Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Bigturk8

Members
  • Posts

    1,399
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Bigturk8

  1. Virtanen Barging His Way onto Canucks Roster

     

     

    The Vancouver Canucks have faced a lot of questions stemming from the 2014 NHL Entry Draft when they selected Jake Virtanen sixth overall in the first round. Since then, players chosen after Virtanen like the Toronto Maple Leafs’ William Nylander, the Winnipeg Jets’ Nikolaj Ehlers and the Detroit Red Wings’ Dylan Larkin have established themselves as quality top-line NHL players.

    Jake-Virtanen-e1403960953261-300x300.jpg

    Jake Virtanen, sixth overall pick, 2014 NHL Draft (Bill Streicher-USA TODAY Sports)

    He is the first British Columbian selected by the Canucks in the first round since Cam Neely in 1983 – no pressure kid. And now just three years later, some question if Virtanen has a future with the Canucks.

    Virtanen spent the majority of the 2016-17 season in the American Hockey League with the Utica Comets after making the Canucks as a 19-year-old in 2015-16. In my roster prediction prior to training camp, I had Virtanen as a candidate for the Canucks 14th forward, and that was before the team signed unrestricted free agent Thomas Vanek. The addition of another veteran forward, albeit one who plays the opposite wing, didn’t bode well for Virtanen’s chances on cracking the Canucks opening night roster.

    That said, the 21-year-old from Abbotsford may have the inside track on claiming a regular roster spot on the Canucks.

    The Benefits of NHL experience

    Although Virtanen spent most of last season in the minors, he already has one NHL regular season under his belt. He endeared himself big time to Canucks fans in his rookie year, scoring some highlight reel goals and throwing some big checks.

    After putting up seven goals and leading the team in Corsi-for percentage, it looked like he had arrived and was ready to take the mantle as the next star power forward for the Canucks like Trevor Linden, Todd Bertuzzi and others before him. The year of NHL experience in 2015-16 was invaluable for Virtanen, despite not getting plum ice time assignments for a player with his combination of speed, size and skill.

    Anything that could go wrong did at the start of last season – whether the missteps were Virtanen’s doing or not. He showed up at training camp at a hulking 231 pounds, got hurt during the pre-season and only played ten games with the Canucks before being sent to the AHL. With a new coaching staff for the Canucks, Virtanen has a bit of a chance to start with a clean slate.

    Familiar with New Coaching Staff

    One thing attractive to the Canucks in promoting Travis Green from the Comets was the fact that he was familiar with a number of players coming up through the team’s prospect pool — Virtanen is one of those prize prospects. He had a disappointing season in 2016-17 with the Comets, only putting up 19 points in 65 games and finishing minus-11.

    Jake Virtanen

    (Bob Frid-USA TODAY Sports)

    However, for Virtanen to be encouraged about his career path thus far, he only needs to look at Green’s playing career. Green was a 51 goal scorer in the Western Hockey League during his draft year, but ended up carving out a 14-year NHL career as a versatile, defensively-responsible forward. He also had a career high of 70 points in 1995-96 with the New York Islanders.

    Green and new Canucks assistant coach Nolan Baumgartner were very positive influences on Virtanen last season. They helped show him the little things a player needs to do to be a successful everyday NHL player. Green and Baumgartner’s familiarity with Virtanen should benefit him, but so should his familiarity with them.

    At times in the past, it seemed that now-former Canucks coach Willie Desjardins wasn’t sure how to handle Virtanen’s development. He was a healthy scratch for stretches at a time and didn’t get the opportunity to skate with players that complemented Virtanen’s skill set.

    When he did play with complementary players, he showed the flashes that made him such a high draft pick. The line of Virtanen, Bo Horvat and Sven Baertschi was excellent at times during in the 2015-16 season and looked ready to terrorize the opposition. It’s up to Green to find a similar fit for Virtanen now that he’s promoted to Canucks bench boss. It’s also up to Virtanen to show that his play last season was an anomaly.

