Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Noseforthenet

Members
  • Posts

    1,993
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Noseforthenet

  1. When there gets to be an ask like this, you gotta think he doesn't wanna be there anymore. I don't care how successful Colorado has been getting. He's the captain who, if he stayed, would lose his captaincy. He's kind of lost in the shuffle. I often forget he's even an Av sometimes. Behind Mack and Ranty on the depth chart, it's easier to get lost in the shuffle. He likely has more to give than what he would be able to give in Colorado.

  2. He doesn't like the Canucks AT ALL! I mean MAYBE he would come here because the entire core has been turned over, but this smells more like a waiving his NMC, so Seattle selects him. He's from Winnipeg, but his home is in the Okanagan. Was at the airport in Kelowna a few years back, saw him, and he made a very sarcastic comment about the Canucks. I forget what it was, but he definitely didn't seem like he's gonna be coming to Vancouver. Maybe Edmonton? That's my guess. Edmonton or Seattle.

    • Cheers 1
  3. So just assuming Nate Schmidt was on the move and the team didn't gel with him, trading him creates a hole on the back end we would have to hope Juolevi and Rathbone could fill. Edler may not even be coming back and even if he did, he's not gonna chew up the minutes he used to. Schmiddty playing the left side would be extremely important. Plus you have to lock up Quinn Hughes first, otherwise his contract could cost just as much as Jones'.

    • Cheers 1
  4. On 3/23/2021 at 2:24 PM, Elias Pettersson said:

    I’m not Jim. I’m Petey. I know you miss me. I’ll be back soon. I promise. :)

    I wish I could believe you...but on the off chance this actually is Petey, I hope this week off does the team well and that most of you get back and ready to go on Wednesday. Big push coming over April. My birthday is coming up and I wanna see some more Canucks playoff hockey!!

    • Upvote 1
  5. Ha! They're interested because they've always been interested and think they can get him on the cheap right now because he's struggling. The Preds are dangling Ekholm out there right now because he's on IR and a great top 4, but down on the depth chart behind Josi and likely won't be moving on up in the foreseeable future. Maybe they figure they can take Jake and Adam Gaudette from us for him. We need a right hander though. I don't see a fit.

  6. With Jake having a following with the Calgary Hitmen, I could see there being a want for it there. Bennett coming the other way though...that's hard to say.  I don't get the feeling he'd like Vancouver. I could see Toronto figuring something out. Maybe Bennett and a Dman go to Toronto for Nylander?

     

    Yup, Hanifin and Bennett for Willie Nylander. Maybe Toronto adds a lower tier dman making a mil or so? Maybe Bogosian? Bennett would be back with Gilmour. Toronto gets that right sided top 4 guy with offensive upside and Calgary gets more scoring punch. Calgary's taxi squad has a decent amount of Dmen on it. They can handle the loss for the right thing coming back.

  7. 1 hour ago, SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME said:

    Yeah, the amount has pretty much doubled with each lockout/agreement. I believe it was around $2.5M in 2013 and somewhere around $1M in 2005.

    Here's the thing though. How big would that number be if it didn't include the younger players who are in longer term contracts? Let's say longer than 2 years? That number is way overbloated with the McDavids, Matthews,  and Marners of the league. None of those guys with larger salaries ever make it to arbitration now. The last one was Shea Weber from what I remember. That goes back about 8 years or so. That rule is so outdated.

  8. 23 minutes ago, SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME said:

    The only thing that changes is the specific dollar amount.

     

    When "walk away rights" were introduced in 1995, the amount was $550,000.

     

    from the 1995 agreement:

      Hide contents

     


    12.6. Walk-Away Rights.

    (a) If a Club has elected to arbitrate a one year contract,
    and the award issued is for $550,000 or more per annum, then the
    Club may, within 72 hours after the award of the Arbitrator is
    issued (or if a Club has any other player still eligible for
    salary arbitration at that time and for whom a decision has not
    been rendered by an Arbitrator at that time, and the Club still
    has a walk-away right available to it in such League Year
    pursuant to paragraph (d) below, 72 hours after the award of the
    Arbitrator for such other player is issued), notify the player,
    the NHLPA and the NHL in writing that it does not intend to
    tender to the player a Player Contract based on the award as
    determined by the Arbitrator. Upon receipt of that notice, the
    player shall automatically be deemed to be an Unrestricted Free
    Agent, subject to the provisions of paragraphs (c) and (d) below.

    and

    (e) The dollar amount of $550,000 set forth in each of
    paragraphs (a) and (b) above, shall be increased on an annual
    basis at the same percentage rate of increase as the Average
    League Salary, with the commencement of the 1996/97 League Year
    being the first year such increase shall take effect. By way of
    example, if the Average League Salary on June 30, 1996 has
    increased by 10% from the Average League Salary on June 30, 1995,
    then the figure of $550,000 stated in paragraphs (a) and (b)
    above, shall be increased by 10% on June 30, 1996, and the
    ability of a Club to walk-away from an arbitration award rendered
    after June 30, 1996, shall be adjusted accordingly. For each
    League Year thereafter, a similar comparison and adjustment shall
    be made.
     

     

     

    The walk away number "shall be increased on an annual basis at the same percentage rate of increase as the Average League Salary."

     

    Today, that number is up to $4,538,958.

     

    Goes to show just how much average salary has increased since 1995.

     

     

    This is exactly what I mean. I didn't remember the walk away being so high. That amount is pretty high and I hope they revisit that in the next CBA. Some young players are much better coming out of the minors than they used to be in '95 and teams are locking them up to long term deals quicker. Maybe if point totals were factored into this, we could be looking at fairer cap numbers. Or just making it so teams can walk away at any number.

  9. 13 minutes ago, The Lock said:

    There is nothing in that statement that says the club cannot walk away from the awarded salary if less.

    I looked at this one statement from Cap Friendly. Although you're right, why put a dollar amount on the rule then. It makes no sense. It DID say clubs can not walk away from club elected arbitration. I feel like this was a change between this CBA and the last, which really sucks. Nobody is gonna want to give up anything for Virtanen with the amount of cap. We might have gotten something off Boston at one point. They have a decent amount of cap to play with, but right now, it's just kind of a crap situation. 

    • Cheers 1
  10. 13 minutes ago, Wanless said:
    • Player elected Arbitration Settlements of 1 year and greater than $4,538,958, Club can walk away from the awarded salary, making the player a UFA [CBA 12.10(a)]
    • Player elected Arbitration Settlements of 2 years and greater than $4,538,958, Club can walk away from the second (2nd) year of the awarded salary, making the player a UFA at the end of year 1 [CBA 12.10(b)]

     

    What I was getting at is Virtanen won't make over the 4.5 mil threshold for the Canucks to be able to walk away from

     

    The above statement was copy and pasted from capfriendly

    @Noseforthenet

    They must have changed that in the last CBA then.

×
×
  • Create New...