Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Isam

Members
  • Posts

    3,169
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Isam

  1. You're right. I actually wanted to leave this argument alone. I havent seen a player defended this much since sandlak.
  2. Dont kid youself alf . Hamonic is tough.
  3. Adjust his point totals hes a good second pair on a good team like tampa. The problem with ranev is hes injury prone. Boychuk is not a really a good comparable. You like to use dzone starts as a basis for showing that guddy isnt sheltered. Past couple of years hes had alot ozone starts. I can give you larsson or greene i guess.
  4. Ill give you that 4.8 mill in real money. Hits and fights. But he is having down year in offense and he doesnt have the dzone stats as guddy.
  5. He's a good second pairing defenseman on good teams. I never said he was third pairing. You brought that up, not me. Now heres a question for you name a player thats similar to guddy who gets that type of money that is in 4-4.5 million range.
  6. Is erik gudbranson worth as much money as tanev? We can do this all day and wont agree. Ill watch for the things you guys say he does once he comes back. Anyways im done the debate for the next while. It was fun and i learned something. Cheers
  7. And the ekholm deal is insane.
  8. Meh. Its opinion. I did look at other examples. It seams a good second pairing needs to produce 20 plus points too along with the solid d. I'm also trying to see your guys' side.
  9. 2nd pairing guys can score more then 15 points on aseason to season basis
  10. Been some good arguments from both sides in the last bit.
  11. 4.5 million is bigger cap hit then vlasic or ekholm.
  12. Hes not worth 4.5 million though. Too me hes good third pairing guy worth maybe around 2.5 to 3 million
  13. I totally agree. Jesus, they can be bad. Edler being the most noticeable
  14. See, I can say nice things about guddy too. The issue i have with guddy is does the good things outweigh the bad.
  15. You can make a case for the philly game also.
  16. I think there is value in the pk dept with guddy. I remember the analytics backing that up
  17. But im going to leave this topic alone and will try to watch guddy from your guy's view and see if i learn something.
  18. Both sides Im going to ask a question. Is gudbranson so intimidating that he alters these guys playing style? To me no. Maybe it does to you
  19. Fair enough. To tell you truth im tired of arguing about guddy. Theres going to be so called stats nerds like me who think hes dragging the d down and theres going to be guys like you who argue that his physicality opens spots for the more skilled player. Both sides probably arent going to agree anytime soon so yeah and stuff.
  20. Johnson is right on that. Kid is a little on the nasty side. Once he gets bigger he'll start to get meaner or more agressive.
  21. Just the one assist. He shot it of the crossbar
  22. Vaxjo seems to be trying the canucks strategy of defending the tie with the lead.
×
×
  • Create New...