Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Enter Search Term. Use arrows to navigate between autocomplete results. If no results appear, use Enter to do a full site search.
Forum Closure ×
Canucks Community
Forum Closure

Adarsh Sant

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,702

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Adarsh Sant

    At Number 10 Who do we take?

    in Canucks Talk

    Posted

    On 4/9/2019 at 8:25 PM, GarthButcher5 said:

    Swing for the fences GMJB....I don't care how or what picks/players (excluding #43, 40, 53, and 6), need to be traded but get that number one from NJ.

     

    I'd like to see an epic Burky type move on the home court draft.

    We would almost certainly have to give up one of Q.Hughes, Horvat, Petey, or Boeser to move up to #1

    • Cheers 1

    Elias Pettersson | #40 | C

    in Current Roster

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, FS91 said:

    I like the look of your lines, very realistic opening night roster

     

    Virtanen, Horvat, Boeser 

    Baer, Pettersson, Eriksson

    Roussel, Sutter, Granlund

    Schaller, Beagle, Gagner

     

    Archibald 

     

    First injury call up depending on if it's for bottom 6 or top 6: Gaudette/Dahlen  

     

    4 minutes ago, aGENT said:

    (Barring trades), IMO Gagner's either on Baer/Pettersson's RW or 13thF (if not traded). Archibald's in Utica (along with Gaunce likely). Last spot goes to either Goldobin or Leipsic.

    This is probably the most realistic lineup. I wonder how many goals this lineup would score (if Eriksson remains terrible)? The offense basically would come from Horvat, Boeser, Baer and Pettersson. Virtanen/Hughes are also possibilities. 

    Elias Pettersson | #40 | C

    in Current Roster

    Posted

    2 hours ago, Alflives said:

    Hello...McFly...It's the Sabres... that's why!!!  :lol:

    Our guy, like Pettersson last draft, will turn out to be better.:towel:

    Go Bo Go!!!!

    Last year was completely different circumstances. There was no consensus #1.

     

    Dahlin wayyyy better than any other D man in this draft. You are too optimistic lol

    • Haha 1

    Elias Pettersson | #40 | C

    in Current Roster

    Posted

    2 hours ago, Alflives said:

    I wouldn't make that proposed trade (neither would the Sabres) even if it was Elias and switching picks with them.  I think the Dman we get at 7 (hoping for Hughs or Boquist) might - in 3 or 4 seasons - be better than Dahlin.  

    Lol you wouldn't dare say this if we landed the #1 pick. There's a reason that Dahlin is the first consensus #1 pick D man in a long time. Why the hell would Dahlin be ranked first in every single scouting service if Hughes or Boqvist will eclipse him in 3 or 4 seasons?? 

    Olli Juolevi | #48 | D

    in Alumni

    Posted

    1 hour ago, SuitnTie said:

     

    Man that’s disappointing. Hope this fires him up and comes to training camp ready to go. We need Olli to be that top 4 D. 

    Hutton, Stecher, Guddy, MDZ, Edler, Tanev, Biega, are all under contract. So unless we make a trade OJ will really need to show up for camp to earn himself a spot

    Elias Pettersson | #40 | C

    in Current Roster

    Posted

    2 hours ago, coastal.view said:

    so let's see

     

    brock

    elias

    dahlen

    gaudette

     

    i'm sure i overlooked some completely overachieving draft pick

    so fess up

     

    who did not want jb extended ??

    i was in the camp that believed jb is a good gm

    JB should be moved to head scout. He has very good scouting ability as you have shown.

    Loui Eriksson | #21 | LW/RW

    in Alumni

    Posted

    4 minutes ago, Rob_Zepp said:

    How do you handcuff a team if you leave 1/2 the league open?  A handcuff is what Kesler did.   Loui's clause can barely be considered a tissue wrap in comparison.

    If he picked teams that couldn't afford him or clearly didn't have a need for forwards to not put on his list it would make it real hard for Jimbo to trade him. Not impossible. But hard.

    Loui Eriksson | #21 | LW/RW

    in Alumni

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, Rob_Zepp said:

    He is an above average skater, yes he is.   He makes great outlet passes, have you keyed in on him during a game?   One of the reasons he worked with Sedins on big ice was same reason he didn't as well on NA surface.        As for the contract, his NM clauses expire before his contract does so if he really is as bad as you say he is, he won't be around for the entire contract.   

     

    Again, I disagree with your perspective on him but that is fine as you mutually do same to what I see.   I think he remains an effective NHL player, you don't.   World continues to spin.  :)

    He has to submit a 15-team no trade clause for the last 2 years. All he has to do is pick his teams right and it'll handcuff the Canucks in terms of trading him.

    The Rebuild Kicked Off With Acquiring Bo, & Was Completed at 2019 Draft!

    in Canucks Talk

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, oldnews said:

    What does any of that have to do with Boeser?

    You make an absurd leap from working on a trade to assuming he offered the Boeser pick?

    That's not a source - it's a blind assumption with literally no credibility.

    You have no idea what the substance of those negotiations were.  For all you know he offered Kevin Bieksa - who was actually otb - and Linden Vey.  Attempting to link that tweet to Boeser is laughable.  You're the one who should give it up - you have nothing there.

    It's really not that hard.

     

    Lucic went for a top defensive prospect and a 13th overall pick.

    Benning was quoted on saying he was "working hard an in on the deal for Lucic".

     

    He had to have offered something comparable to be in on the deal.

     

    If you think Bieksa and Vey is comparable to a top D prospect and the 13th overall pick then you don't know anything about hockey my friend.

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...