[Burrows? Do We Really Need Him?]

3 minutes ago, *Buzzsaw* said:

Actually Burrows had an assist was +1 and his line was either the best Canucks line or 2nd best.  They were all over the ice and had multiple chances.

He could easily have had another assist as he set up Bartkowski for a perfect one timer middle of the ice, right between the circles 20 ft out... too bad Bartkowski can't hit the broadside of a barn door.

And besides, as others have pointed out, if you want to bitch about Burrows, there is a well established thread for that.

Right! If you watched the game it was Vey and Etem that makes the line go. Like i said do we really need burrows to score. I rather have him agitate like Marchant instead of getting an Assist.

[Burrows? Do We Really Need Him?]

8 minutes ago, Spotted Zebra said:

He should be sat a few games.

Sedin - Sedin - Sutter

Baertschi - Horvat - Hansen

Etem - Vey - Vrbata 

Dorsett - McCann - Virtanen

Sedins are fine! Somebody needs to tell our coach that is okay to mix lines when nothing is happening. 

Hansen is not working right now on the first line, they can alway put him back on after. They need light a fire under vrbata's before he gets traded

[Burrows? Do We Really Need Him?]

Burrows should be placed on waivers just like Prust. He doesn't hit or agitate anymore.  All he does is skate around.  He needs to stop thinking he's a scorer and start doing what got him in the NHL! Is time for him to move on.

[[Report] Kesler is still a Canuck]

For those of you who are happy we didn't trade Kesler because we didn't get enough for him!

Think about what happen with Luongo when what Toronto offer supposedly offer wasn't enough

Now we have a back up goalie and a journeyman!

Watch Kesler will get injured and then we will lose leveage again!

Well Done Gillis and Canucks Ownership