AngryElf Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 (edited) This is new so I figure it deserves its own thread. Edit: Portzline is the #1 CBJ insider. Edited February 21 by AngryElf 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Me waiting for this other transaction to happen 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Last I heard was BOS was interested and the price was 3 draft picks (1st, 3rd, and 4th). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngryElf Posted February 19 Author Share Posted February 19 3 minutes ago, BPA said: Last I heard was BOS was interested and the price was 3 draft picks (1st, 3rd, and 4th). Sounds like either Boston or Edmonton, but neither team currently has cap space. I would love to take on a cap dump for a decent pick. Boston gets a 6th for Smith and a second, or we get Puljujarvi and a second, and retain on Gavrikov? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 7 minutes ago, BPA said: Last I heard was BOS was interested and the price was 3 draft picks (1st, 3rd, and 4th). Could be, I'm intrigued in what other transaction has to happen first, is it the Motte trade? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Just now, AngryElf said: Sounds like either Boston or Edmonton, but neither team currently has cap space. I would love to take on a cap dump for a decent pick. Boston gets a 6th for Smith and a second, or we get Puljujarvi and a second, and retain on Gavrikov? Kings maybe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngryElf Posted February 19 Author Share Posted February 19 4 minutes ago, AlwaysACanuckFan said: Kings maybe? We wouldn’t be involved then, they would need to get a taker for Cal Peterson and that contract is too long for us. It would make sense why CBJ isn’t involved in him as a cap dump with their goalie depth. Anderson - Doughty Gavrikov - Durzi Bjornfot - Roy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6of1_halfdozenofother Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 (edited) 6 minutes ago, AlwaysACanuckFan said: Could be, I'm intrigued in what other transaction has to happen first, is it the Motte trade? Maybe the two teams are still trying to figure out who to launder the money player's cap hit through first? (Edit - and by "who", I mean "which team") Edited February 19 by 6of1_halfdozenofother Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngryElf Posted February 19 Author Share Posted February 19 7 minutes ago, AlwaysACanuckFan said: Could be, I'm intrigued in what other transaction has to happen first, is it the Motte trade? Nope, Motte to NYR for Gauthier and a conditional 7th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 12 minutes ago, AngryElf said: Sounds like either Boston or Edmonton, but neither team currently has cap space. I would love to take on a cap dump for a decent pick. Boston gets a 6th for Smith and a second, or we get Puljujarvi and a second, and retain on Gavrikov? Boston could easily take on Gavrikov if Columbus retained 50% and also took on Mike Reilly's contract. The ask is probably too high as they would want more picks for the retention and taking Reilly's contract. I suspect it is Edmonton who is all in and they need to move some money out first... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 8 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said: Boston could easily take on Gavrikov if Columbus retained 50% and also took on Mike Reilly's contract. The ask is probably too high as they would want more picks for the retention and taking Reilly's contract. I suspect it is Edmonton who is all in and they need to move some money out first... That would sure make the Boston D a frightening bunch. Tough, rough and deep. I think the problem for the Bruins is that the Jackets want a 1st, but probably not the 32nd overall I can see them taking a stab at acquiring Lysell. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 (edited) I mean LA would make sense no? They were close to acquiring Chychrun before the deal fell apart. Gavrikov is a cheaper option for them. Edited February 19 by DeNiro 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 3 minutes ago, DeNiro said: I mean LA would make sense no? They were close to acquiring Chychrun before the deal fell apart. Gavrikov is a cheaper option for them. They certainly wouldn't have to give up Brandt or Byfield for him, or at least id hope not 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 4 minutes ago, DeNiro said: I mean LA would make sense no? They were close to acquiring Chychrun before the deal fell apart. Gavrikov is a cheaper option for them. Yes, however they have the cap space to take on Gavrikov, so not sure what the hold up would be for another transaction to take place. Unless they are working on multiple deals and want to move Cal Petersen... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 2 minutes ago, stawns said: They certainly wouldn't have to give up Brandt or Byfield for him, or at least id hope not I'm pretty sure that trade involving Byfield for Chychrun was true and LA backed out at the last minute... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 4 minutes ago, DeNiro said: I mean LA would make sense no? They were close to acquiring Chychrun before the deal fell apart. Gavrikov is a cheaper option for them. Wouldn't think so - LA not really going after rentals as they are not contenders just yet. CBJ tried to extend him but he's asking for far too much and LA has to be mindful of cap + he apparently also wants to test free agency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 5 minutes ago, stawns said: They certainly wouldn't have to give up Brandt or Byfield for him, or at least id hope not They aren't even available for Chychrun. Per Friedman they made it clear internally and externally that neither of them are available. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 1 minute ago, mll said: Wouldn't think so - LA not really going after rentals as they are not contenders just yet. CBJ tried to extend him but he's asking for far too much and LA has to be mindful of cap + he apparently also wants to test free agency. I’d be asking for alot to stay in Columbus too. I’m pretty sure he’d be willing to sign in LA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Just now, DeNiro said: I’d be asking for alot to stay in Columbus too. I’m pretty sure he’d be willing to sign in LA. Chychrun still the target though - age fit/cap fit. Arizona is going to be left with no one to trade him to if they don't lower their ask and other teams move on to their B option. He's already missed 4 games - are they really just going to keep him if no one pays up. LA can wait because they don't really see themselves as contenders just yet while Boston or Edmonton etc are going for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.