RBork77 Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I was checking WHL scores to see how Connauton was doing tonight and seen Beach had 2 goals tonight. Just looked at his stats because it seemed like there was a good chance the Canucks were gonna end up with Beach pre-draft. So if ya wanna think I was insinuating something, you go right ahead,,,,lol Look dude, Beach is an idiot. He could get 150 points in the WHL this season and I'd still be happy we didn't take the cancerous little punk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hafizzle Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Look dude, Beach is an idiot. He could get 150 points in the WHL this season and I'd still be happy we didn't take the cancerous little punk. Agreed 100% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Schroeder's amping it up! Wizard Time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Schroeder getting assists is good enough for Lucia Gophers coach Don Lucia said he is not worried that sophomore center Jordan Schroeder has not scored a goal yet this season. Schroeder was picked by the WCHA coaches and media to be the conference's Player of the Year or, in one poll, the co-Player of the Year with St. Cloud State forward Ryan Lasch. "I am not worried about that [goals] as long as he is picking up points," Lucia said. "The [Alaska Anchorage] goalie made a great save on the one. That line is starting to get some chances and scored two goals. That's the important thing for me.: Mike Hoeffel and Jay Barriball, Schroeder's linemates, each had one goal. Schroeder had two assists Sunday for the second day in a row as the Gophers won 4-1 over the Seawolves. "Jordan is a great assist guy, too, and those guys have to finish those plays when he sets them up," Lucia said. Schroeder had only 13 goals last season but 32 assists for 45 points. This past weekend he had six shots on goal against the Seawolves in the two games and was a plus-four http://www.startribune.com/blogs/68571262....iD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirensong87 Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 6GP 0G 4A Looking much better after going pointless in his 1st 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avelanch Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 6GP 0G 4A Looking much better after going pointless in his 1st 4. along with the rest of his team. there was only 1 game in the first 4 which anyone on his team got any points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clutesi Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Agreed 100% Yup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorious Secret Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Look dude, Beach is an idiot. He could get 150 points in the WHL this season and I'd still be happy we didn't take the cancerous little punk. Beach is exactly the type of player Gillis won't/wouldn't pick and frankly I'd be quite pissed if he did. I think if Hodgson wasn't available at #10, Gillis would have gone for either Myers, Teubert or even Boychuk which would all be great choices instead of Beach. That kid is a punk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGrabner40 Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Beach is exactly the type of player Gillis won't/wouldn't pick and frankly I'd be quite pissed if he did. I think if Hodgson wasn't available at #10, Gillis would have gone for either Myers, Teubert or even Boychuk which would all be great choices instead of Beach. That kid is a punk Which is why Chicago drafted the cancer known as Kyle Beach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBork77 Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 That kid is a punk Which is why Chicago drafted the cancer known as Kyle Beach. let me get this straight...Chicago drafted Beach because Gillis wouldn't? hhmmm, I don't get it. Are you saying Dale Tallon is a better GM than Gillis? knows more about prospects than the Canucks? are dumb for drafting the cancerous retard? That Blackhawks don't mind drafting donkeys...and the Canucks are committed to a higher standard? Tell me more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneypuckOverlord Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 QUOTE (RBork77 @ Nov 2 2009, 01:47 AM) Look dude, Beach is an idiot. He could get 150 points in the WHL this season and I'd still be happy we didn't take the cancerous little punk. Beach is exactly the type of player Gillis won't/wouldn't pick and frankly I'd be quite pissed if he did. I think if Hodgson wasn't available at #10, Gillis would have gone for either Myers, Teubert or even Boychuk which would all be great choices instead of Beach. That kid is a punk As I recall, Gillis had Beach on his shortlist, along with Tyler Myers and Zach Boychuck , that we would have drafted with our 10th pick. Also Brian Burke wanted to draft him with the 12th pick, but because he was drafted 11th, Burke traded that pick. Beach might have some issues, but he is a good player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBork77 Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 