    Sven-Baertschi.jpg?resize=575%2C384&ssl=

    Sven Baertschi formed a potent line for the Canucks with Virtanen and Bo Horvat in 2015-16 (Amy Irvin / The Hockey Writers)

    Virtanen Simply Looks Ready

    It’s early, sure, but through training camp and into the first two games of the pre-season, Virtanen looks ready to shove his way onto the Canucks roster. He kept fans updated on social media during the summer that he spent the off-season focussed on eating right and working out in preparation for 2017-18. Virtanen showed up 16 pounds lighter than last year and talked about wanting to be a game changer for the Canucks.

    In the Canucks two pre-season games thus far, Virtanen has definitely been noticeable. In the first game against the Kings on Saturday, he led the team with five hits and scored a goal in the second period as the Canucks won 4-3 in overtime. His solid play was rewarded by Green as Virtanen was tapped to start overtime on Horvat’s wing.

    Sunday’s 9-4 loss to the Golden Knights was no masterpiece by any stretch of the imagination, but Virtanen managed to make his mark once again. He had a role in two of the Canucks four goals, creating havoc in front of the Golden Knights net on Boeser’s second marker of the game and screened VGK goalie Dylan Ferguson on Philip Holm’s goal. Virtanen had an assist, his four shots was second only to Boeser and his two takeaways tied with Anton Rodin for the most on the team.

    My colleague Trevor Beggs has Virtanen as a candidate for the Canucks fourth line. It’s possible, and if his play continues like it has so far this preseason, he may force the Canucks into making room for him higher in the lineup.

    Boeser has shown that he’s the top of the Canucks prospect’s crop, but Virtanen is definitely knocking on the door. If they both push out some veteran players and are on the roster opening night, it’s proof the Canucks rebuild is on course – and the fan base will take a sigh of relief.

    https://thehockeywriters.com/vancouver-canucks-jake-virtanen-roster/
     

    • Upvote 3
  2. 18 minutes ago, alfstonker said:

    Thats strange given what they say in above tweets about "finding each other" on the ice.

     

    I'm not sure I understand what you're getting at.

    Edit: I think it might be a misunderstanding. I meant that Dahlen and Gadjovich might not be a good paring of wingers for Pettersson. I didn't meant that Dahlen wouldn't be a good winger with Pettersson (I think it's already established that he is), but since both him and Gadjovich are left wingers, it's unlikely that they'll both play wing with Pettersson at the same time.

  3. 10 minutes ago, Hutton Wink said:

    I understand that, and it wasn't the point.  It was a straight-up asset-to-asset comparison.  The rest is speculation.

    I guess. I suppose I would argue that Burrows, in your comparison, is speculation considering that the right side is after the TDL so the left side should be as well. It just seems misleading to me to compare assets when you can't determine the value due to one of them being a variable, and comparing them at different points in time can lead to big misconceptions.

    Even as a straight up asset-to-asset comparison, I think it's an unfair picture to paint as it isn't an accurate representation of value (good or bad).

    I'm not trying to call you out but rather suggest that people should base their opinions of the Gudbranson trade on that comparison. If you weren't trying to use it as an argument for it, then I apologize. That's just how it came across to me.

  4. 1 minute ago, Hutton Wink said:

    We'd either have Burrows (re-signed), whatever he got us at the TDL, or he'd be gone as a UFA.

    My point is that if he gets us someone else of Dahlens quality at the TDL, that lineup on the left looks a lot better, so it's hard to judge the difference when we can't see the result. With that in mind, if Burrows doesn't get traded and walks in free agency, it looks a lot worse.

    I like Gudbranson and still make the trade, I just don't thing that a fair comparison can be made on that, even if we select Dahlen at 33

  5. 1 minute ago, Hutton Wink said:

     

    Perhaps Dahlen (42) is who they would have taken with the pick (33) traded to Florida in the Gudbranson deal.

     

    McCann + Dahlen + Burrows or Gudbranson + Dahlen

    This suggests that we wouldn't have gotten anything for Burrows at the TDL. It's possible Ottawa trades us another piece, but I wouldn't begin to speculate what.

