Philthy
-
Posts
229 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Philthy
-
-
3 minutes ago, BarnBurner said:
What a joke.
First of all, you only show up to spew your dew when there's controversy. Secondly, you have no clue about the reality of this situation.
So what are you talking about?
Enlighten us here.. let’s hear your “clue”.
-
16 minutes ago, wai_lai416 said:
i would refuse payment for additional expense too if i'm not given information regarding it. as for child support both side agreed aquilini have paid his child support up until august 2022.. they are arguing over $140k of additional expense and whether he has to continue paying them because all the information is hidden. i dunno the context of taking extended breaks from class.. i'm guessing skipping semester and so on.. so does that mean he have to continue paying them each month if they decides to skip semester drag things out and continue collecting 12.5k while on vacation? if that's the case i'm going to stay in school forever.. where else are you going to make 12.5k a month literally just for staying in school?
yes he's been fighting some payments over time but let's not go and pretend he hasn't paid his child support for years.. he's literally up to date minus the "extra" expense that haven't been explained to him yet
The perks of being born into a wealthy family.
I’m not disagreeing with you, I’m just stating that this is simply family law. Which is why he needs to make a claim to review his order. Instead he stopped making payments as of September 2021.
“She said that Francesco Aquilini had provided child support up until September 2021, but then stopped payments.”
“Every child in BC has a right to child support. Parents receive child support on behalf of the child. A parent can't refuse to pay child support simply because they don't like the other parent or don't approve of how the other parent will use the money. The law says the parent the children live with most of the time is entitled to get child support from the other parent. If the children spend equal (or almost equal) time with both parents, the person with the higher income usually has to pay child support.”
https://family.legalaid.bc.ca/finances-support/child-spousal-support/child-support
-
31 minutes ago, wai_lai416 said:
i dunno i read they agreed to only pay until they are 19.. half a million a year is enough to put any kid thru university master doctor phd.. i'm sure he paid the child support part.. it's the extra expense that he's unwilling to pay because they are unexplained and "hidden" from him to hide the kids from him?
Tali’ah’s lawyer argues she maintains her home for the children even during the school year when they are away, and Francesco should be paying the previously agreed upon $12,500 per month for each child who lives with her, year-round, until they turn 19.
After that, Francesco would only be obligated to pay the amount when the children are home from school.
Agreed to pay until their 19 is the general wording for every child support agreement.
IF the child pursues post secondary education in this case the 3 children have, he’s obligated by BC Supreme Court to continue making payments due to the access and custody of the children of mother who was granted full access. No matter what the figure is that is the law. Your opinion can’t change that which is getting in the way of actually seeing that this is the law and ruling the court in this case, the court depicts fairness regardless of the dollar figure.
He’s refusing payments due to having insufficient information on the children, baring because they have had minimal contact with him since 2013.
Edit: These two links explain it more
https://www.ylaw.ca/blog/how-to-change-a-child-support-order-in-bc/
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, wai_lai416 said:
i dunno i read the original child support is only until 19 years of age when the child are at home while studying and they were arguing he shouldn't have to pay the full amount when they are not at home with her. i mean if the original agreement was only till 19 years of age.. technically his obligation are over but he continued to pay up until august 2022 may it be lesser amount or not. 15k per child per month till they are 19 is an insane amount of child support regardless if he's rich or not.. that's almost 3-4x more than what a normal adult make in a month.. chances are FA prolly dished out some physical discipline.. a lot of countries parent still discipline their kids and is considered normal.. but i doubt it was as extreme as his kids claimed.. comes into the room to beat you till you wake up?? throwing a 5 year old across the room?? those seems exaggerated.. if i throw a 5 year old across the room.. i'm sure there'd be either some broken bones or signs of abuse on your body that people would notice.. or even requires hospital. again it may or may not be true i rather reserve my judgement till the court makes a decision rather than give death sentence based on allegations..
19 years old is the general age, keyword generally. You don’t stop paying child support because you think it’s unfair, especially when your kids are still under the existing ordered that presumably was signed at the divorce. In order to change an existing order that you feel is unjust you have to file and application and wait for a first appearance in front of a judge. Not paying is also handled by FMEP in which they can garnish wages.
Often a family case conference is called upon a judge and ruling is handled out afterwards but could be a gruelling and long process.
This is just a case of a man with an absurd amount of money being childish for not even considering to put in an order to review his existing order. Refusing to pay any court ordered payments that is been in place is just being negligent to the whole situation.
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, JoGuitar said:
Hmmm Child Support stops when kids become adults, Mom suddenly requires more money from Dad.
