-
Posts
1,901 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Blog Comments posted by Hamhuis2
-
-
^ a few of these guys could be with the big club next year. I still consider Jensen a prospect, as he has not broken in with the Canucks full time yet. I would rank Fox in the 12-15 range. He may be good, but he also may be a complete bust. Hard to tell with overagers.
-
Thanks!
- 1
-
Good job. You forgot Corrado though!
-
^no spinning necessary, Benning had us covered!
-
Wow I was way off! The Canucks ended up in the best possible position that they could.
-
^Good call, I completely forgot about that when I wrote this. I'm not gonna edit the blog post, but thanks for pointing that out.
-
I assume you mean Kessel on wing above. Also, not convince Big Buff can handle the big ice. He'll definitely get a look though
-
Spezxa is a great player, don't get me wrong, however I feel that their are just better options than him. He is a great all around player, but is not dynamic enough to play over guys like Duchene or St. Louis in the top-6 or as solid as guys like Perry and Bergeron in the bottom-6.I believe a healthy Nash is a lock, he has performed well for Canada at every international event. Giroux on the other hand, while at the beginning of the season I would have picked him, has played himself off of the team in my opinion. As for Seguin(who is making a strong case for himself) as Lupul, I just see too many better options. Many other players are better two-way players and can match their offensive output. I left Thornton off purely on foodspeed on big ice, not due to lack of skill.
-
With the news of Stamkos' injury, IF he is not ready to go, who do you guys think takes his roster spot?
-
Thanks, I appreciate the feedback.
Canucks Prospects: A Look at the Top 10, and a Look at the Future
in Hamhuis2's Blog
A blog by Hamhuis2 in General
Posted
Thank you for your input.
@the_grinder: Grenier is a solid prospect, but I believe that the guys I listed all have higher upside. If I had an honorable mentions list, he would be on it.
@Absent_Canuck: I'd like to hear your reasoning for these assumptions. All scouting reports indicate that Virtanen very well could be a 30 goal NHL player, he was one of the best, if not the best, pure goal scorer in his class.
As for Gaunce, like I said, he looks to be a very good 3rd line center.I compared him to Berglund, who has had one 50 point year, but is usually more in the 35-45 range, which is where I project Gaunce.
Demko I agree will be a stud.
Mccann I projected as a Valteri Flipula type player, so I'm not sure what you're getting at.
Shinkaruk I also think has 1st line potental and while Jensen could,he is projected to be more of a 2nd liner.