Canuck or Die

Bruins are trash! Go Detroit!

Moving up one or two spots means we won't have to trade a boatload to get that pick, and we can then pick either Dal Colle or Draistl.

Whoever ends up with the 4th or 5th picks, and if we get 6th, we should try to move up to 4th or 5th. We need to get someone form the top 5.

What about 4th?

Yeah, but with a Carolina win, we are guaranteed 6th, then I can cheer for the Canucks to destroy the pathetic lames.

6the or 7th will be ours. Hoping Canes win tomorrow.

I hope we lose tomorrow or Carolina wins, then package that 6th over for a top 5 pick. It shouldn't take an enormous deal to move up a couple spots, right?

So, if we are picking 6th or 7th, who would we be taking? Who would be available. We also still have a chance at first overall, even if it is a small one.

Man, I'm kind of hoping we lose, that means we are guaranteed 6th or 7th pick.

We never had a chance at #5. That's been said multiple time.

And we have been going to the playoffs every year the stars have missed it. So, in other words, you are full of crap, just like always. Come back when you learned to use your brain.

If he is so awesome, why didn't he get them in the playoffs in previous seasons, genius?

Calgary never was going to pass us even if they won. We have the tie-break on them. The best we could do is 6th.

I'll cheer for the habs just to watch Laffs cry even more.

Sharts are trash. I hate the queens, but I want them to destroy the sharts!

Of course winning the cup is what matters. But since you want to compare the Canucks with your laffs, don't get upset when people point out that we have done better than your team. The fact is, no, we haven't been complete failures, and telling yourself otherwise won't make it true. We have seen success compared to your team. If you don't like that, then maybe you should stop trying to lump us in with your team. After all, 2nd best is still better than where Toronto constantly finishes. I'd still rather be the Canucks than your team right now.

I hope they take their time with finding a GM. They have a couple of months before the draft. I'd rather wait until after the playoffs and see the list of candidates. With where we are as a franchise at the moment, we need a GM who has some experience and success building a team through the draft.

No, buddy, we actually haven't. We've had more success over the last 40 years than your laffs have. At least we played for the cup on three occasions, won a couple of president's trophies, and multiple individual awards. That's some success right there. Deal with it.

Aww, isn't this cute? The butthurt one thinks he's being all tough and clever.

Yeah, you're not actually that clever. But, this is typical of laffs fans. Unlike Phaneuf and Kessel, and contrary to the flack they get on here, the Sedins have actually carried this team. They are much better leaders than you have, and they are much better than they are currently given credit for. Deal with it. Kessel may be a goal scorer, and he can be what an already contending team needs to get over the hump, but he is not the player you lean on for leadership. Same with Phaneuf. Doing so will mean another decade of no playoffs.

Well, if he's such an awesome franchise player, he should have put your garbage team on his back and carried them to the post-season. But he didn't. I'd still take the twins over Kessel any day. But, whatever helps you sleep at night.

No, he's not. But keep believing your delusions, buddy.

Funny, I can say the same about you. But, keep crying. I love how butthurt you are at being owned.

This is what happens when you have players like Kessel and Phaneuf leading your team. They are not franchise players. They are complimentary players at best who help bolster teams that are already contenders.

Why, because he seems to be popular for no reason on CDC?