False, support continues when kids pursue post secondary education. Support stops once a child is no longer dependent on the parent of majority access. Support can also continue when the child has a disability or illness that leads into adulthood, till a certain age
-
1
-
-
15 minutes ago, Bitter Melon said:
Clearly every player should just be put into storage when not playing/training.
Clearly and they should wear masks and practice safe social distancing while on the ice when the NHL returns, its the only way we will ''flatten this curve.''
-
On 6/15/2020 at 7:33 PM, CBH1926 said:
Waste of roster spot, 4th line plug that brings nothing to the team,
Oh I forgot, he brings “intimidation” and keeps opposing players “in check”
Id take it for half the floaters riding the pine on this team.
-
Has Ferland been cleared to play? If so he needs to be slotted in he's shown he can be a beast in the playoffs.
-
Wonder with the loss in revenue due to the cancellation if this will affect the new projected cap.
-
3 minutes ago, rychicken said:
Stetcher will be gone cap issue or not....
I have a feeling Seattle will take him truthfully.
-
10 minutes ago, Ryan Strome said:
Actually she owns a business and is contributing but your point is valid.
Thankfully, she'd be on the hook for a lot more if she wasn't contributing..
-
45 minutes ago, Ryan Strome said:
Meanwhile people can illegally walk across the border and excessively put a burden on tax payers.
TORONTO -- A 30-year-old woman, who was brought to Toronto when she was a little girl, is facing deportation to France after federal officials learned she was living in Canada without immigration status for 18 years.
Laura Emmanuelle Souchet, a samba dancer who now owns her own cleaning business, said she came to Canada with her mother at the age of 12 to take care of her grandmother, who suffered a severe stroke.
She told CTV News Toronto that in 2002, an immigration consultant told them if they wanted to stay in Canada, they would need to apply as refugees, a notion that even puzzled Souchet as a young girl seeing as France was a safe country.
But the family trusted the consultant to know the Canadian system better than they did, and they handed over their payment, Souchet said. When the application was rejected and a deportation order was issued, the consultant advised them to go under the federal government's radar and wait for amnesty.
“I was hoping [it would work out], but I realized she was feeding me a dream that wasn’t a reality,” Souchet said on Thursday. “She was charming and convincing as if she had our best interest at heart … I was later told that she’s known for doing this kind of stuff.”
For 18 years since then, Souchet said she has lived in fear, scared that at any moment officers with the Canada Border Services Agency would come to her home, and tear her away from her friends and the life she built here in Canada.
She said that even in situations when she has felt afraid for her safety, she has not contacted police due to her fear.
“It was like living with a ton of bricks on your shoulder for 18 years,” she said.
This past November, she decided that she needed to find help. She contacted a well-known Toronto lawyer, Graciela Flores Mendez, who took up her case, and helped her apply for permanent residency on humanitarian and compassionate grounds.
Her application listed her address, and she said that last week officers with CBSA came to her home, detained her for two days and then on Wednesday gave her a deportation order for Saturday.
“I feel like my biggest fear has come true, I was trying to do the right thing and it might cost me my life in Canada,” she said. “Imagine living here since 12 and then someone coming and telling you that you have to leave, ripping you from your country, Canada is my county, in France I have nothing.”
Mendez, a lawyer with Jackman Nazami and Associates in Toronto, said a judge will hear her client’s case on Friday in federal court at 9:30 a.m.
Mendez said they will try to have the deportation suspended so a decision can be made on the humanitarian and compassionate application.
“It’s a very tragic case and stands against everything Canada is supposed to stand for ... she is making what is supposed to be the so-called proper way to do things and is being punished for it,” she said.
CTV News Toronto reached out to CBSA for comment, but has not received a response yet.
Souchet completed public school in Toronto, but when she was accepted into university, she was unable to attend because she did not have a SIN card and other ID necessary to study at the institution.
She said at the age of 18, she started a cleaning business and paid taxes to the Canadian government using an individual tax number, which allows non-residents to contribute to the Canada Revenue Agency.
“I wanted to do the right thing, I wanted to give back,” Souchet said. “My only dream ever since I was a child, my only wish was to become a Canadian citizen, who I am as a person is Canadian.”
She said resettling in France would be very difficult because of her lack of formal French education and employment experience there.
She said images of the immigration consultant still haunt her some days, the blond-haired woman sitting behind a desk. “It’s a memory I could never get out of my mind,” she said.
I don't agree with either situation as you mentioned, either way Canada's tax payers are still paying..
What I do agree with is proper immigration which is being enforced here.. Canada already offers enough of a free ride to immigrate here, the least you can do is file paperwork knowing it hasn't been done. Especially being when you have a tax paying number for a small business.
