CanucksCountry
-
Posts
1,133 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by CanucksCountry
-
-
Think King should be looked at for being replaced, power play has been bad all year
-
Just now, Canucklehead53 said:
I didn't see the first goal against, please tell me it was pretty...or is another 'average at best' DEMKO.
I sure miss robbery DEMKO
2on1 myers grossly miss played it and made it for an easy back door tap in no goalie was saving it
-
I thought tonight was another good game for Petey, the kid is looking like the superstar we know and love once again
-
1
-
-
Even though we didn't look good tonight once again the PK sunk the ship had they been better it could have been winnable
-
Wreally a flying elbow to the head isn't a call but sticking up for your teammate is
-
2 minutes ago, Jack Fig said:
That's a lot of crowd response for a 7-3 goal.
Tbf that was a really nice goal
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I think the Boeser dogs are faster than brock on the ice
-
1
-
4
-
1
-
I've tried to be positive all year but I just can't anymore what's with lack of effort anyone who just floats in these games needs to get traded
-
Sold that pretty hard
-
I don't think I've ever been this annoyed after a win king needs to get canned and the lack of effort on the 4th goal was horrible
-
Just now, Nuck1991 said:
this team just needs major overhaul
Maybe on the special teams outside of that no not really
-
1
-
-
Like the message of this just wish dumba wasn't involved guy is a clown
-
2 minutes ago, Chicken. said:
Sutter update??
More then likely won't play at all this season
-
-
-
I don't see how this help us at all, it seems like we are just rewarding someone while hurting our goaltending depth for some reason, there is questions of 6ft0 Mikey DiPietro being to small let alone being 5ft7. being a goalie at that size in any type of pro league is beyond a risk for the club they would be with, not to mention even in goaltending the men's game is vastly different to play
-
6 hours ago, mll said:
Rutherford might not see Garland as part of the team going forward. Rachel Doerrie worked for NJD under Hynes and would have insight on Zacha.
Doerrie really doesn't have alot of say in terms of the team, as far as JR i doubt it Bruce seems to really like Garland but JR was also quoted saying they really aren't looking to move one of the scorers so i doubt Garland is on the way out
-
1
-
1
-
-
50 minutes ago, Dazzle said:
There is definitely a ton of bias in this market. I think Garland has been a great pickup for the Canucks, but some people think Garland is not a great fit (ridiculous).
I agree i wouldn't move him unless it was a stupid offer not too guy is a warrior and creates alot of space and is a huge pest, cant be same said for Zacha
-
9 minutes ago, mll said:
They add but not massively. The Canucks are interested in Zacha as explained by Marek in the clip posted - ie Vancouver sees something of value in him that interests them.
we can be interested in a player and still not trade a guy like Garland for him, I really do think the devils add alot Zacha hasn't been great this year and a lot of people still think he is good just because he was drafted high
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, mll said:
He's their 3rd most used forward. Doesn't feel like he's someone they just want to dump but might be the cost to get Garland.
i severely doubt it, Garland is the better player despite having less ice time and really sturs the pot for us, Devlis would have to add massively, like Marek said he is more than likely going to walk next offseason, don't see why would trade the cost controlled winger on a good contract for that
-
2
-
-
53 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said:
You're getting a bag of pucks for those 3 guys, maybe less, not Paval Zacha...
Zacha is another reclamation project is the issue, there is a reason the devils want to dump him, a deal around a 2nd round pick being the center of it should be enough to get it done
-
Just now, DeNiro said:
I think like others have said if we’re trading them Garland it would be for Zacha+.
How much that plus is would be the question. We definitely need a third line center though. Can we get a good young D out of it too?
the issue most of the Devils D are LHD outside of Walsh or Severson it doesn't make sense imho rather make a hockey trade here and not play magic beans with a prospect imho, though i'd also trade Rathbone for a RHD
-
I think lots of us here are over valuing Zacha, guys like Boeser and Garland won't be involved, you probably could get a deal done with the likes of our 2023 2nd Dickinson and Adain McDonough, like Jeff Marek said the Devils will probably lose him for nothing next offseason, Garland is cost controlled for the next 4 years and brings a spark, trading out Boeser is a good way to piss off Pettersson and Hughes and Horvat, if the Devils are asking about anyone in our top 6 we should simply hang up
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
-
Zacha would be great depending on the cost
-
1
-
[GDT] Mondray Flebruarry 21, 22: Sea-Addled Squids (51-16-31-4=36) @ Vancabularry Canucks-better-win-this-gimme-game-or-elses (51-23-22-6=52) 7:00 Our Time SN TV AM650
in Canucks Talk
Posted
I agree it seems like he is just reading off from Browns notebook he left behind and has them some how doing it worse