SwedishCrowns Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 funny i think that could be said about any goalie that has played for any extended period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenDrinkin Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 There was a lot of net to shoot at on the OT winner, but let's face it, goaltending was not the issue this year. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'NucK™ Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 There was a lot of net to shoot at on the OT winner, but let's face it, goaltending was not the issue this year. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucksnihilist Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 any goaltender can be beaten up high. because they can't butterfly across the top of the net. it was a great shot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suolucidir Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Perfect shot on a 2on1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tm085 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 If it was Lu, We would never make it into OT, We would have lost into regulation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VMR Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 How many people when they saw it thought wow what a weak goal for an OT winner. In game 4 people were saying that Lu would have never made the penalty shot save, but on the flip side it is fair to say that Lu wouldn't have been scored on like that in an OT. Interesting in the media that what seems clearly a bad goal has not been called that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeDreamOfStanley Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 He had to because there was still a pass option!!!!! I wish more people played goalie even casually so they wouldn't be so clueless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schneider Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 lmao it was a 2 on 1 and he roofed it right over his shoulder. are u nuts? schneider can't stop everything, especially 2 on 1s with a perfect shot finish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMKL Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 How many people when they saw it thought wow what a weak goal for an OT winner. In game 4 people were saying that Lu would have never made the penalty shot save, but on the flip side it is fair to say that Lu wouldn't have been scored on like that in an OT. Interesting in the media that what seems clearly a bad goal has not been called that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one-x Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 And this, ladies and gentlemen is why the Vancouver Canucks are called a goaltending graveyard. Point a finger at the goalie and there are 3 pointing back right at you. Luongo? Schneider? Lack? Doesn't matter. None of them will be good enough for any of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMKL Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Can you do better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soshified Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 The OP wasnt trying to blame Schneider. He just said it was a soft goal and if Luongo was in net, Lu would have save it. The OP also mentioned if Luongo was to allow that OT goal, fans and media will rip apart Luongo. Just my personal view on this topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guesswhere Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 Salo was caught flat on the play, didn't take away the pass as the other King was wide open for the 1 timer, Schneids and any goalie for that matter has to respect that play aswell. I can't remember which game it was in when the commentators were commenting on the perfect execution on the 2 on 1 by the kings defenseman to eliminate any cross ice pass, enabling Quick to focus solely on the shooter, making it a much easier save to make. The shot was a rocket, and Schneids was deep, but he also had to respect the high probability that that pass was going cross ice considering Salo was so indecisive on the play and put himself in a position that was entirely beneficial to the both Kings players on that 2 on 1. Salo might aswell have not even been there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dKs89 Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 But many of the previous 26 saves Lu may not have had and ther ewouldn't have been an OT. That whole argument is just ridiculous! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wesley Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 Great, Schneider bashing has already started. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resiliency Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 This is exactly why Vancouver fans are the most hated fans in the league. I wouldn't be surprised if both Luongo and Schneider are driven out of town. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alt kilgore Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 Bring...............back................the...............minus boutton! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bananian Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 So we want to run Schneider out of town already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bananian Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 Honestly guys, not blaming Schneider AT ALL, he was the reason it went to OT, but seriously, Lu would have saved that particular shot. I think that was what the OP was getting at. Lu is bigger, and covers more of the net, all he would have to do is move his glove a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.