Canuckfan1968 Posted April 14, 2012 Share Posted April 14, 2012 http://www.nhl.com/i...sAgainstAverage how is Jaroslav Halak and Corey Crawford GAA lower then loungo's who faced 4 shot more and allowed three goals, shouldnt it be lower then 3.05 that just cant be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surtur Posted April 14, 2012 Share Posted April 14, 2012 i think it has to do with Time on ice but i actually have no idea would make sense he did not play 60 min so he is .05 over on GAA?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demo250 Posted April 14, 2012 Share Posted April 14, 2012 i think it has to do with Time on ice but i actually have no idea would make sense he did not play 60 min so he is .05 over on GAA?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuckfan1968 Posted April 14, 2012 Author Share Posted April 14, 2012 Jimmy howards is the same and he had less ice and faced less shots then loungo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ṣpiderman Posted April 14, 2012 Share Posted April 14, 2012 There's nothing wrong. What you're talking about is SV %. GAA is correct because of the amount of time the other goalies have played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastCanuck Posted April 14, 2012 Share Posted April 14, 2012 GAA goes on Minutes played. Luongo was on the bench for 51 seconds his time on ice is 59:09. So he allowed 3 goals while playing less than 60 mins. Halak and Crawford both went into overtime. So because they let up 3 goals each in more than 60 mins their GAA would be less than Louies. You could basically call GAA...Goals allowed per 60mins. That would be a better representation of what the number actually is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ṣpiderman Posted April 14, 2012 Share Posted April 14, 2012 Jimmy howards is the same and he had less ice and faced less shots then loungo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surtur Posted April 14, 2012 Share Posted April 14, 2012 Because to get GAA you take the goals allowed, multiply it by 60, then divide by minutes played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuckfan1968 Posted April 14, 2012 Author Share Posted April 14, 2012 with less time on the ice and 12 shots less you would think him and loungo wouldnt both have a 3.05 GAA it your calculation is right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuckfan1968 Posted April 14, 2012 Author Share Posted April 14, 2012 oh ok just seems high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grapefruits Posted April 14, 2012 Share Posted April 14, 2012 G.A.A is probably one of the stupidest stats in hockey. The real measure for a goalie is Save % in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real deal - Stan Smyl Posted April 14, 2012 Share Posted April 14, 2012 Shots have nothing to do with it! Goals against x 60 / minutes played = GAA Save percentage is a better stat, but the most telling stat is this one. Lu is 0-1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.