-
Posts
7,653 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Everything posted by lmm
-
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 20, 6 p.m. | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
6 pm -
this is great is it possible to leave the old numbersup while adding the new ones? That way we can track our advancements or falls from contention just an Idae
-
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
that guy is awesome -
I wouldn't worry too much about the old Gaudner He started fast in Vancouver last year when nobody knew who he was, then dried up when he started to garner attention He'll get a few points in Chi-town but nothing to get upset about Probably ends up getting traded for Vinnie Hinastrozza at some point
-
Edler To Have Hearing Today [Update: Suspended 2 games]
lmm replied to -DLC-'s topic in Canucks Talk
omg whi is doing that call? "Ohhh it big pain for number 12, its Eric Staal I believe, he's holding his right kneeeeee" that guy should have a ob in the NHL -
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
would you say the same if it was JT Miller going down? -
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
I guess I just enjoy other broadcasters I like Cassie and Botterill I like most other teams broadcasters I like John and John too I just don't watch these types of games looking for minor infractions by the broadcast teams I would happpily trade our guys for Hughison , Simpson , Campbell and Principe if it meant never having to hear Ron McLean's voice again though I think when I hear things like the stick lift, usually the comment is meant to cover for poor reffing, that I notice -
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
I thought it was a good call but after a 3 minute shift and under the circumstances I think I'd chalk that one up to a brain fart -
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
wait a minute where are you getting your stats tonight? Didn't Trevor Linden score his first 184 goals from Right Wing? -
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
I noticed the "Stick Lift" also, but otherwise I thought it was a pretty evenly called game I have heard John Garrett say things equally as head scratching/League defending -
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
thats a reaching stat do you have a list of most minutes played by a right shot defenseman in a home win against the Leafs after a 3 week break because of a major illness? I'ma go out on a limb and say Ty My is tops followed by Hamonic then Chatterbox -
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
the only thing worse than watching the Canucks lose is listening to Canuck fans whine about broadcasters even when we win -
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
i hope you got it taped long enough to get to overtime -
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
there was the absense of the front line worker introduction for the pregame siren Green was coaching like he did in the first 2 rounds of the playoffs -
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
well that was fun high points for me The No goal with 20 seconds left Ron SHifting blame away from the referee (seriously didn't he get fired 6 years ago?) Mathews "Lifting the stick" wha tthe stick didn't lift and he contacted the hands, I didn't see that Oh ya and Bo Chatfield and Holy the Goaly -
I saw him live in Cloverdale
-
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
I thought maybe it is Last Names Jersey retirement and all the players are wearing Last Name for the warm up maybe they will sell off the jerseys later -
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
I actually expect teh Canucks to be in the game til about mid game then it will get away on them 7-2 leafs -
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
two hours till game time and still no line up? -
I have never been a fan of players that "Dropped" how many have performed above their draft possition to make the "Passing " teams sad? I think a player drops because the GMs see something they don't like or just don't trust In Schroeder's class, it was not a great year but 9 or the next 40 selected have played at least 500 games
-
sometimes it is however if you recall Gaunce was a point a game player in junior in his draft year and the 3 following years. he was over a point a game in the playoffs but when he got to Utica he was moved from scoring center to 4th line wing he never scored at a point a game pace until his last 4 games in the NHL And he lost his last chance with the Canucks to the golden boy Adam Gaudette given every chance to succeed
-
well maybe that has something to do with developement Jake falls into that catagory as well jury is still out on Woo. Lind. Gadj, Mikey, Rath, Lockwood and Brisbois Also Shinkaruck and Gaunce were developed by the Jim team so its either drafting (Gillis) or Developement (Jim) on a side note, McCann's numbers are almost identical to Cody Hodgson's
-
[GDT/PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs Toronto Maple Leaves | April 18 | SNP
lmm replied to -SN-'s topic in Canucks Talk
I am assuming they mean "At all, this seson" but it sounds bad hopefully its not like Boeser who played 2 years with a bad wrist I also hope they don't mean at all, at all