Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

VforVasili

Members
  • Posts

    2,003
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by VforVasili

  1. I feel like the real audience for all of this talk by Rutherford is ownership. He probably feels like they need to make changes like firing the coaching staff, buying out OEL and burying some contracts but probably is getting resistance to ponying up the cash to do so. 

     

    So he will keep on saying this in order to have his "I told you so" moment once ownership realizes there will be a price to be paid for fixing the mistakes of the previous regime.

     

     

    • Sad 1
  2. 5 minutes ago, AV. said:

    Lol provoke?  Because I called the franchise the dumbest one in the league?  That I said we should have claimed this type of player on waivers rather than trading for him?

    Unless you work for the management, you, nor anybody here, should have any reason to take offence from a post like this, especially when I didn't even call out anybody specific.  Believe me, there's tons of room in this world for people to be empathetic toward one another and be mindful of invalidating feelings, but this is not one of them.

    I am curious what your theory is as to why your post took all the abuse when 11 other posters within the first two pages criticized the move and did not get any such response? 
     

    Random chance?

    Personal vendettas?

     

    Or maybe it just seemed like trolling whether that was your intention or not. 

    • Cheers 3
  3. 14 minutes ago, Master Mind said:

    There are people who go after users with any criticisms of the team.

     

    Again though, ridiculous comparison that you were making.

    Out of interest I looked over the first two pages of this thread. There were a total of 12 posts that I would say were negative toward this trade. And yet only one or two got all the reactions from the posters you are complaining about. How could that be? 
     

    A self-reflective person might draw some conclusions about their own communication skills rather than complaining that they were being silenced. 

    • Thanks 1
    • Cheers 2
  4. 1 minute ago, AV. said:

    One post from one user, in which he was saying that line in response to a comment about there being "haters" doing their usual bit. 

    The gist of his message is what you should be reading into, anyway.  For any given move that happens with this team, there are two sides.  Those that like it and those that don't.  Guess which side makes it a habit to tell the other side just how wrong they are, how vile they are, how negative, how toxic, how fake, etc?  Consider that for a moment.

    Hope this helps.

    Pretty ironic for the guy whose first post in this thread was pure over the top trolling. 

     

    Not sure what else to call a post that provokes a dozen responses that amount to the wtf meme. 
     

    Hope this helps. 

    • Cheers 2
    • Upvote 1
    • Vintage 1
×
×
  • Create New...