- Popular Post
-
Posts
1,818 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Lonny_Bohonos_14
-
-
No. Way. Love it!
-
Boldy is my choice. Think they go with Krebs
-
Boom. Broberg gone
-
9 minutes ago, oldnews said:
yes - but when you think about it, even where Edler's best interests are concerned, if he wants to stay in Vancouver, this way he is not vulnerable to the expansion draft - so he's free to re-sign here and neither require protection, nor take the risk of having to spend a year or two in Seattle or whereever they may have elected to deal him if the selected him.
2 years in the end may be preferable to Edler - it also inches up his cap hit (although he still took a discount) - and he maintains control over his future.
I always thought that this was the best way to get around the expansion draft and made the most sense for everyone. Added bonus that this expires at the same time Petty and Hughes new contracts will kick in. Just works for everyone.
- 2
-
Good for Karlsson. Not sure how SJS will manage the cap hit though.
- 1
- 3
-
59 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said:
I wonder how far that will drop him. That's a tough injury to come back from, he might not be the same player when he comes back.
-
I am really hoping we can move up our 2nd pick into the 20s. No idea what the cost would be to move up 15ish picks, but if we can make it happen it would be great to to grab a forward at 10 and then one of the remaining defence men there.
- 1
-
17 hours ago, Kootenay Gold said:
That player was / is a very good pick for CBJ. Pierre Luc Deblois was way up there on my wish list for the Canucks to pick too.
Wasn't PLD the guy Montreal wanted for Subban? I don't think PLD being a Canuck was ever in the cards.
-
7 minutes ago, Canuck Surfer said:
Cozens could be there at 10?
Benning better run up to the podium to select him then. Cozens is one of the few guys that could slot into the lineup next year
- 2
-
Boucher is an interesting case. I think he's good enough to get an NHL two way deal from someone, but likely just as a depth piece. He probably passes through waivers.
I expect the canucks to qualify him, just to keep him away from other teams, and assign him back to Utica.
-
Interesting take by Button. Has us taking Harley, whom I haven't heard much about yet. Passing on Krebs and Turcotte
-
15 minutes ago, VegasCanuck said:
This is still the Tryamkin thread isn't it? Did Someone change it and I just missed it???
I'm just rolling with the topic on hand..
- 1
-
39 minutes ago, theo5789 said:
Generally players ask for more than their worth in arbitration than what they're expecting while the team goes low, so they end up where they generally expect. I don't think Ceci has blown the expectations out of the water since last season, so I can see him signing a longer term deal (5-7 years) at around 5-5.5 million with possibly no clauses.
He averaged over 22 mins of ice time including the majority of the PK time on defense on an atrocious team. So he's probably played too many minutes than what type of player he is (probably 2-3 mins more ice time on average than he would on a better team) and he had the hardest assignments, so it's easy to say that he's been exposed, but in a better system he might look far better. Adding a guy like Ceci could make someone like Tanev more expendable to get younger and recoup some loss that we gave up to acquire Ceci.
Acquiring Ceci doesn't really get him away from the high TOI, especially if we trade Tanev. Then he's still our "top" RHD defenseman on the depth chart and will be playing more than he should. If we do keep Tanev, its better, but we have to account for the time Tanev is likely to miss with injury, where Ceci will be forced into higher minutes.
If we're looking at a similar assest price for Ceci as we saw for Guddy, plus the extension which I would guess would be in the $5.5 range, wouldn't it be better to just spend the cash on someone like (only as an example) myers?
I'm not completely against getting Ceci for the right price, but if Ottawa sees him as a top 4 and wants that kind of return, plus the contract for a top 4, then I think we can find better value elsewhere.
I haven't watch much of him, so my opinion is based on what I hear from those who have. I also remember reading a CA article a while back the compared Ceci to Guddy quite closely. So, I'm not high on him to say the least.
-
I'd say to stay away from Ceci. A couple of my friends are big Sens fans and they all say he is constantly their worst defender. Plus in his last arbitration he was asking for $6m.
At that price and what it would cost to acquire him, we're better off going in another direction.
- 3
-
28 minutes ago, stawns said:
For a guy who has already snubbed his nose at the team that drafted him and the team that traded for him. He clearly has his eyes on a specific team to land on.
25 minutes ago, The Lock said:And if we're not one of the teams he wants to sign with, we lose a 3rd as a result.....
Obviously the deal would be contingent on us signing him. If we're not on his list, then no deal, but we have a hole on the right side that he can step right into, Vancouver is a beautiful city and we have some young, exciting players that we're building around.
I'm not saying is going to happen, or even likely, but I think it's a good fit for all parties.
-
Since we're on the topic of Fox, I'd love Benning dangle a third for him. Maybe Goldobin and a late pick gets it done.
Would help shore* up out right side and give Rathbone a connection to the team.
-
Besides Hughes and Kakko, who are the guys that could step in next year?
I have a feeling that if JB is feeling his job is on the line, he may go for someone that can jump in right away to help toe the line of rebuilding and stay "competitive"..
- 1
-
Nice finish to the season for Madden. Another year of college, then the A. Then he could be ready to jump into a 4th line role with pety, bo and gauds ahead of him.
- 1
-
Usually I don't have an issue with size (and I know I'm beating a dead horse) but 5'7 is small. And at 20 years old, he's not likely to grow. At least if he was 18 there's a shot of him growing an inch or two, but now, not so much. I think there would have been better plays to target for a boom or bust pick with this pick.
With that said, I'm rooting for him all the way. Hope he can prove the majority of us wrong about his size. He's certainly skilled enough that he could be utilized as a specialty forward and still be effective in the new NHL
-
Glad we got to grab a couple of high profile D this year. 2019 looks to be stacked with centres. Should be able to grab a good one in the top 10.
Obviously Hughes would be fantastic.
-
11 hours ago, Bigturk8 said:
DiPietro had a pretty lengthy interview on 31 thoughts with Freidman. Interview starts at 49:30.
He's really well spoken, definitely worth a listen. Hard not to like the guy and his drive.
-
-
2 hours ago, guntrix said:
If we take either one of Mittelstadt, Glass or Heiskanen we won't regret it.
Tolvanen will be this year's Larkin.
You heard it here first.
If we manage to get a pick in the early teens he would definitely be one guy I would hope we grab.
-
Good thing Casey is heading to uni. He'll have lots of time to hit the gym and build up his strength.
- 4
[GDT] 2019 NHL Entry Draft
in General Hockey Discussion
Posted
I never got the fear. Love the pick. Anyone available at our pick was going to need 2 years anyways. I'm stoked