As I recall, Gillis had Beach on his shortlist, along with Tyler Myers and Zach Boychuck , that we would have drafted with our 10th pick. Also Brian Burke wanted to draft him with the 12th pick, but because he was drafted 11th, Burke traded that pick. Beach might have some issues, but he is a good player. One can't deny that he's got he tools, but his skills aren't good enough to make up for his character flaws, imo. I watched him play in Everett for 2 1/2 years and he was entertaining, but I always thought he was an idiot, kind of the way I felt about Jarko Ruutu and Matt Cooke when they were Canucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballsdeepfreeze Posted November 7, 2009 Share Posted November 7, 2009 1 Assist for Schroeder tonight in another losing cause for the Gophers.... 1 Goal for our former glory boy White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b3. Posted November 7, 2009 Share Posted November 7, 2009 That bum Patrick White, better not start to "play" now. ## FACEOFFS GP W L Pct 2 Kevin Wehrs 5 1 0 1.000 26 Jay Barriball 5 1 0 1.000 24 Zach Budish 6 7 4 .636 16 Mike Carman 6 45 38 .542 13 Nico Sacchetti 5 28 24 .538 9 Taylor Matson 6 20 19 .513 19 Jordan Schroeder 6 60 60 .500 11 Mike Hoeffel 6 1 1 .500 7 Patrick White 6 17 19 .472 12 Tony Lucia 6 4 6 .400 18 Nick Larson 2 4 10 .286 22 Ryan Flynn 6 0 2 .000 [/code] [code] Shots Penalties Goals ## Name GP G A Pts Shots Pct +/- No-Min Min Maj Oth PP SH FG GW Gtg OT HT PN UA 12 Tony Lucia 6 3 2 5 12 .250 +3 4-8 4 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 Mike Hoeffel 6 3 1 4 17 .176 +3 1-2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 Jay Barriball 5 2 2 4 8 .250 +3 5-10 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 Jordan Schroeder 6 0 4 4 13 .000 +2 4-8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Patrick White 6 1 2 3 11 .091 0 0-0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Taylor Matson 6 0 3 3 4 .000 +3 1-2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Kevin Wehrs 5 1 1 2 8 .125 +1 3-6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Zach Budish 6 1 0 1 8 .125 0 3-6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Aaron Ness 6 1 0 1 9 .111 -2 3-6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Cade Fairchild 6 0 1 1 16 .000 +1 6-12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 David Fischer 6 0 1 1 7 .000 +1 4-8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Ryan Flynn 6 0 1 1 5 .000 -1 6-12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Josh Birkholz 5 0 0 0 6 .000 0 1-2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Mike Carman 6 0 0 0 12 .000 -1 4-11 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Jake Hansen 5 0 0 0 5 .000 -1 4-8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Seth Helgeson 6 0 0 0 2 .000 +4 5-10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Nick Larson 2 0 0 0 0 .000 0 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Nick Leddy 5 0 0 0 6 .000 0 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Sam Lofquist 2 0 0 0 4 .000 -1 2-4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Joe Miller 2 0 0 0 5 .000 0 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Nico Sacchetti 5 0 0 0 8 .000 -3 2-4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TM TEAM 4 0 0 0 0 .000 0 1-2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total............... 6 12 18 30 166 .072 +12 59-121 58 1 0 1 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 Opponents........... 6 15 28 43 192 .078 - 59-145 55 1 3 7 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy_the_scot Posted November 7, 2009 Share Posted November 7, 2009 I was saying last year that it was still too early to give up on White. I saw him as a potential 3rd line centre or, if he was very lucky and determined, a second line player. He was playing with plugs last year, and I think he may have moved up on the depth chart. That said, I would still take Ehrhoff over him in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avelanch Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 Patrick White just made it 3-0 with a wide open goal. I didn't hear who scored/assisted on the other goals since i just tuned in. gophers on the PP now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnickers87 Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 Patrick White just made it 3-0 with a wide open goal. I didn't hear who scored/assisted on the other goals since i just tuned in. gophers on the PP now He has a goal and an assist, giving him 3G/3A in 7.67 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 Crazy Pat White. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronyaur Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 Crazy Pat White. Honestly, I wish him well. Best of luck, Pat. But, yes, I'd take Ehrhoff over him in a second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanford Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 Wow honestly guys.. who cares if Pat White is getting points.. In the end we got Erhoff, who's been our best defencemen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.