a stupid time to do this…. Dancing is never stupid https://youtu.be/m_fkux6Ha9g Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putgolzin Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 If it were 2011 again - which D do you like better? Ohlund Hamhuis Ehrhoff Bieksa Ballard Salo or Gonchar Foote OEL Schenn ------ Myers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawbone Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 11 minutes ago, awalk said: If I had a 7%+ chance of winning the lotto max, I'd actually play the lotto. But you could only buy one ticket per year, so it's a looong wait between chances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awalk Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Just now, Strawbone said: But you could only buy one ticket per year, so it's a looong wait between chances. OK I'll bite, but in this hypothetical, the only other thing that I really really want in life, I have a less than 1% chance of even getting to compete for it. So I'll choose the 7% odds and lean into that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Putgolzin said: If it were 2011 again - which D do you like better? Ohlund Hamhuis Ehrhoff Bieksa Ballard Salo or Gonchar Foote OEL Schenn ------ Myers Can’t remember, was Ohlund with us in 2011? Edit he wasn’t nvm Edited January 24 by Odd. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awalk Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Putgolzin said: If it were 2011 again - which D do you like better? Ohlund Hamhuis Ehrhoff Bieksa Ballard Salo or Gonchar Foote OEL Schenn ------ Myers 2011 specifically, our group. Foote's career was pretty much over and Gonchar was on the decline. OEL was in his sophomore season. Our guys were really solid. Edit: it was Tanev, not Ohlund, btw Edited January 24 by awalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awalk Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 minute ago, Odd. said: Can’t remember, was Ohlund with us in 2011? No, he was on Tampa by then 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harold Drunken Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 I'm really looking forward to this team re-tooling around second chance youngsters because this team definitely has never tried that strategy........................................................................................ 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chon derry Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 4 minutes ago, Odd. said: Can’t remember, was Ohlund with us in 2011? A. Alberts * K. Ballard * K. Bieksa A. Edler M. Gragnani D. Hamhuis A. Rome S. Salo A. Sulzer C. Tanev 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taphouse Canuck Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 We're going to have to work hard to lose this one. Maybe take lots of penalties and let our PK work its magic? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rychicken Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 minute ago, chon derry said: A. Alberts * K. Ballard * K. Bieksa A. Edler M. Gragnani D. Hamhuis A. Rome S. Salo A. Sulzer C. Tanev I sure wish we had a guy like Alberts... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 7 minutes ago, chon derry said: A. Alberts * K. Ballard * K. Bieksa A. Edler M. Gragnani D. Hamhuis A. Rome S. Salo A. Sulzer C. Tanev Think gragnani and Sulzer came in the Kassian trade 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 2 hours ago, Jaimito said: A tiny bite of the elephant. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 hour ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: Need to play Martin against all the tank teams down the stretch. That will be crucial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chickenspear Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 13 minutes ago, chon derry said: A. Alberts * K. Ballard * K. Bieksa A. Edler M. Gragnani D. Hamhuis A. Rome S. Salo A. Sulzer C. Tanev Missing Ehrhoff from that list. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chon derry Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 5 minutes ago, Chickenspear said: Missing Ehrhoff from that list. Your right I quoted off cdc ? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 53 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: What worries me, is doesn't management see the problems already??? You need a coach to tell you what is wrong? Of course they do...we all do, but recognizing it and implementing it are 2 different things. We'll see if Tocchet can carry it out. Tough task considering how long this team has been playing dysfunctional hockey. I think we are looking at a 'slow start' coach bump over the next couple of months, placing the team in the double-digit picks at the draft. Hopefully they can pick up another 1st round pick in a trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdgarM Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Its going to be interesting to see who puts in the effort tonight and who remains "status quo". Its also going to be interesting to see a team without favorites and mostly rolling four lines. Would like to see if Tocchet plays the hot hands too and rewards those who are having good games with more ice time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 2 hours ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: So this is why we made the coaching change now. Bruce was doing too well against Chicago. We have all the excuses for a loss now (not enough practice time, new systems, etc) 3D chess move by management for the tank again boys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts