Scorvat Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 With the rumours picking up for a Lack to buffalo deal picking up. Here is my proposal.TO VAN Kane 2ndTO BUF Hamhuis Higgins Lack Vey/Gaunce/Grenier/other B+ prospectWHY BUFFALO DOES THIS Buffalo has a great young core. They need veteran leadership. With this trade they get 2 veteran players who have made it to the SCF and has a lot of playoff experience. One of whom is an olympic Dman in Hamhuis. Another being Higgins who is a very good 2 way forward who is great on the PK. Plus they get a prospect to develope and/or Vey. And a "potential" star goalie in Lack. Not bad for a player thats never played a game for them. Plus a pick. Plus Kane is rumoured to go to the Canucks when he is a UFA [sPECULATION] so maybe Buffalo would see this as getting atleast something for him.WHY VANCOUVER DOES THIS we make this move to free cap space (Hamhuis, Higgins), and roster spots for youth. If Vey is moved, thatd be 2 spots for a prospect to come in with kane being the one taking Higgins spot. We also move Lack and have the goalie situation taking care of. Then we can look at moving Bieksa at the draft for a 2nd/3rd and bring in a UFA such as Franson/Ehroff on a 1/2 year deal. Not looking too far ahead in this proposal. I think we could work something out here. What does CDC think? OrTO VAN Kane 2ndTO BUF Lack Higgins Hamhuis Kassian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.