Wetcoaster Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 What reason is there to think 5,000 was not coercive enough? Her bail increased as a direct result of her behavior - it was a punishment, and in direct circumvention of the spirit of the money bond. Zimmerman was a son of a judge and 150,000 -> 1,000,000 is a substantial increase. 5,000 -> 10,000 is not, and it is disingenuous to state otherwise. It is clear 5,000 is a substantial amount for her to appear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Ambien Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 How many times did he ask her how much her jewelry was worth? What answer did he finally get? Respectful indeed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Obviously that was a bad/dumb answer, one does not need focus on that because everyone knows it. Really? You didn't see the way the judge first dismissed her while she waited? You didn't see and hear the judge mock her "adios" after doubling her bail, then dismissing her again in the douche-like fashion he did the first time? You are in need of some special glasses and/or a hearing aid, then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimpcurtly Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Obviously that was a bad/dumb answer, one does not need focus on that because everyone knows it and it's not in dispute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Obviously that was a bad/dumb answer, one does not need focus on that because everyone knows it and it's not in dispute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Hartnell's Mane Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 comment withdrawn upon second examination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 nvm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Ambien Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 You don't think that was the genesis for the predicament she is in now?!?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Hartnell's Mane Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 As WC has esplained several times, the judge wanted to know the value of her jewelry as an asset in assessing the amount of her bail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimpcurtly Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 The way I see this is the judge made an example of her. How is the worth of her jewelry in any way relevant to the prescription drug charge she was originally brought in for? Judge was being just as much a smart ass as she was and because he's the one with the power, she's the one getting nailed for it. That's it in a nutshell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Right on. Comment withdrawn. lol. I'm getting off of here to study my Eights. Catch you on the flip side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimpcurtly Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 If criminal contempt was saying "Rick Ross" (obviously she had no tangible number) then he should have done it then and there, instead he antagonised and mocked her. This is not proper behaviour of a judge that wants the judicial system to be taken seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Ambien Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 If I'm ever being a smartass to a judge...I'm going to expect to get it right back. She played with fire, she got burned....it in a nutshell as far as I see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 nvm ~ just too frickin' easy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 If criminal contempt was saying "Rick Ross" (obviously she had no tangible number) then he should have done it then and there, instead he antagonised and mocked her. This is not proper behaviour of a judge that wants the judicial system to be taken seriously. I've seen better attempts at playing dumb than this. 0/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 The only playing dumb I see is emanating from you. She was warned clearly this was a serious matter and that she should treat it as such and chose to ignore that warning. The criminal contempt was raising her middle finger and swearing at the judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Ambien Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 The only playing dumb I see is emanating from you. She was warned clearly this was a serious matter and that she should treat it as such and chose to ignore that warning. The criminal contempt was raising her middle finger and swearing at the judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimpcurtly Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 The only playing dumb I see is emanating from you. She was warned clearly this was a serious matter and that she should treat it as such and chose to ignore that warning. The criminal contempt was raising her middle finger and swearing at the judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuckin_futz Posted February 7, 2013 Author Share Posted February 7, 2013 The judge gave her plenty of leeway. Her contempt of court started long before she ever opened her mouth. Look at the video, she had the audacity to show up in his court (on a possession charge of all things) high as a kite. You may argue this all you want but she is high. He is a judge, it is his job to judge her. That's what he did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 The judge gave her plenty of leeway. Her contempt of court started long before she ever opened her mouth. Look at the video, she had the audacity to show up in his court (on a possession charge of all things) high as a kite. You may argue this all you want but she is high. He is a judge, it is his job to judge her. That's what he did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.