It's just a friendly reminder to just because you've been a resident somewhere long enough doesn't give you the entitlement to think you're a citizen, everything has an expiry date.
-
1
-
-
This title is now misleading..
-
23 minutes ago, 189lb enforcers? said:
I’ve been one of the few very vocal JB “haters” aka honest posters on here over the past several years, but I’ve relaxed my stance and posts to improve reader experience, my time management and my fan experience
.
I’m trying not to get sucked back into reality and actually discuss team management anymore. It’s political suicide in here, for one.
Shout out to to our friend, The Guardian.
We run people off here if they don’t clap for the team management as a preoccupation.
Those minus-magnets, myself included, are largely gone, but must be preparing to gloat a little, despite the obvious suffering they will also be experiencing as a true blood Canucks fan.
#Firebenning
Oh really, now.
Now?
Haha, the herd here cracks me up.
Quit putting yourself on a pedestal, you sound like an imbecile..
-
1
-
-
Just now, naslund.is.king said:
Or it just shows im looking at it from a different angle..Like who'll be listening to it and entertainment value.
If you don't think Kesler and Juice would be entertaining to listen to you're wrongly mistaken they brought entertainment here for years just with their antics.
You know they have stories to tell..
To each and their own but these two were best buds as long as they played in a Canuck uni and beyond.. I just listened give it a whirl.
-
2
-
-
On 12/6/2019 at 1:24 PM, Fateless said:
Look, I actually agree with a lot of what Lehner has to say (not all, but a lot). However, using Hitler as your analogy really just baffles me. Some people do not deserve a second chance, no matter how earnestly they seek one. Actions and words have consequences and while most things in life can be forgiven and moved past, some cannot. As a lawyer, I often see Court cases where someone who has committed a crime feels honest remorse about their actions after the fact. That does not mean they get a second chance and avoid the consequences for their actions. We'd have anarchy in the streets if the a Judge threw down their gavel and let a murderer walk free because felt true remorse after committing the crime. Sometimes change isn't enough.
Dropping your occupation doesn't make your post anymore valid.
-
On 12/13/2019 at 7:09 PM, naslund.is.king said:
I dont get why Bieska wanted to do a podcast with Kesler out of all ppl.
Shows what you know..
-
3
-
-
Heard he might have fooled around with a players wife.
-
This dude is pretty hefty for being a trainer..
-
Heard he went to an In and Out drive-thru, was bumping lines of cocaine on the dash of his car while drinking a shake and eating a cheeseburger, stole a lion from the Dallas Zoo, played some shinny at the rink at 3:00 AM blasted and zooted, passed out on his doorstep.
This is from twitter ill source you guys in a few.-
1
-
-
I guess twitter comments are a legitimate source for potential trade alerts.. The more you know.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Win or lose this team has been exciting to watch, our games are never dull with success comes growing pains. I really like where this team is headed.
Edit: I'm also thankful for our D core.. Last few years was so hard to watch my goodness.. With the naming of Bo as our captain the you can see the difference in culture in the locker room and the boys have a sense of urgency with the new faces. I just want to see a line of Rousell Motte and Ferland in the playoffs.. Already sounds like a headache for other teams.
-
1
-
3
-
2
-
7 minutes ago, Alflives said:
I remember him saying he had some sort of mental anxiety issue, when he played for us, that caused him to cramp up. These goalies in the NHL are all fabulously gifted, but it's the mental game that separates the best from the others. Look how Marky's play has been negatively impacted by his father's passing. With a guy like Marky, he will recover from the troubles. Schneider was saying he had a mental illness. Maybe being the number one go to guy in Jersey (when the team expected to win, so there was actually pressure for him to perform as the true number one) was all just too much for him to deal with? It's one thing to have Luongo supporting you. And it's another to have no real pressure to win, because the team is rebuilding. but over the past three seasons the Devils were in win mode, and Schneider must have been feeling that pressure that he never really had before. He's a great guy, but when I heard him talk about his mental weakness, I thought that could be trouble for a number one goalie on a team with the pressure to win. His skill is still there, but his brain is gone.
I also recall hearing about this, I remember reading this somewhere with a personal interview of his.
-
They do everything quite well.. The Hughes hype def is taking affect.
Think our fans are blinded because we don't even know what good defence looks like, considering last years D corp.
.
'Serious' allegations of child abuse levelled against Canucks owner Francesco Aquilini
in Canucks Talk
Posted
Love how you had to copy and paste this, doesn’t surprise me how many people posted in this thread glimpsing at this article and than giving there two cents and not reading it throughly.
Timing of the allegations don’t change the outcome of the harm that was alleged. Assumptions also don’t clear a person of being guilty or non guilty.