Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

AK_19

Members
  • Posts

    703
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AK_19

  1. On 9/13/2023 at 9:26 PM, Kootenay Gold said:

    I would switch Sasson and Aman and Karlsson and Klimovich. Also not sure if Rau or Keeper are still part of the team, I thought they left for greener pastures.

    Agreed and updated!
     
    NHL
     
    Kuzmenko Pete Beauviller
    Garland Miller Boeser
    Mikheyev Suter Hoglander
    PDG Blueger Joshua
    Studnicka
     
    Hughes Cole
    Soucy Hronek
    Irwin Myers
    Rathbone Woo
     
    Demko
    Martin
     
     
    AHL
     
    Karlsson Sasson Dries
    Klimovich Raty Podkolzin
    Pearson Aman McDonough
    Bains Nielson Bloom
     
    Wouters, Arsenau, Gatcomb, Passolt
     
    Hirose Juulson
    Wolanin McWard
    Brisbois Johansson
     
    Daschke, Joyaux, Schmeiman
     
     
    Silovs
    Lemiuex
    • Like 2
  2. Looks like we're going to have a great Abbotsford team this year. Assuming Hoglander, Studnicka, Irwin, Rathbone, and Woo make the canucks (I picked them because of their lack of waiver eligibility) I project the lineup to be:

     

    Klimovich Aman Dries
    Karlsson Raty Podkolzin
    Pearson Sasson Rau
    Bains Nielson Bloom
    Rau
     
     
    Hirose Juulson
    Wolanin McWard
    Brisbois Johansson
    Keeper
     
    Silovs
    • There it is 1
  3. Hard to define disappointment. I think factors should include hype beforehand and what negative effect they left the team in. I'm not including people where the disappointment is a result of primarily an injury (David Booth, Michael Ferland, Cody Hodgson, and Sven Baertschi). Certain players I never watched I won't comment on (Alek Stojanov, Shawn Antoski, and Krutov). 
     
    Nikta Tryamkin
     
    He only cost us a 3rd round pick and although he showed he could play in the NHL, it was only at a 3rd pairing level. I don't believe his departure really affected the team as we just got similar skilled 3rd pairing dmen at UFA the following season.
     
    Keith Ballard
     
    This one may have cost us a cup. His large cap hit at the time (3/4 million) and the cost of acquisition (Grabner + 1st rounder) prevented us from obtaining better depth the last time we went to the finals. Ballard went from being a top 4 dman to having 7/8th dmen like Rome being played before him. The guy just fell off the map the moment he joined the team. The guy had more points the season joining us than he did the following five years. He was a cap anchor for three years we were competing for the cup.
     
    Olli Juolevi
     
    We have not had a draft pick that high bust so badly in a long time. This one stings because he was also not the BPA. Some may chop this one up to his injury but I don't. He had a terrible draft+1 before his injury issues. We desperately needed to develop dmen into our system at that time and our chronic issues and it is in part because Juolevi didn't work out. He wasn't even close.
     
    Loui Eriksson
     
    I would pick this one as the most disappointing. The hype was real for this guy coming in. I don't anyone predicted he would be so bad from the outset after having such a consistent career and just finishing off a season with 30G/30A. He looked amazing with the Sedins internationally. As far as I'm aware the Sedins even supported the signing. The guy then played at the level of a 3rd/4th liner for 6 years at the high cap hit of 6 mil. Some seasons he was our highest paid player. The signing sealed the end of the Sedin era and crippled the following on with Pete/Hughes/Demko. In part because of him, we lost important parts to our team after the bubble season (Tanev, Toffoli) and he is in part why we did the terrible OEL trade. Also, his contract prevented us from obtaining better long term contracts for Hughes and Pettersson. 
     
    Jake Virtanen
    Basically Olli Joulevi but not as bad. He wasn't drafted as high and he was at least was able to have a regular roster spot for a few years.
     
    Jay Beagle
    Overpaid but the expectations were relatively low to begin with. I actually thought our team lost something after he was traded as our PK has never been the same. Main disappointment was that he was a part of the terrible OEL trade.
     
    Mark Messier
     
    I know expectations are high but perhaps those were unwarranted. He was quite old when we got him, I'm not sure his stats were so bad that he sunk our team. If anything, I think if he stayed healthy we would've made the playoffs some of the seasons he was there. Furthermore, his contract was only 3 years and it was outside of the cap era. Nothing was stopping the owners from paying for a better supporting cast. I really think the concerns over Messier are overrated over players such as Eriksson. 
     
     
    Oliver Ekman-Larsson
    I did expect a top 4 D out of OEL so I was disappointed we didn't even get that. His cap hit and buyout is killer. This one is hard to rate because the effects of the buyout are still yet to be seen.  
     
