TEAM 1040 Canucks Analysis

[AllEyezOnMe]

Sekeres and Price -> "Canucks need to get rid of Burrows and Tanev"

Lahlji -> "Jannik Hansen is not scoring, he needs to go"

Who are these guys? Hansen is one of the only guys who brings effort every night, can play in any situation and scores CLUTCH goals. Same with Burrows. Tanev is one of the only guys MG has brought in who has exceeded expectations.

Why do they not focus on guys who are useless and overpaid??

Booth, Kassian, Higgins, Edler.

They were all over Booth last night and today, "Oh Booth is playing so well!"

Why would you put Higgins in there? He works harder then Hansen

[TheAntar]

Sekeres and Price -> "Canucks need to get rid of Burrows and Tanev"

Lahlji -> "Jannik Hansen is not scoring, he needs to go"

Who are these guys? Hansen is one of the only guys who brings effort every night, can play in any situation and scores CLUTCH goals. Same with Burrows. Tanev is one of the only guys MG has brought in who has exceeded expectations.

Why do they not focus on guys who are useless and overpaid??

Booth, Kassian, Higgins, Edler.

They were all over Booth last night and today, "Oh Booth is playing so well!"

Who are you? And why are you sensationalizing comments on teamradio to prove a point?

Those aren't quotes in your post.

The closest anybody on S&P came to "trade Tanev" is saying he's our only D (aside from Stanton) without a NTC. They aren't bashing him (the way you are unfairly bashing them) fairly or otherwise just stating a fact.

In fact, the comments you are referring to we're prefaced with the suggestion that a trade involving a D is unlikely because the only actually movable piece is a likely untouchable Tanev.

Finally... The OP is a hypocrite committing the very fault he's "upset" about from the media.

[TheAntar]

Ya Higgs is clearly lazy...

Oh wait