HKSR Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 To CLB: $1M retention on OEL Aidan Mcdonough To VAN: $2M retention on OEL Shakir Mukhamadullin or Kevin Bahl To NJD: OEL ($4M AAV cap hit) $5M in cap savings for the Canucks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcam Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 6 minutes ago, HKSR said: To CLB: $1M retention on OEL Aidan Mcdonough To VAN: $2M retention on OEL Shakir Mukhamadullin or Kevin Bahl To NJD: OEL ($4M AAV cap hit) $5M in cap savings for the Canucks. NJ Devils would never do this deal?? They have Luke Hughes 6'2 -19 future # 2 D also Nemec -18 -6'1 Future # 1 D man.. They don't need OEL--- NJ Devils could use offensive winger but not D men,, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 Onerously Exorbitant Lump is a hand grenade. We simply MUST pull the pin, & throw him as far away as ****ing possible. To have other GM's assist with this undertaking is whimsical fantasy.(yeah, would love to be wrong) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Coconuts Posted February 13 Popular Post Share Posted February 13 Is the reason you didn't see it coming because you were on hallucinogens when you came up with this? 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 29 minutes ago, wildcam said: NJ Devils would never do this deal?? They have Luke Hughes 6'2 -19 future # 2 D also Nemec -18 -6'1 Future # 1 D man.. They don't need OEL--- NJ Devils could use offensive winger but not D men,, Columbus wouldn’t do this either. 4+ seasons of $1m dead cap for the rights to an unsigned college player? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highstickin Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 Not sure that this is legal since there is a limit of 2 retained salary transactions per player contract. Since Arizona retained in the initial deal with Van I believe Van would be the only team eligible to retain on OEL moving forward. For the proposal to happen I think the paper trail would technically be OEL ($2M retained) to CLB from Van then OEL ($1M retained) to NJD from CLB which would make three retained transactions for OEL. Van will not be able to use another team to broker a deal involving OEL's cap hit. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 11 minutes ago, Highstickin said: Not sure that this is legal since there is a limit of 2 retained salary transactions per player contract. Since Arizona retained in the initial deal with Van I believe Van would be the only team eligible to retain on OEL moving forward. For the proposal to happen I think the paper trail would technically be OEL ($2M retained) to CLB from Van then OEL ($1M retained) to NJD from CLB which would make three retained transactions for OEL. Van will not be able to use another team to broker a deal involving OEL's cap hit. Good call Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 We might get Columbus interested, if Vancouver could somehow take back their toxic chemical explosion/eco-catastrophe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6of1_halfdozenofother Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 47 minutes ago, Highstickin said: Not sure that this is legal since there is a limit of 2 retained salary transactions per player contract. Since Arizona retained in the initial deal with Van I believe Van would be the only team eligible to retain on OEL moving forward. For the proposal to happen I think the paper trail would technically be OEL ($2M retained) to CLB from Van then OEL ($1M retained) to NJD from CLB which would make three retained transactions for OEL. Van will not be able to use another team to broker a deal involving OEL's cap hit. I came to say exactly this. It's good to see who has been doing their homework (and who hasn't *cough*OP*cough*). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 12 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said: We might get Columbus interested, if Vancouver could somehow take back their toxic chemical explosion/eco-catastrophe. LOL shorter term, lower cap hit AND RHD in Gudbranson? I'd hesitantly say "sign me up". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted February 13 Author Share Posted February 13 2 hours ago, Coconuts said: Is the reason you didn't see it coming because you were on hallucinogens when you came up with this? You don't know me!! You don't !!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 2 minutes ago, HKSR said: You don't know me!! You don't !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 The Devils are probably the last team in the league who would do this. We'd need to find some rubbish team who wants to tank to off-load him on, maybe one who's committing to rebuilding the next couple of years. Chicago's got tonnes of cap space but any team will ask for a 1st straight-up for OEL. I wonder if we pass him around and split that into a 2nd + Rathbone or Hoglander? Still not worth it, that's a lot of value to give up. My current vote is buy out OEL, take the cap penalty on the chin and just sign a UFA LD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.