Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

hobart16

Members
  • Posts

    1,814
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by hobart16

  1. The other thing that might be worth looking at is creating power play opportunities.  VIrtanen has done a lot of that lately (drawing penalties and  not taking as many as he used to).  The last few games he has been using his speed to break teams down.  He has probably been our best forward when it comes to picking up the puck either in our end or just in the center zone and immediately putting the other team on its heels.  A lot of times he will come down and rifle a shot from the dot area that is saved.  It would be nice to see him driving the net  a little more and maybe getting a good outside in move.  Too often he settles for a fairly low % shot and he doesn't generate as many rebounds as maybe he should either.  But a lot of times he is just outrunning his own line mates, going in alone.  

    • Upvote 1
  2. On 3/11/2017 at 7:30 AM, Gooseberries said:

    I watched the first period last night. Obviously demko was amazing. But what shocked me and I seen it mentioned on cdc yet is his puck handling.  He handles the puck alot. And he's damn good at it. Not like smith/Brodour alot but miles better than Luongo/Schneider 

    Good observation, I never really focused on this but since you posted this I realize how right you are.  Makes it so much easier for D to break out if the goalie can pass the puck well.  

  3. He looked very good last night until he got sick and withdrew for the third period.  I would definitely not give up on the guy he looked like a man among boys out there last night.  Once he gets some finish he is going to be an asset to the Canucks.  

    • Upvote 3
  4. Wish I could have gone to game tonight to see how he did.  Sounds like it was a good one but PP going 1 for 6 isn't so hot I guess.  He has the big righty shot on that unit like Ovechkin for the Caps.  If he can produce something from there he will speed his trip to the bigs

  5. I guess so.  Miller is so much better when he is fresh, and I have faith in Marky, but I think Friday's game is so critical you have to go with the vet who is coming off two very good performances.  

  6. I've watched the replay of the weinerdog goal 10 times and Murphy had two steps and the angle on Bo, and he gets beat by 2 steps in a race from half ice.  And forget the other defenseman.  He gets beat by 5 steps from just over the red line.  Bo waits and shifts into that extra gear after Murphy picks his angle.  Not a ton of players out there who have that sense and that extra gear. 

  7. 2 hours ago, Hutton Wink said:

     

    Pretty simple really.  Weber and Bartkowski are gone, Edler's been injured, and Sbisa has stepped up.

     

    Someone's gotta take the whippin'.

    ah, just his turn 

  8.  

    59 minutes ago, canuckistani said:

     

    Less than a year ago, Gudbransson was the most important Panther defence man in the playoffs. You don't go from being the most important defence man in a playoff team to useless in a bottom feeder team in less than a year when you are not even 25. Its more than likely that Guddy is having a slow adjustment to the Western Conference style of hockey and needs some time figuring things out, with a better defensively capable partner than our weakest defensive defence man (Ben Hutton), who is just a weaker version of Erhoff. 

     

    Couldn't agree more.  I don't get the criticism of Gudbranson.  He is a consistent, physical presence on a team that is not known for bruising their opponents, and he has some upside.  As the game is changing, he can probably drop a little weight and improve his quickness.  With Stecher coming on you have to balance that with some beef.  Tryamkin certainly fills that bill too but he needs more seasoning and does not play with the consistency of Gud.  

    • Upvote 1
  9. 19 hours ago, Alflives said:

    And he turns the wrong we sometimes too.  He's just not a very quick skater in the transition from backward to forward, and visa versa.  But he will be our D guy exposed to expansion do it's okay.

    Can't agree with that.  It's true he turned the wrong way once and it cost us, but he is a top skater.  He gets up into the rush and back faster than anyone else in our D corps.  That, along with maxing out his physicality, got him into the league.  If he could get a shot going he would be getting more games and minutes.  Makes sense to expose him in expansion of course. 

  10. On 12/24/2016 at 1:27 AM, ShakyWalton said:

    I thought he got beat a lot tonight and out muscled as well.

    And I've noticed a lot of stick skill mistakes, which I don't remember seeing in the past either.  Not horrible plays but as a pro and a smaller guy he just has to handle the puck when it comes to him.  

     

     

    • Upvote 1
  11. 5 hours ago, WeneedLumme said:

    Yeah, you'd like that, wouldn't you. I bet you'd also like Stecher back, too. Lol.

    second no brainer!  Hansen on conditioning stint while you're feeling generous 

  12. Gaunce has been good on the boards, has good face off, takeaway and hits numbers this year.  He has even scrapped on occasion if memory serves.  He dropped a little weight and his skating is improved but his offense is non existent right now, that is the issue.  Chaput has played pretty well too and has probably given a bit more offensively so it is a toss up between them.    

     

    The proof will be in what happens when Rodin comes up.  Who gets sent back?  Everybody has to pass through waivers I believe.  Would you risk losing Gaunce in waivers?   That would be a shame if that happens.  

  13. On 11/27/2016 at 2:19 PM, Lancaster said:

    I am a bit disappointed with the lack of playing time that Gaunce (and the rest of the 4th line) received yesterday.  He's a defensively reliable player that is good at face-offs..... so he should have at least been out on the PK.  Considering yesterday was the 2nd of the back-to-back, you'd assume that WD would have rolled 4 lines more.

     

    Just in case someone mentions it, I don't believe the "Canucks had to protect the 1-0 lead".... since with that philosophy... you'll never play him when you're tied, when you're also down by 1-2.... meaning the only good time to play him would be if the Canucks were up or down by 5. 

    good call, 4th line made you look smart against Tampa Bay tonight.  I agree with this entirely particularly given the liability Sedins can be on D

×
×
  • Create New...