Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Loungo's Stats In Game 1 Are They Correct?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
11 replies to this topic

#1 Canuckfan1968

Canuckfan1968

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 964 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 05

Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:29 PM

http://www.nhl.com/i...sAgainstAverage

how is Jaroslav Halak and Corey Crawford GAA lower then loungo's who faced 4 shot more and allowed three goals, shouldnt it be lower then 3.05 that just cant be right.

Edited by Canuckfan1968, 13 April 2012 - 06:30 PM.


#2 surtur

surtur

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,936 posts
  • Joined: 19-March 10

Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:31 PM

i think it has to do with Time on ice

but i actually have no idea would make sense he did not play 60 min so he is .05 over on GAA??

Edited by surtur, 13 April 2012 - 06:33 PM.

Release The KraKassian
Kassianthe_Krakensm.jpg


#3 Demo250

Demo250

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,090 posts
  • Joined: 18-November 10

Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:34 PM

i think it has to do with Time on ice

but i actually have no idea would make sense he did not play 60 min so he is .05 over on GAA??


Because to get GAA you take the goals allowed, multiply it by 60, then divide by minutes played.

That's why some of the goalies who played into OT have a lower than 3 GAA even if they allowed 3. That is also how Luongo has a higher than 3. (Since he was pulled for the last minute or whatever)

Edited by Demo250, 13 April 2012 - 06:35 PM.

Posted Image
Posted Image

#4 Canuckfan1968

Canuckfan1968

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 964 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 05

Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:34 PM

Jimmy howards is the same and he had less ice and faced less shots then loungo

#5 Ṣpiderman

Ṣpiderman

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,457 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 11

Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:35 PM

There's nothing wrong.

What you're talking about is SV %.

GAA is correct because of the amount of time the other goalies have played.

Posted Image


#6 EastCoastCanuck

EastCoastCanuck

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 121 posts
  • Joined: 29-May 07

Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:35 PM

GAA goes on Minutes played. Luongo was on the bench for 51 seconds his time on ice is 59:09. So he allowed 3 goals while playing less than 60 mins. Halak and Crawford both went into overtime. So because they let up 3 goals each in more than 60 mins their GAA would be less than Louies.



You could basically call GAA...Goals allowed per 60mins. That would be a better representation of what the number actually is.

Edited by EastCoastCanuck, 13 April 2012 - 06:37 PM.


#7 Ṣpiderman

Ṣpiderman

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,457 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 11

Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:36 PM

Jimmy howards is the same and he had less ice and faced less shots then loungo


That is why his SV % is lower

Posted Image


#8 surtur

surtur

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,936 posts
  • Joined: 19-March 10

Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:36 PM

Because to get GAA you take the goals allowed, multiply it by 60, then divide by minutes played.

makes sense ...
i am not a stats guy in any way.. but that is what is saw when looking at it.. TOI and goals against
thanks for confirming that for me

Release The KraKassian
Kassianthe_Krakensm.jpg


#9 Canuckfan1968

Canuckfan1968

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 964 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 05

Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:36 PM

with less time on the ice and 12 shots less you would think him and loungo wouldnt both have a 3.05 GAA it your calculation is right

#10 Canuckfan1968

Canuckfan1968

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 964 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 05

Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:37 PM

oh ok just seems high

#11 Grapefruits

Grapefruits

    Fruit

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,744 posts
  • Joined: 18-March 08

Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:37 PM

G.A.A is probably one of the stupidest stats in hockey. The real measure for a goalie is Save % in my opinion.

qrak1x.jpg


#12 Real deal - Stan Smyl

Real deal - Stan Smyl

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 300 posts
  • Joined: 16-March 12

Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:43 PM

Shots have nothing to do with it!

Goals against x 60 / minutes played = GAA

Save percentage is a better stat, but the most telling stat is this one. Lu is 0-1.




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.