Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

The King of Kings

Members
  • Posts

    172
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The King of Kings

  1. It has to be the OEL trade because it happened in the salry cap era.

     

    for the Nealy trade, you may say the assets that the Canucks aquired were less valuable than what the Bruins got.

     

    for the OEL trade, the Canucks got NEGATIVE values from the acquisitions.  

     

    Not only they got the assets that have a lot less value than expected, the cap hits of OEL and Garland prevent the management to acquire other pieces to improve the team.

    • Cheers 1
    • Vintage 1
  2. If the management made up their mind that they're not gonna "rebuild" (like it or not), then I am fine with the Hronek acquisition.

    And I believe that giving up a 1st round pick is pretty much a must

     

    I just dont like the fact that, they also attached a 2nd to the deal, instead of sending some contracts/cap relief to the Wings.

     

    When they traded Horvat, they eat back the Beau contract and retained 25% of Horvat.  How come there's no money going back to the Wings for the Hronek deal? Why the management was ok for that deal when they knew they have huge cap problem?

    • Wat 1
    • Upvote 1
  3. Most NHL teams have cap problem, and JR/PA succeeded some bad contracts, so I dont really mind.

     

    The issue I have with the current management is that, they keep digging holes for themselves.

     

    They had all the chances to trade at least one of Miller/Boeser/Garland since last seanson's TDL, but they did nothing fo those big contracts.  I believe there was a market for Myers too.

     

    Also, they were able to trade Bo, but why took back the Beuvillier contract? In comparison , they traded for Hronik without sending a contract away?

     

    And they re-signed Kuzmenko without a moving away one or two contracts first?

    • Cheers 1
    • Upvote 1
  4. 41 minutes ago, N4ZZY said:

    Kravstov is a bust. only reason he goes back to the K, is because I think he feels like he might not be gifted a spot for him come training camp. 

     

    We don't need players that won't compete for spots. Kinda feels like he's a second coming of Goldobin. More talent, but same will. Just doesn't have it in him to thrive and flourish in the NHL. 

     

    but does the Canucks holds the right og Kravstov?

     

    Even if the team doesnt want him, they can trade him for something

  5. Thr Myers' bnous won't be paid until September. 

     

    But by the time between the June Entry draft to Free Agency to September, most teams would already planned on how to spend the cap or already used up most of the cap.  

     

    There wont be too many teams having 6M cap space all of a sudden on Sept.

     

    Young rebuilding teams like Arizona wont pick up a 30-yr old Dmen unless you attach prospects/picks to the deal.

  6. 4 minutes ago, N4ZZY said:

    Garland could be a buyout candidate. He’s kind of a player that’s in no man’s land. Doesn’t kill penalties. Isn’t on the power play. Doesn’t produce as much offense. No other team in the league seems to be interested in him either or else I suspect he would’ve been traded already. 
     

    Brock is kind of in the same boat except that at least he’s being used as a net front presence on PP1. I think they’re both gone this off-season. This off season I get the feeling is a major one for us. 

    I really hoped that the "major" offseason was the last one.  Too bad it looked like the management refused to make big/bold moves without having their man behind the bench, and they kept patient instead.

     

    There are three overused terms by this management group:  CapSpace, Right-Handed Defencemen , and Patience.

     

    They did nothing to improve the first part; it took 20 months to make one move for the second part; but man they do have patience for player transactions.

     

     

  7. 23 hours ago, Elias Pettersson said:

    They will probably use Hoglander as a sweetener, I agree.  They need to dump at least one big contract in the summer, maybe two...

    the team has too many wingers.

     

    With the fact that they probably couldn't trade Pearson, and both Podkolzin and Hoglander need full time NHL spots (if they stay),the Canucks need to trade two of Boeser/Garland/Beauvillier

  8. Hits: 

    Dollar for dollar, Harmonic for a 3rd is the best deal they've made. 

     

    I still can't figure out how they could possibly pull this one off.

     

     

    Misses:

    The fact that Rutherford told us that, he didn't know Bruce was given a 2-yr deal still annoys me. 

     

    Was it his job to find out the basic backgound and status of the existing personnels who would be working under you during the interview?

    • Cheers 1
  9. 10 hours ago, BCNate said:

    Job 1- Open up cap space prior to the draft

    -Trade Myers, will require retention (2Mil) and not return much

    -Trade Garland, might have to retain 1 mil to acquire a 2nd

    -Trade Pearson, probably have to retain half for future considerations

    -Trade Poolmans LTIR contract.  I assume he is done, and someone will want the relief.

    This opens up 12 million.

     

    Job 2- Draft BPA

    Job 3- Be active in the NCAA/Euro/Non qualified UFAs

    Job 4- Sign our Players

    -Re Sign- Wolanin, Juulsen, Burroughs, Di Guiseppe to two way deals, or they walk

    -Re Sign Kravtsov, Bear to 1 way deals

    -Dermott and Delia walk

     

    UFA

    -Sign Soucy to play with OEL

    -Sign Graves to play with Hronek

    -Sign an experienced back up that is on the tail end of their career to a shorter cheap deal ex. Quick, Andersen

    -Sign the best defensive PK 3C we can get with our remaining $.

     

    easy.

     

    It's not easy.

    How do you find takers for the likes of Pearson and Myers.  Why NHL teams want them?

     

    Also, It's not about how little the returns are for those players, it's about what the Canucks want to add to get rid of those players.  Note that they traded two 2nd rd picks already this season.

  10.  

    “It's not the cycle we're in to trade high draft picks.”

     

     

    “I want to be careful with our trades,” said Rutherford. “I don't want to trade draft picks, unless they're later round picks. It's not the cycle we're in to trade high draft picks.”

     

    That recognition of where the Canucks are currently is key and one that the previous regime seemed to struggle with, pushing just to make the playoffs instead of maximizing a window of Cup contention.

     

     

    Credit:

     

    Daniel Wagner, vancouverisawesom.com

    Dec 13, 2021

    • Thanks 1
  11. On 3/4/2023 at 2:57 PM, N4ZZY said:

    where do you see Högs slotting into the line up? 

     

    My guess for next year's line up: 

     

    Mikheyev - Pettersson - Kuzmenko 

    Kratsov - Miller - Podkolzin

    Höglander - Dries - Boeser

    Joshua - Åman - Studnika? 

     

    Hughes - Bear

    Dermott - Hronek 

    OEL - Burroughs

     

    Demko/Martin 

     

    Is that it? Assuming that Miller and Brock are still with the team come September. 

     

    I can't believe that Myers would be back in September. I think he's either traded, or bought out. 

     

    Buying out OEL would be way too costly for way too long. 

     

    I'm not sure if that's a playoff roster to be honest. 

     

    Dries is fine as a depth and call-up player, but I would be dissapointed if he makes the regular lineup next season as 3rd line centre (assuming he is still what he is at next season's training camp).

    • Cheers 1
×
×
  • Create New...