ronthecivil Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 That's only one of the patents. If those things were not necessary for the Galaxy to sell, they wouldn't been stolen in the first place. Point is, Samsung had strategy meetings to copy the iPhone, and did so by infringing on their patents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthecivil Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 Using your example, they can create better motors and fridges (assuming the original patents on them expired) but they can't just steal the apple door handle and put it on their fridges, because they are patented. The point is that Samsung fridges wouldn't sell if they didn't have apple door handles, and they know it, which is why they stole it in the first place and had strategy meetings about copying apples design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shift-4 Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 (which gives me an idea for some pretty good Samsung ads featuring a rotten one.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grapefruits Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 Hahaha ^^^ nice! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.