nuck in cow town

Is that you Trevor? You come off all sanctimonious like your word is gospel. I came on to offer a what if, just hypothetical, not the spoken word. These forums are for all to use as I see you just waiting, lurking to give your morning diatribe. I'm the lucky one today I suppose. Now we can all go amongst our business now that we've been educated by someone who averages 138 posts a week, seriously! That makes you the man & me the student doesn't it, get a life! What do you do in your spare time, hunt bunnies? People come on because we like our Canucks but people like you with small minds & small ideas will never see tomorrow for what it is, you're just busy living in the past. Now I'm going to sign off this silly CDC thing as someone of your calibre has scared me back into my moms basement. Bring on your calculated response however, let it be said I gave you your chance to shine today! You're probably dancing around your basement naked singing to the Village People thinking "boy I sure got that guy". Imagine that, me living in my past with a reference to 1978... now go live in yours & enjoy. Just think of how much education you have coming!

Had we had Trevor in the roll of GM last year for the draft and he was still of the mindset about size we would have firstly received more for Schneider. Anyway, you would probably be looking at Nicushkin taken by us @ 9 instead of Horvat, and this year instead of looking at Ritchie for our size fix we could take Nylander. So my question is then, who would you rather have as our two picks? Horvat / Ritchie or Nicushkin / Nylander I like the second one as I think it has more offensive talent but time will tell. Points may prove me wrong at the moment but who can argue with Nicushkin's production playing along side Benn & Seguin. Would we have realized the Sedin slide with Nicushkin playing along side the Sedins all year?