Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Enter Search Term. Use arrows to navigate between autocomplete results. If no results appear, use Enter to do a full site search.
Forum Closure ×
Canucks Community
Forum Closure
  • entries
    43
  • comments
    109
  • views
    15,230

The Comeback Kids Save Luongo... Again

Mozy

Entry posted by Mozy

356 views

 Share

The comeback kids have done it again. The Canucks now lead the league with their 10th 3rd period come from behind win after Samuelsson's 2nd period hat trick helped them stage a 6-4 win in a big NW division tilt. It's reached a stage where the Canucks level of confidence is so high that they can give up the first goal in nearly every game, they can give up a multi goal lead, and still fight back.

The first time around you could argue that maybe it's a fluke, and while I'm not suggesting that this is some sort of strategy, it's certainly something that doesn't phase them. After overcoming two 3-goal deficits in the game to win 6-4 and stun the Avalanche at the Pepsi Center, a lot of people get completely caught up in the win and neglect to look at the most important part of the game which isn't the comeback so much as it is the start.

The Sedins are coming alive at the right time (if their play in the last few games is any indication of comeback) but Luongo's play has to be addressed. It's alright to let in one soft goal here or there, the best goalies do it at the worst of times. Luongo however seems to be making it a habit though. The worst part is although he's coughing up early leads, because the Canucks are coming back his shoddy first period play is going unnoticed. While I agree with Vigneault when he says "You never critique a win" you can't give Luongo a free pass.

Luongo allowed more than one soft goal today and you can't blame the defense as much as we've started to do. He's paid the big dollars to put up the big saves. Of course many people will point to his stellar saves in the second and third period, but the bottom line is those don't mean a thing if the Canucks aren't still in the game, and his weak goaltending in the first detracts from just how well he played in that second and third period.

At this point in the season the Canucks need their highest paid players to be their best players. That goes without saying regardless of the roster station, but becomes even more important based on the current blue line injuries. The Sedins have definitely turned their game back on with their play in the last few games and Luongo really needs to shut down. This stretch drive is the tune up for the playoffs. Teams don't blow three goal leads in the playoffs and the Canucks can't expect to play the comeback game when the second season starts.

With one more game on the Canucks road trip, heading home is going to be a nice change. Raycroft's been fantastic for the Canucks on this road trip so going into tomorrow night the Canucks should be able to ride the momentum from this game to start well against a Coyotes team that is as tough as any team in the West. Luongo better use the night off to get his head together because he's been shaky in first periods since coming back from the Olympics and if he's not giving the Canucks a chance to win every night the Canucks have bigger fish to fry.

 Share

1 Comment

Recommended Comments

Hammer79

During the game you said (on twitter) that he played poorly for the past month, including during the Olympics. I have to disagree with your assessment.

Two of our top four D-men (Bieksa and Mitchell) have been out since January, and we've had Rome and Lukowich in as replacements. Lukowich has dropped off from last season with the Sharks, and Rome is only marginally better.

To top it off, we've been on a 14 game road trip with a weakened defense. Home teams come out flying usually, and road teams usually have to weather the storm in the first period. While I agree that he's let in a couple goals he'd like to have back, there are even more blown coverages that our over-played depth D-men have given up. Alberts is a stop-gap that will hold the fort until we get Mitchell back, but he's had a couple of blown coverages already in the few games he's been here.

As for Luongo's Olympic performance, what about it was there not to like? Does one bad goal against Slovakia = a bad tournament? I think most people would disagree with that. Let's see, he shut out Norway, which no one else managed to do. (VIKINGSTAD!) :lol:

He let in two against Germany after Canada had put the game out of reach and had checked out mentally and physically. The next night, he let in 3 goals against Russia, the second best offensive team (depth-wise) in the tournament. He let in 2 against Slovakia, which had enough weapons to turn that game on a dime. He still weathered the storm at the end, absolutely robbing Demitra. Remember that one?

Gold medal game, in OT, Scott Niedermayer gives the puck away to Pavelski. Pavelski has a clear break-away from the TV-right faceoff dot. Luongo stands up out of his butterfly stance and bats the puck away with his elbow, a shot on which most goalies in this league would have let in top corner. The puck gets cleared down the ice onto Miller. He steers it into the corner. Crosby and Iginla dig it out in the corner boards. The puck squirts loose from Iginla to Crosby, and he puts it away for the 'Golden Goal'. In case you missed it Mozy, that Gold-medal preserving save came approx 25 seconds before Crosby scores the winner. If Luongo doesn't make that save, we'd be dealing with 4 years of American non-hockey fans gloating in the media right now. :lol:

I think you should be focusing more on the defensive coverage during games instead of defaulting to throwing Luongo under the bus.

Link to comment

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...