Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

(Discussion) keep Judy


Recommended Posts

Garland is pretty good. He fits our mold. He’s an aggregator. He is aggressive and causes the other team to have a penalty against him(us). Fits our cap 4.5 for medium type player. Has good enough points for playing on the third line most nights and 2nd pp. I say we keep him.

what do u think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a glut of young RW's with top 9 potential that are going to be pushing for spots in the next couple of years. Podkolzin, Kratsov, Klimovich, Karlsson, Lekkerimaki, not to mention Brock and Mikheyev. Something's gotta give. I think finding new homes for both Garland and Boeser is the right path forward for the team. 

  • There it is 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Crabcakes said:

Aggregator?  Like a kind of website?

Agitator, I think.  Conor draws a lot of penalties (if the PP were any good, it would be a big +) and he is an

energy guy.  He's good at fetching the puck and keeping it in the Ozone.  At this point, I would prefer to keep

Gar over Boeser.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said:

We have a glut of young RW's with top 9 potential that are going to be pushing for spots in the next couple of years. Podkolzin, Kratsov, Klimovich, Karlsson, Lekkerimaki, not to mention Brock and Mikheyev. Something's gotta give. I think finding new homes for both Garland and Boeser is the right path forward for the team. 

Good point. But Podkolzin is the only one who is proven on your list. The rest can fight over 4th line minutes to start. And I do like pods on the 3rd line. Give him 2nd pp minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Paul-walker said:

Good point. But Podkolzin is the only one who is proven on your list. The rest can fight over 4th line minutes to start. And I do like pods on the 3rd line. Give him 2nd pp minutes.

We're not going to be contending any time soon. Best to shed the salary and get the younger guys some ice time. They won't all pan out, but I imagine a couple of them will, and by opening up spots on the roster we'll be giving them the opportunity to do so, not to mention we'll be shedding salary and getting more picks/prospects in return. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...