Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

NotMyBurroughs

Members
  • Posts

    3,787
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by NotMyBurroughs

  1. Just now, naslund.is.king said:

    ask me anything I think we went over your mad scramble of a post

    but go ahead

    So passive.

     

    No I’m the one who’s put in work through multiple in detail posts today. 
     

    You put in work :) 

     

    Im watching the nba all star weekend still. you’re just aside hustle ;) 

    • Like 2
  2. 1 minute ago, naslund.is.king said:

    You know what this means right?

    No what does that quote mean?

     

    Youve refrained from talking about most of my points labeling them as   me points.

     

    What does it mean, it’s still me being open about things I’ve noticed.

    As a mafia it’s a bit risky for me to bring up so many things I notice. 

    • Like 2
  3. 2 minutes ago, naslund.is.king said:

    then why wait till immediately after my vote on you?

    Sorry I don't buy it or your explanation that explanation looks very scrambled for someone who like you said spent alot of time explaining things and obviously reading back 

    Conveniently said by the person my post is about.

    Youre definitely the most trustworthy opinion 

    • Like 2
  4. 2 minutes ago, naslund.is.king said:

    I just say &^@# it and let it roll 

    Whats the significance of me and av both looking at the triangle?

    Also can you take a little more time and explain what you just said there about bj ? 

    I spend quite a bit of time posting today to explain and quote posts on it.

     

    May be wrong but it’s an observation.

     

    See when someone is confirmed mafia after dying round one(no mafia expects to die round one)

    You can look at their posts and look for clues!

     

    I saw a pattern with you and Av.

     

    It along with the other 4 reasons were enough for me to vote 

     

    • Like 2
  5. 13 minutes ago, naslund.is.king said:

    it just doesn't add up tho with a read back 

    and I have been like this with you all game! we had a big back and forth earlier and you declared me town

    Then you do your read back I vote for you again and boom Your suddenly scrambling some nonsense to vote for me 

    You've been my park vote. I left my vote on you last night You did a read back and now your almost scrambling trying to explain it

     

     

    You’re right you had the same target since the game opened :p

     

    Saying I declared you town is fun.

    Almost like one of my points was after our first  interaction,  I made a point of mentioning how you got very quiet in comparison to the first round. Almost like trying to blend in after unwanted attention.

     

    How am I scrambling. I was quiet last night before my unvote (no ones brought up it broke the tie)

    Ive brought on the conversations

    • Like 2
  6. 1 minute ago, naslund.is.king said:

    is she just double downing with the derps?

    I may easily be wrong on you. But I was able to think of many reasons and that what I went with.

     

    But quoting yourself like that is pretty funny.

    • Like 2
  7. 2 minutes ago, naslund.is.king said:

     

     

     

     

     

    Like how do you get that wrong ?

    How 

    Yes you have your way but you did a big read back didn't vote for me and now voting for me upon what someone else said?

     

    I can admit when I’m wrong.

     

    Negate that one reason. 
    Who was being discussed then that was spanking. Multiple people were talking about it. As I said I wasn’t I to that reasoning. 

    • Like 2
  8. Terrible post I know^
     

    But Bluejay dying last night makes some kind of sense if NIK is mafia.

     

    They bicker more then almost anyone. And with me as his voting target and BJ not susing NIK (I remember a post where NIK replied with emotes when Bluejay didn’t have him on the sus list)

     

    In contrast, blue jay was susing me but not voting me. It makes much less sense to kill him if I were mafia.

    • Like 2
  9. 1 minute ago, naslund.is.king said:

    usually when a player reads back they pay extra or atleast enough attention to players they're going after to get something right and not go off what others are saying

    I’m unique and focus on my own red flags then I guess.

     

    As explained in my numerous posts today.

    where as you got quiet after our interaction more then a day ago.

    Until this again today that is. 

    • Like 2
  10. 1 minute ago, naslund.is.king said:

    For reading back and voting for a player for whatever reason you sure dropped the ball saying I went after slankers

    Weak defence considering I mentioned 4 different points/reasons

    You got stuck on a single word to defend it all.

     

    You getting called out for focusing on slankers the first 4 hours is documented. 
    I didn’t bring it up once before using it as one of 4 reasons for changing my vote 

    • Like 2
  11. 4 minutes ago, naslund.is.king said:

    so other then the love triangle it's all about you

    when did I push slankers?

    The AV part isn’t about me. 
     

    The 3rd part slankers part was something mentioned by others in the early game I didn’t think it was big But it was brought up more then once.

     

    The 4th part was me noticing you getting very quiet after that one interaction and explain what I noticed so yes that was about me. 

    • Like 2
  12. Unvote vote NIK

     

    I have 3 reasons.

     

    1) Early start and our interaction. It would make sense to play off our argument and vote me and now has stayed with. 
    It’s convenient and familiar. 
     

    2) AV posted multiples times about the love triangle and trio and how sure he was. 
     

    the only other person who’s posted multiple times trying to push that narrative was NIK

     

    3) He was pushing slankers very early day one. Another attempt to seem as active.

     

    4 as a bonus) After our mini argument, he has become much more quiet(while still upvoting)

     

    That reads to me as not liking the attention it brought him and trying to blend in.

    • Like 2
    • Cheers 1
    • Haha 1
  13. 20 minutes ago, AngryElf said:

    Because AV flipped red and I’m trying to see what his gameplan was, along with how others fit into that? Loaded question tbh. 
     

    I was clearly supposed to be a pocket, and it does look like I was a fallback plan in case he was knocked out. There were only two people vouching for me and both were complimenting my style of play without asking any questions. You were one, AV was the other. 

    Lol you were one of my suspects to start. That’s not vouching for you. I complimented last game. (Lewt made the same point) 

     

    My emote on you(post you quoted) was in reference to you saying I was acting like a genuine town. Not because I was voting you or clearing you. 

    • Like 2
  14. 50 minutes ago, AngryElf said:

    AV with the (now) obvious pocket attempt, I wonder if I was identified as someone to try and pocket because I generally have no idea wtf I’m doing?

    This doesn’t match our previous talks this game. Give yourself more credit. 

    Ive said this game (so has lewt) that you were MK’d last game because you were playing well, and we took advantage of you being quiet for a round.


    I mentioned you were playing different very early this game and you tunneled on talking about me a lot since then. 
     

    Also how can you say this when AV mentioned saving you for 2 rounds because you’re insightful?

    • Like 3
  15. 53 minutes ago, Aladeen said:

    Good catch man I saw Detective and thought that was sheriff. Well $&!# 

     

    unvote

    I thought the same thing honestly.

     

    This does kind of moot your entire reasoning on J-23 

    At least the reasoning you were stuck on trying to explain.

     

    Im am very far from clearing her. She was just posting good points to counter your hunch reasoning.(the timing of the activity was only to defend. Not super town helpful overall)

    Pretty similar to how I countered you last game by picking apart the flaws in how you explain. 

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...