No. I was wrong. Thats what this place is for. Debating ideas. If im wrong, im wrong. And im wrong on this. I am actually wrong. I'm cool man. I just want to drink beer now. Cool., or are you going to keep going with this.
Adjust his point totals hes a good second pair on a good team like tampa. The problem with ranev is hes injury prone.
Boychuk is not a really a good comparable. You like to use dzone starts as a basis for showing that guddy isnt sheltered. Past couple of years hes had alot ozone starts. I can give you larsson or greene i guess.
He's a good second pairing defenseman on good teams. I never said he was third pairing. You brought that up, not me.
Now heres a question for you name a player thats similar to guddy who gets that type of money that is in 4-4.5 million range.
Is erik gudbranson worth as much money as tanev? We can do this all day and wont agree. Ill watch for the things you guys say he does once he comes back. Anyways im done the debate for the next while. It was fun and i learned something. Cheers
Meh. Its opinion.
I did look at other examples. It seams a good second pairing needs to produce 20 plus points too along with the solid d. I'm also trying to see your guys' side.