Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

DollarAndADream

NHL 13 - CDC Sim Connected [PS3 SIM LEAGUE] pt 3

Poll Regarding Player Rental Trades   16 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you want to allow trades for renting players?

    • Yes.
      5
    • No.
      11

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

2,949 posts in this topic

fyi if you have the cap and the interest, Rick DiPietro will be waived on Day 1, so I am willing to accept a 7th for him right now.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does everyone know of the new restrictions on the UNRESTRICTED Free Agents

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does everyone know of the new restrictions on the UNRESTRICTED Free Agents

This rule applies to any player only on the first day of UFA signings that is either over 82 overall OR 4 stars yellow and higher.

1.) Players who meet the above criteria that are signed to one-year deals, cannot be traded at any point during their season, they must also be forced to test free agency again the next summer.

2.) Players who are signed for multi-year deals will become the property of the team and full rights to the individual team are given.

This rule will then allow players to get fair market value the next summer if offered a one year deal, and teams cannot acquire a player for the purpose of trading for other valueable assets or to re-sign a player for a significant discount the following year, just because in one season they have the capspace.

We feel this rule will make the UFA signing periods more equal, fair and most importantly realistic.

If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to voice your concerns in a professional manner.

Sincerely,

The BoG

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't make that up, It is from the BOG's

and no I am not on the BoG

Its a fact Jack look on page 17

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't make that up, It is from the BOG's

and no I am not on the BoG

Its a fact Jack look on page 17

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a new announcement. Dallas made a trade sending Juusi Ikonen to the Rangers, the trade never went through as EA booted it.

Dallas then did not sign Ikonen for the Rangers. He didn't even qualify him. With other players like Spezza and other Dallas Stars its seems like Dallas has become dormant.

Whomever signs Juuso Ikonen must trade him back to the New York Rangers with a 7th rounder for a 7th rounder.

Please don't bid on him.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's kind of a bogus rule, since the advantage of having more cap than another team is to be able to get a player the other can't, but then you have to give him up if it's a one year deal? I'm indifferent towards it, but I see the pros and cons.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's kind of a bogus rule, since the advantage of having more cap than another team is to be able to get a player the other can't, but then you have to give him up if it's a one year deal? I'm indifferent towards it, but I see the pros and cons.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brendan Gallagher for sale 74 OVR already 87 Def Awareness. Going to break out in a year or 2. Looking for 83 OVR d-man (at least) on good contract (less than 5M)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Juuso Ikonen is the property of the Rangers, whomever wins his contract must trade him or someone equivalent to the Rangers (if the contract is ridiculous). Please be forewarned.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brendan Gallagher for sale 74 OVR already 87 Def Awareness. Going to break out in a year or 2. Looking for 83 OVR d-man (at least) on good contract (less than 5M)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey quick question did we implement the rule I suggested that players asking for a 2 way contract cannot be offered a 1 way contract. This is to avoid what happened with Edmonton and how they spent 9M on that one Swedish dude.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not sure, did we?

The not being able to offer 4 star and higher players or over 82 overall 1 year deals fixed that Edmonton fiasco too.

What did we decide about 2-way contracts. I'm sure someone already offered a 2-way player a 1-way deal.

I would think if we all offered the 2-way player a 2-way contract, it would be interesting to see how the player picks what team

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if a player is initially asking for a 2 way deal you can't give him more money than .925M. If you change the deal to a 1 way you can give him as much as you want. I think if every team can only offer say .925M for 3 yrs to a UFA prospect for example then we'll get to see the prospect pick the best fit since everyone's offering the same thing.

The reason this is better than your rule is because someone can offer a 4 star prospect 2 years at say 5M and won't have to give him up.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea exactly I just don't know if we made that rule. It does make sense, but with people already bidding I'm sure someone already offered a one way deal. We will consider it for next year, but its probably too late for this season.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cause I suggested that right after that edmonton signing. Guess no one listened. Anyway I played fair. Offered the 2 top UFA prospects the max I could given a 2-way contract.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We all did discuss it but I don't think it was given enough thought. I don't know if we should make it two way has to be two way, but maybe we could put a cap for two way players of 2 million on a one way, so that some strategy is still involved.

I'm just throwing out an idea.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.