Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME

Members
  • Posts

    10,799
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME

  1. Interesting graphic comparing defence personnel changes around the league:

     

     
    Canucks ranked 2nd in “net value added” and first in “net surplus added.”

     

    Basically, this means that Vancouver improved the value of the players on their defence by $4.7M, which is the second largest gain in the league.

     

    And they improved the surplus value (or contract efficiency) of the defence by $8.06M, which was best in the NHL.

     

    It’s going to be interesting to see how the final roster for the defence looks on the various models, but I suspect that, for the first time in many years, we might have a defence that rates fairly well in both overall player value (ie: quality of personnel) and surplus value (ie: efficiency of contracts).


    Or to put it another way: instead of continually overpaying for underperformance, we might now be moving toward a having a defence that actually outperforms their salaries and stacks up pretty well against the good teams.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. 3 minutes ago, Hairy Kneel said:

    Pour' qua of this cap increases that you speak of good sir?

    I was sort of being tongue in cheek and maybe exaggerating a little bit. But maybe not even an exaggeration. I have seen estimates of the cap hitting $92M in just a few years (2025-26 projection), so it could very well push close to $100M by the time Graves is getting to the end of his deal in 2028-29.

    • Thanks 1
  3. 3 minutes ago, bishopshodan said:

    Hard to say tougher as we don't have Schenn but overall we should be better and we have some big D.

    Which is what everyone loves right? big D.

    Yeah, it’s tough when you lose the NHL’s hits leader (Schenn was first in the league with 318 hits).

     

    And also Burroughs, who was #2 on the Canucks and #63 in the NHL, with 165 hits in 2022-23.

     

    I think each of the new Dmen are 100+ hits per season guys. And Hronek is also around 100/season.

     

    (I looked it up earlier today and if memory serves, Soucy had 145 hits, Cole and Irwin each had 117, and Hronek something like 101, between Detroit and Vancouver.)

     

    Not that hits are everything, when it comes to toughness.

    • Cheers 3
  4. 2 hours ago, Spoosh said:

    If someone has the energy to look up how many defensemen we use per year, that should clarify why we sign guys like this. We have had so much injury trouble on the backend for the last 20 years, that we all know we have to have options here.

     

    He might be old, but not obsolete.

    Not sure if anyone posted a reply yet, but the Canucks used 16 defencemen in 2022-23 and 13 defencemen in 2021-22. :blink:
     

    EDIT: just for comparison’s sake, looking at our closest geographical rivals (a random choice, although somewhat appropriate, given travel and it’s possible effect on injuries/durability), last season the Oilers used 11 different Dmen, the Flames 10, and the Kraken needed only 9 defencemen for the whole season.

    • Thanks 2
  5. 18 minutes ago, Kenny Powers said:

    PK and our top 4D has a new look. Only one player (on the right side of 30) given a medium term deal.

     

    No big names or retirement contracts.

     

    Pretty judicious use of the buyout cap space

     

    I’m excited to see what the new staff can do on the PK with this group. And also a full camp to build systems (plus their off-season planning and meetings).

     

    Would be amazing if one of this team’s Achilles heels could suddenly become something of a strength.

     

    I definitely think the new additions will help. 

    • Cheers 2
  6. Bonino is so underrated. He’s been sneaky good through his 30’s (arguably playing some of the better hockey of his career), repeatedly outperforming his contracts, offering positive impacts on 5v5 defence and the PK, and putting up decent rates of secondary scoring. At $800K, he’s versatile, bargain depth and a great value signing.

    • Cheers 1
    • Upvote 1
  7. 4 minutes ago, MaxVerstappen33 said:

    Does he kill penatlies,?

    No. And he’s pretty much negative value defensively. But offensively, he’s worth a lot more than $3M.

     

    If nothing else, could pad his stats and then flip him for a tidy return at the TDL.

     

    He’s also a high end faceoff guy (usually wins around 55%) and a C/W who could slot into a number of spots in the lineup.

     

    Duchene wasn’t really a fit for the immediate needs on the Canucks roster, but as $3M, it’s just such good value.

     

    Probably he’d have wanted a lot more to come here, however.

    • Upvote 1
  8. Given his age and profile, this is a very reasonable UFA signing (compared to what we normally see from the July 1st market). Soucy was in the group of players you typical see getting stupid overpayments in other years. 
     

    I liked his overall statistical profile more when he was with the Wild than the Kraken, so we’ll see what he brings (analytically) as a Canuck.

     

    He’s an obvious match for what’s needed on the D corps, so I’m optimistic the fit here will prove to be a good one.

     

    With some luck, he’ll prove to be a solid middle pairing, 20 minute/game Dman, who brings much needed size and consistently positive defensive impacts.

    • Like 1
    • Cheers 2
  9. Can’t complain about signing a UFA like Cole to the same AAV as his last deal, despite him moving to a much high tax city.

     

    Cole is also coming off his career best season in GAR (8.2) and EVD (even strength defensive) GAR (8.9).

     

    For what it’s worth, that kind of GAR impact is valued at $8.8M (per Evolving Hockey).

    • Cheers 1
    • Upvote 2
  10. Have to say, the deals announced so far are, on average, pretty sane for July 1st.

     

    It’s probably just a one off this year, due to the cap pressures around the league.

     

    I’d expect the stupidity arms race to start again in earnest when the cap starts going up in the next few years.

     

    But it’s nice to see GMs making UFA deals that make sense.

     

    The day’s early yet, however. 

    • Cheers 2
×
×
  • Create New...