NucksCup2015

How is big Bostn doing against small fast Montreal? It's not all about size Stop trolling

read the post above yours numpty troll

I'd prefer Ehlers with the 6 or one of the expected top 5 if one drops then Fleury or Ritchie at 10

Oh I agree, i'm just saying if we move him like so many on here are so eager to do, we need to make a trade like for it to at least sense vs tanev and our pick to get 3rd or first only

How about a realistic Tanev move? Tanev and six to Edmonton or Florida for a winger of equivalent value (not sure who that is in FLA) and their pick Edmonton for instance Tanev and #6 for Yakupov and #3 Yakupov has the skills to play and can be game breaker just needs to be coached better so we get what we are looking for and still can move up to get Reinhart/Bennett/Dal Colle Edmonton gets a young dman that will fit in nicely but has proven he is much further along than their group. Prefer to move Edler, but he wouldnt waive and likely be asked for Tanev

mobility

Alex Stojanov says hi

I agree with you. I mentioned the same earlier, and you just have to look at alot of players in their draft year and realize they will grow! When I was 17/18 I was 5'11 165, pretty much the same size. By 20 I was 6'1 close to 195ish....2 years, and I gained strength and speed and it was simply just growth, and working out (nothing special) He will grow....all they have to do is meet the parents, get an idea of dad and mom's size and realize the kid will likely grow more than them, that's usually what happens Imagine if Ottawa has said a 5'11 165 lb defenseman named Karlson was too small? and he was a defenseman!

he is a troll

Quote by Hughson during the mtl/bos game a few mins ago "The say the one thing the Bruins may have problems with is a team with great speed" So...do we want only lumberjacks?

Lets just all pray together that WHOMEVER we pick ends up being a star in the NHL and we'll all be happy! yes?

he'll eventually get his, someone is going to hurt him eventually

This whole debate over Ritchie/Virtanen/Ehlers in my mind comes down to risk/reward In MY OPINION and that's all it is, opinion 1. After Ekblad/Reinhart/Dal Colle/ Bennett the risk of flop increases dramatically 2. I think all those 4 players should find a way to become NHL players and contribute in some form or another to warrant why they were taken in the top 5-6 3. Draisaitl is one of those potential hit or miss players alot of risk because of his skating but he did put up alot of points alone. 4. Then we get out of the standard top 5 and our fine mess 5. In that fine mess, I look at this like I look at decisions as a business person. If I am taking a risk, I need to try and quantify that risk and the resultant return. I should if I am smart, want to minimize risk and maximize return. 6. Where most people debating here differ is simply in their assessment of risk amongst the players, we all have differing views based off what we categorize as more important (size, speed, hands, hockey iq, intensity, etc etc). 7. Since I don't see any way to accurately determine if any person's view of assessing risk is better or not since, drafting is a crap shoot, a simple assumption would be these players we're debating are all equally risky given different definitions of that risk. 8. Then I look at return, I ask who has the highest ceiling as this is a little easier to determine, still fraught with assumptions on what is more valuable to us (but this is where I pointed to the issue that our prospect pool has alot of size but lacks the upside gamebreakers). If you look at return from this perspective, this leads me say Ehlers is the best bet. Again, this is because I am of the opinion that: A - We have alot of size in our prospect pool B - Size/Projects are easier to find later in the draft and elite skill is not. C - We only have Shinkruk in that group that MAY or MAY NOT become an elite game changer. Kassian a maybe if he keeps developing but in a different manner (not the key goal but someone who may contribute to it). Jensen and Horvat, great support players who will be key parts but unlikely they will be the 'go to guy' That's the way I look at things and this is why absent a move up to get Reinhart/Bennett or Dal Colle we should go with most TALENT available, where size isn't an impediment. And we should consider the group when making the decision and lets remember Ehlers' not a munchkin/schroeder either.

it actually is bro....have you been there? it sucks

Move up and get Reinhart/Bennett or Dal Colle and we can all hold hands and sing Kumbaya! With our luck though, we'll move up and take Draisaitl and this will all start again!!! oh the misery of being a Canucks fan!! our team sucks so bad now we're arguing over kids who are expected to be our saviour but likely never will!!! hahahahhaa