NucksCup2015

you're 16 and play floor hockey and think you 'get it' lol end of even reading your sillyness...

yes and what happens if lou doesn't absolutely rob kane on a two on one when he had time and roofs it? oh ya

Do you not get that letting in two goals a game should mean you win more than you lose? If you don't get I dont know what to say. If you are letting in 2 goals and losing more than you are winning based, then logic says its not goaltending buddy stop trolling everyone is tired of your nonsense. all for placing blame where it deserved, operative word, deserved.

LOL! that's hilarious! As for Kass, he answered professionally after the game and simply said "I know why I was benched and i need to be better and find a way to contribute"

shouldn't the sedin's, burr, kes, hansen, garrison edler, find a way to focus and score? you clearly have never played the game man.. its fine, being a sofa superstar you have a right to blame...when you've played the game you get its a team effort and scoring one goal a game doesn't allow you to win very often

when your goalie lets in 2 goals a game, you should be winning alot more than losing its that simple. and lou has done that but we're losing so the problem is offense buddy. learn to play the game and you might get it.

your commentary 'implies' that the reason we lost this game, along with many other recently is because of Luongo. which is NOT the case. this is why others are upset much as during the cup run, you are blaming Lou for no being perfect, yet ignoring the terrible offensive out put of the rest of the team. In the cup run, Lou got blamed particularly for the loss vs boston, yet this team during that series scored 8 goals in seven games. effectively in order to win the stanley cup, lou would have had to allow 1 or less per game. yet no one argued the sedin's didn't show up, kesler didn't show up, burr etc. I was at 3 games during that series had we found a way to score, Lou would have won the conn smythe In a similar vein you are now blaming him for losing this game (yet he kept them in it). you give him no credit for some of the big saves he made earlier in the game (ie off Kane on the 2 on 1) to hold his team in. Yes that was a bad goal. was it the reason we lost NO... the reason we are losing has zero to do with our goaltending, it has to do with our lack of scoring. your constant harping on lou shows a incredible lack of hockey knowledge and displays you as a whiny little kid who wants to troll...sorry thats fact.

luongo doesn't score goals end of discussion

MG needs to realize one thing. Being a one line team is very easy to stop. He may believe that the Sedins and Kes can carry this team, and his money ball picks (who are playing well granted) can provide "team" secondary scoring. This idea is simplistic and a failure on his part. If you have a one line team, teams can play their best players against them constantly, they will tire them out and when you're not overly worried about the rest of the team because they are 3rd and 4th liners they become very easy to beat. We cannot win with simply one line. AV never put Kes with the Sedins for that reason. Now because Torts has changed that, its become a glaring issue. Having Kes on the second line without a trade appears to be a necessity. He will need a playmaker and will need to be a threat so that teams have a tough time deciding who to focus on. We have no offensive scoring depth that is MG's fault, but Torts needs to recognize that he's playing into the opponents hand by not having Kes on the 2nd.

reminds me of how they played in the boston series man...bad memories

not only is lu being blamed for goals against now he's being blamed for goals for? lol...wow that's impressive....Lou is the reason the canucks can't SCORE goals now folks! haahhahaha

I agree...he's also got to learn to start imposing his size on other teams..he's big but you seldom see him really using his size to get to the net etc. Part of that is puck confidence though...

All those highlights of our chances they showed. Most were one and out, not second/third And only one guy near the net...which explains why no second/third chances. There's your goal scoring problem Torts

Man Burr is just snakebitten....guy can't catch a break

if we fall 12-14 back before the mid point market, with how tight this conference is, we can start thinking about who goes before the deadline ...because we won't be making the playoffs...and thats not far off..

Here is the problem We just had some space, Wiese had the puck on the left wing. He comes down the ice and stops above the circle at the half boards He is not Henrik Sedin. He needs to take that puck hard to the net with his speed, create a shot and a rebound some mess and hopefully second/third chances Instead he thinks he's gretz and gets pasted and we turn it over.. Unbelievable

wow man....the guy has been the most consistent canuck reg season and playoffs for 8 years and he comes back from an injury and you're whining? not mention incredibly underpaid for 5 of those years... wow ..troll a little?

man crawford is winning this game for chicago and lou let in a softie...hate to say it but it is the difference right now

with burrows still in his slump this team is really hurting usually he was one of the most consistent players so if the sedin or kes was off he would pick up the slack. without another top six guy it hurt but at least burr's play was there. with him mired in this slump and without another top six guy we're really feeling it.. damn

should have kept shinkaruk with the big team, a player like that with creativity could really be helping this group... they are a mess....too predictable..every team knows how to stop them

1 goal again but MG doesn't think we need a top 6 player lol