    Linden Vey
    I mean we lost a second rounder. My expectations were already quite low and his cap hit was also low so it didn't really affect our team long term or even short term.
     
    Jordan Schroeder
    Basically Olli Joulevi/ Jake Virtanen except an even lower 1st rounder so lower expectations.
    • Cheers 1
  4. Joshua is great at faceoffs but his game is more tailored to the wing. Beauviller is terrible at faceoffs but I can see his defensive awareness and speed being great qualities for the centre. I think a combination of both on the third line with Joshua taking faceoffs for Beauviller. Not unlike when we used to do that with Miller and Petey.

  5. On 5/14/2023 at 9:41 AM, Warhippy said:

    Check the lists.  Check what was stated about them.  Nobody was happy with the OJ pick but he was the consensus best defenseman even though lost of us had tkachuk and sergachev ahead of him.

     

    White was the BPA at that time at his position but didn't fill a need for us at the position needed.

     

    At days end picking BPA consistently has actually been a negative for the Canucks org

    Well now you're just moving goalposts. The point your were making was BPA, not BPA for position of need which is contrary to the whole point of your post. Matthew Tkachuk was almost universally considered BPA for that draft. 

     

    Here's some of the draft lists for Patrick White:

     

    https://www.insidecollegehockey.com/7Archives/Draft/2007/predraft_ranks0536.htm

     

    He was ranked #60 by Hockey News, #34 by ISS, #46 by TSN, and #21 by Mckeen's hockey. On the only list that ranked Patrick White better than where we drafted him, they also put Bill Sweat and Nick Petrecki in front of him who were available. Patrick White was NOT BPA. 

     

    Awhile back we had someone do a couch potato drafter who did BPA based only on very simple stats. The couch potato regularly beat the Canucks drafting over the last decade. 

    • Cheers 1
    • Upvote 1
  6. 22 hours ago, Warhippy said:

    He was one of my two picks last year.  BPA has done the canucks very little in the way of help over the past few decades.  Virtanen was deemed BPA by a few lists.  Juolevi was BPA on a number as well.  The issue with lists is when we see that redraft 5 years later we get the idea that the people making those lists hit far less than they miss.  

     

    Grabner was the BPA in 2006.  Postionally though we needed a big bodied RW/RHC and RHD but passed on Lewis, Stewart and Giroux

    2007 with the Sedins and Kesler on line we needed a quality LW and RHD and grabbed BPA Patty White, passed on Perron and Subban

    2008, still needed RHD, RHC and an LW.  Took BPA Hodgson and passed on Karlsson

    2009....still needed RHC, RHD and LW and took BPA Schroeder over Johansson Palmeiri and O'Reilly

     

    If you go way WAY back to numerous draft threads on this very forum.  The BPA chosen by Vancouver has consistently not been the best choice over one of the more positional needs.

     

    Bischel is a safe pick to be a 4-6 defenceman at his floor and that's a good thing for any team

    Joulevi and Patrick White were not BPA. Virtanen could be considered a stretch too, he had some rankings all the way to the second round.

  7. I'm a little surprised we didn't pick him up. I felt like there were a lot of rumours of a Kapanen trade to the Canucks in the off season. He also seems to fit the mold management wants for our wingers which are speedy and good defensively (Mikheyev, Beauviller). I haven't watched him play but about 0.5 ppg seems pretty good for his cap hit. 

  8. 45 minutes ago, coho8888 said:

    You keep trying to make this inference that you need a top 3 draft pick to win the cup but then have to qualify it numerous exceptions?  not a very strong inference. No one here disputes the fact that to build a cup winning team, you need to draft well and develop those you draft properly.  Not having a top 3 pick does not mean you can't win the cup and having a top 3 doesn't guarantee that you win a cup.  To win a cup you need a lot of things to go right.  and BTW, Makar was not a top 3 pick either.

     

     

    I mean the general sentiment is it's easier to build a contender/win cup with a top 3 pick than without. Is that not fair?

  9. On 2/17/2023 at 9:17 AM, jyu said:

    Guess people were happy with the performances of Lammi and High so they took it for granted that they would be re-signed?

     

    Motte wasn't coming back but he had trouble finding a suitor until later in the offseason... maybe people thought that we could bring him back?

     

    Whatever Allvin tried to upgrade the 4th line and PK, did not work. It made things worse.

     

     

    I don't think we can say that it didn't work. Last year had Demko, this year we've had essentially AHL goaltending. The goalie is probably the biggest factor for a PK.

×
×
  • Create New...