The Arrogant Worms Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6of1_halfdozenofother Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 Appropriate, since he's now on their team. What I'm more interested to find out is whether or not he wears a stylized Canucks-logo Pacific Division sweater at the actual ASG. And #14, eh? I wonder how he came to the decision to wear that number. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 Just now, 6of1_halfdozenofother said: Appropriate, since he's now on their team. What I'm more interested to find out is whether or not he wears a stylized Canucks-logo Pacific Division sweater at the actual ASG. And #14, eh? I wonder how he came to the decision to wear that number. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6of1_halfdozenofother Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 1 minute ago, mll said: So why not #41 then? Since the number "4" appears before "1" in that quote on both occasions. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNate Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 2 minutes ago, 6of1_halfdozenofother said: So why not #41 then? Since the number "4" appears before "1" in that quote on both occasions. Nobody wants to be #41. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 I think there's a little adburration too...maybe a secret tribute. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6of1_halfdozenofother Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 Just now, BCNate said: Nobody wants to be #41. Then why didn't they consider 82? 5+3 = 8, 5-3 = 2. (Since Romanov is wearing #28) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 21 minutes ago, 6of1_halfdozenofother said: Appropriate, since he's now on their team. What I'm more interested to find out is whether or not he wears a stylized Canucks-logo Pacific Division sweater at the actual ASG. And #14, eh? I wonder how he came to the decision to wear that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUCKER67 Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 Seeing that picture of Bo in an Islanders jersey - feels like some bad April Fool's joke. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6of1_halfdozenofother Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 3 minutes ago, AlwaysACanuckFan said: Or possibly... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmm Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 19 minutes ago, BCNate said: Nobody wants to be #41. isn't 41 the EBUG number, back up to the back up in the ECHL? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 (edited) 26 minutes ago, 6of1_halfdozenofother said: So why not #41 then? Since the number "4" appears before "1" in that quote on both occasions. Lamoriello doesn't allow high numbers (or for 13). He is all about the team and he thinks high numbers stand out too much. Cizikas had his number before he took over. Pageau was the only player that got to take a high number since he took over. Edited February 4 by mll Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmm Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 19 minutes ago, 6of1_halfdozenofother said: Then why didn't they consider 82? 5+3 = 8, 5-3 = 2. (Since Romanov is wearing #28) cuz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 Love it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 33 minutes ago, The Arrogant Worms said: Sorry Bo. That's one butt ugly uniform. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNate Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 5 minutes ago, lmm said: isn't 41 the EBUG number, back up to the back up in the ECHL? I don't know what position they play, but #41 is almost always going to be a bad player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erkayloomeh Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 41 minutes ago, 6of1_halfdozenofother said: Then why didn't they consider 82? 5+3 = 8, 5-3 = 2. (Since Romanov is wearing #28) Bo wanted us to have reason to bicker about it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 49 minutes ago, 6of1_halfdozenofother said: So why not #41 then? Since the number "4" appears before "1" in that quote on both occasions. Lou doesn't allow high numbers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sell.the.team Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 slightly confused why his wife is involved with jersey number selection.... #whipped 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinky-Winky Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 what sucks is canucks fans voted for bo without us, he mighta not of got in :O Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.