Posted 25 March 2013 - 01:25 PM
Considering they traded James Neal AND Matt Niskanen for Goligoski, I'm sure Edler is even value for Eriksson. I see it as we loose something big to gain something big. Thoughts?
Posted 25 March 2013 - 02:17 PM
Not sure why Dallas would be looking to bring back a pending UFA... take Higgins out and add a 3rd or 4th or mid level prospect and I like it.
Posted 25 March 2013 - 02:36 PM
Posted 25 March 2013 - 05:21 PM
Posted 25 March 2013 - 05:37 PM
Posted 25 March 2013 - 06:02 PM
One day some of us will look back on the year and look at the chicago, and most of us will realize that it was a small bump in the road to the cup
WIN THE CUP FOR SALO CAMPAIGN
Posted 26 March 2013 - 12:21 AM
not happening Edler is untouchable.......we can't trade him
Nobody is untouchable if the right deal comes along. If sure if MG was offered this he wouldn't turn it down
Posted 26 March 2013 - 12:37 PM
But the price is too high.... dont want to trade Eddie for him
Credit to -Vintage Canuck-
Posted 26 March 2013 - 01:35 PM
Good proposal op and the quoted iis great too.
Good hockey trade... they might not want higgy and I rather keep him for the playoffs. Can't we give picks or prospects
Doesn't eddy have a ntc tho?
The NHL is a fixed old boys club. I've come to acceptance with that and just watch for entertainment. The 2011 & 2012 Canucks are champs in my books.
THE CANUCKS ARE THE SINGLE, GREATEST SPORTS FRANCHISE OF ALL TIME. GO CANUCKS GO