-
Posts
15,426 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Qwags
-
-
27 minutes ago, UnkNuk said:
I'm sensing a lack of enthusiasm for my proposal.
Let me repeat: this is for those fans (like myself) who think the Canucks are going to make the playoffs this season. If we do, we're going to be picking 17th or higher and won't be getting a crack at Bedard or the other top four. (I've read here, for people who know more about the upcoming draft than I, that the top five are all pretty good.)
On the other hand, if you think, as some here do, that the Canucks are a terrible team who are going to finish somewhere near the bottom of the table, then, sure, you hold onto the pick.
The real question, it seems to me, is what do Rutherford and the rest of Canucks management, think about this team's prospects? If they believe this is a playoff team I could see them making a trade like this. But it would have to be in the near future while the Canucks are still (temporarily) wallowing at the bottom of the league.
Rutherford, I believe, has a reputation as a wheeler-dealer. You have to admit, swapping our first round pick would be a wheel-and-deal.
Is there a risk involved? Yes. But, as the saying goes: no risk, no reward. Or, no guts, no glory.
Also, consider the impact such a swap would have on our team. That is, suppose Rutherford came out and said: "There's no way on God's green earth that we will swap our first round pick!". What message would that send to the team? It would say that he and the rest of management have no confidence that they are capable of getting into the playoffs and that our draft pick will be a high one.
On the other hand, if he did swap draft picks in the manner I proposed, it would be a vote of confidence in our team. That management thinks they will finish higher up in the standings with a lower draft pick that is tradeable.
Why do you think this team is playoff bound?
-
14 hours ago, -Vintage Canuck- said:
It's funny how this team has had an (arguable) increase in the quality of coaching in the last 10 years, yet the team continues to perform worse and worse.
To me, it's 100% on the players, and always has been.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I would straight up stop watching this team if this happened.
A draft with this much depth, you shouldn't be giving up ANY picks.
-
2
-
2
-
4
-
2
-
1
-
- Popular Post
2-6-2 is a good record right? Like that's a record you expect after a decade of being bad?
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
-
-
Yeah tell me again how OEL and Myers are good.
-
1
-
-
Playing Stillman over Rathbone or Burroughs.
-
1
-
-
Team looks a little out of sync at the moment.
-
1
-
-
-
Leafs bad, Canucks good.
-
3
-
-
W #601 for Bruce.
-
1
-
-
The boys know the 3rd has started, right?
-
Nice move by Mikheyev.
-
1
-
-
Mfw I'm in a content with mediocrity competition and my opponent is a Canucks fan.
-
1
-
-
Will Bear and Studnicka be in the lineup?
-
8 minutes ago, VforVasili said:
Just quoting this again to prove my point. This was what set everything off.
Absolutely NO ONE is arguing with the many reasonable people who have stated they are concerned about this trade or those like me that think it’s fine.
It is a disingenuous bunch of nonsense from the freedumb convoy playlist to be insulting and then scream that you are being oppressed because people react with the same negativity you dished out.
What does the convoy have to do with the Canucks trade?
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
Canucks vs not trading for reclamation pieces and just drafting well.
-
I wish Ethan Bear good luck. He's gonna need it playing for this defence.
Why bother having a scouting department if you're just gonna trade all the picks anyway?-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
This really is a classic Benning Nucks win:
Play like complete shit
Rely on goaltending to make big saves
Get completely hemmed in own zone for an entire periodSomehow barely pull out a win
Someone critical on the team gets injured-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
Mfw it takes one win in which the Canucks played like they have all season and some people think this team has earned the right to be taken serious.
-
Doesn't change anything about this team.
-
1
-
-
This just reminds me of a Travis Green led team. Next to no possession.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
54 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said:Benning never left.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
1
[GDT] November 3, 2022 Anaheim Ducks @ Vancouver Canucks - 7:00pm PT Rogers Arena
in Canucks Talk
Posted
PP still stinky.