    I'm happy with where we are, but that's not the full picture.

    • Upvote 1
  6. 13 minutes ago, J.R. said:

    Dahlen will already be on a pro contract if he plays here or the AHL. Games played doesn't matter. If he goes to the SHL, I believe his contract slides (though someone ccan correct me if I'm wrong there).

     

    the 9 game/ELC rule only applies for players who otherwise would be going back to junior hockey.

    Gotcha. Thanks, I always have trouble with the finer points of these rules.

  7. Just now, J.R. said:

    9 and that only applies to junior players.

    The 10th game activates the ELC right? I'm not very clear on this rule, are ELC's automatically activated for players overseas?

  8. 2 minutes ago, 73 Percent said:

    I say shl but I'd like to see him with Utica.

    I think both are excellent options. On one hand, the SHL is a highly skilled mens league where he could get a chance to play with and develop further chemistry with his potential future center in Pettersson. On the other hand, he could start to learn the Canucks system in the AHL, acclimatize to the smaller ice and develop chemistry with the other Canuck prospects. I'd be happy either way. 

  9. 2 hours ago, alfstonker said:

    Man, I just hope if these two are to carry our first line hopes we get a good 3rd man capable of destroying anyone who takes liberties.

    We don't want history repeating itself. We have had nearly 15 years of being fore-warned and to ignore the past mistakes and worse still repeat them is incompetent.

     

    Maybe Jonah Gadjovich is up to the task, who knows, but we better have someone lined up and soon.

    I think Jonah could very well be the guy. He played along side a similar, high skilled centeman in Nick Suzuki and thrived there. He also seems super motivated, with an excellent work ethic. Obviously, there are a ton of variables that could derail this, but there is reason to believe that he could rise to the occasion.

    Edit: Just had a look and realized that both Dahlen and Gadjovich are LW's, so it may not be an ideal pairing. That is unless one of them is fine playing off wing. I know some players can do it without missing a beat but I don't know enough about these guys to know if they're capable.

  10. 8 minutes ago, R3aL said:

    Wow had no idea he packed on some serious weight..

     

    Hopefully its mostly LBM.

     

    That plus Salo being there to coach and evaluate he could actually potentially make the team.. I scoffed at it this morning when I heard on radio but now with this info maybe he can.

    I seem to remember him saying that he was training with Salo earlier this offseason as well. If I'm remembering correctly, that can only mean good things. Nothing wrong with some advice from a quality long term NHL'er and fellow countryman.

  11. 8 minutes ago, Fanuck said:

    Entitlement vs humbleness,  is there a clearer example?  Let's hope it's just youthful exuberance overwhelming Goldy for now as entitlement is literally rampant in all the kids

    I personally know and interact with these days.

    Are players invited to prospect camp after a full year in the AHL (pro)? I can't remember if the likes of Gaunce, Subban, Cassels and others went after theirs.

  12. On 6/30/2017 at 2:36 PM, Hutton Wink said:

     

    So Boeser at age 20 wants to be a leader for the younger guys, while Goldobin at 21 wants to buy another new car.

     

    ...but Goldobin knows more about what it takes to be a professional.

    I haven't seen him in any of the group pictures from the weekend. I wonder if he's shied away from them or if he didn't take part in that bit of prospect camp and is only around for the on ice stuff.

  13. 1 hour ago, Camel Toe Drag said:

    Excited for GB to be THE MAN down in Utica this year. I think he's going to surprise a lot of people this year and become one of our best prospects. 

    I think the added structure of a professional league might really help him thrive. A pairing of him and Subban could be fun.

    • Upvote 3
  14. 1 minute ago, J.R. said:

    Harrumph.. man we seem to have trouble actually getting talent to Utica. They either head straight to the NHL or are in Europe, college etc.

    I was excited to see him in the A this year. It looks like we`ll have a small window at the end of his KHL contract to negotiate with him before he becomes a UFA. If he continues to develop, I hope we don`t lose him entirely. Definitely not an enviable position for the Canucks though.

×
×
  • Create New...