Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Enter Search Term. Use arrows to navigate between autocomplete results. If no results appear, use Enter to do a full site search.
Forum Closure ×
Canucks Community
Forum Closure

Scope1230

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    36

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Scope1230

    Burrows? Do We Really Need Him?

    in Canucks Talk

    Posted

    It's a bad thing because he's getting credit for being a top player when he's not. Producing is great for him, he'll get a fatter contract every time, but you said it your self you care about production so if you put a better player on the line, and the better player produces more, that's better right? all I'm saying is that players with more skills should be given a chance to play on that line. And as far as him being on a scoring line, is Kesler not on a scoring line? how come his defense coverage hasn't changed?

    And I don't feel like quoting the part you just edited so I'll answer it without a quote. A skilled player that hasn't played with the top guys that produces 50p is likely to produce more on the top line, who by the way play a style of hockey more suitable for Sammuleson.

    Didn't you hear Burrows? He said that he considers him as a 3rd liner and will get a 3rd liner contract.

    4 years @ 2m is a good contract for "3rd liner" playing on the top line.

    If he wants more than 3m, seriously, let him walk.

    No one will sign him above 3m.

    2m is a good price for BOTH Canucks and himself.

    Player B might produce better, but he's also playing with better players so therefore he should be expected to produce more.

    No, I was just saying that if he produces he'll get a raise every time which is good for him.

    No, he has produced enough, enough for him. Put a more skilled player on the line and see if he produces more.

    Maybe you don't understand how hockey works. 4 points in 11 games isn't exactly second line numbers, that's what samuelsson has, so he's not doing much right now, he is a better player then Burrows and plays a similar style to the Sedins. So putting a player like samuelsson who is a better player the burrows on the first line, and seeing if he produces better then burrows wont hurt.

    The only reason burr is on the first line is because he produces, but what if someone else can produce better then him on that line? do we not make a change because burr is producing on the first line?

    as far as currently having two scoring lines, like i pointed out 4 points in 11 games isn't exactly great. I would rather have him on the first line and someone like hansen on the 2nd line as he plays a similar type of game as kesler and raymond and he had good chemistry with Kesler last year before he got injured.

    Do you understand that many people disagree with you and you think others are wrong? Ignorant biatch.

    How long had Daniel come back? Less than 11 games.

    Guess what? When Daniel came back, he returns to his PPG. Daniel came back 5 games ago, and he has gotten 5 points.

    Do you expect a top line to have 3 PPG player especially the one with 3rd line contract? NO!

    In all seriousness, you need to see a doctor.

×
×
  • Create New...