Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

86Viking

Members
  • Posts

    10,672
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 86Viking

  1. why are people even talking about this made up story. If the poster doesnt upload an immediate photo, or video and its not on the internet when you search it. Drop it, This is for hockey discussions not for some person to get a luagh out of ppl who bring it up. Its been noted Kesler hurt some part on his hand during the Russian game in Sochi
  2. Does kesler have an issue with AV, or is that a rumour? Thought he played for him with the moose aswell. Stepan,miller and mcilrath for Kesler?
  3. 5 days of jet legged seems like a bit much. Other teams players ahve played a couple games already. Lack played great, but arent you suppose to role with the #1 on the last 21 game push for the playoffs, regardless of what the backup does?
  4. oh yes trading them seperately is the right move. Gillis could do both now or at the draft. If he does and he gets a solid return, I would definitely have to give him credit and take back firing him. But if he stays the course and doesnt move these assets while they have their best value, we could go down the road of having to do a full rebuild and take less back and hope draft picks turn out. where i would prefer moving them now and getting back players that can play now. kesler is our version now of Linden. No one wanted him gone, but look at the return we got and how it helped us down the road greatly. This is why i would be ok trading Kesler, if we netted a good package
  5. yes and no, they are signed longterm at a good cap hit. Both players were good, now they are still valuable but not the same player. I think it would be hard to get both from philly in a deal. Lets make it Holmgren-esque Kesler, Edler for Schenns, Simmonds pick/hagg/prospect
  6. if we could get that i would be happy. id even add something to make it happen, nothing huge though. Thats 1 top 6 forward who is almost 30 for 2 young guys who are both top 6 guys now. Thats the kind of value we need back, not brandon sutter. Pouliot would be nice, but not as a main piece for kesler. edler is a different story
  7. we dont want an older brittle player signed for a long time in Franzen. we move kesler for a guy younger than him who can play now
  8. both players edler and kesler. If and when either or both get moved. We need to address our top 6. Maybe a D prospect in one of the deals. but gettting 2 forwards who can play now would be a higher priority imo
  9. both of you have your opinion, im no mod, but i would think if this conversation doesnt go to private messages one or both could be suspended from the forum. just want to talk hockey, time for ppl to let it go or continue it in another way. Warhippy: i can see why you took your stance, but no point going on as it seems like you wont get anywhere by doing so. Just how some people are, cant do anything about it. still dont see us at all interested in a sutter trade. maybe jokinen,bennett and pouliot. jokinen is a decent player, wanted us to get him for a measely pick last deadline
  10. you just dont want to let this go eh. theres a time to let things go obviously you would rather continue this. Maybe i over reacted, but in the same way it can be offensive to ppl who know someone who has had that happen to someone they know. but hey keep on saying things about me, cuz you know me so well...
  11. we need quality coming back, i dont want quantity or picks we have to wait for to make an impact. Rattie may be ready next year, schwartz is now. If the blues want a Cup, they wouldnt hesitate to make a deal like this. Kesler gives them a great 1-2 punch down the middle. Probably one of the hardest tandems down the middle for teams to face. Both are physical and like to hit. Stewart is for cap reasons, maybe it could be berglund instead? THink berglund halak/elliot and maybe a pick could get them Miller. Adding Miller and Kesler would really improve their team.
  12. neither the GM nor Player has yet to come out and deny the rumour. Would think if it was false one of them would have denied it last night, maybe this morning?\ If the blues want kesler they need to move schwartz to get us interested Schwartz,Stewart,Rattie Still leaves the blues with Backes Kesler Roy Berglund Lappy Sobotka still lots of C depth their. Berglund is a great 3rd line center, they are using him on the wing now. Shinkaruk Schwartz Kassian Jensen Horvat Rattie Decent future top 6 Couturier and simmonds, or B.schenn plus (hagg, mcginn) Jenner plus (rychel, anisimov, 1st rounder) Nyquist plus(jurco,sproul,pulkinnen) Strome plus(martin,pulock) Stepan plus(mcilrath) jt miller? Turris plus(wiercoch,stone) Kucherov plus(connolly,panik,palat,purcell) The ''PLus'' would vary with the above players. I wouldnt mind seeing Stepan coming here, good history with torts. Not sure what else we could get. We wont trade kesler in our division, we didnt move schneids, cant see us help anaheim. lots of options, with decent returns possible, problem is have we scouted enough to make a big trade like this and known what we would potentially be getting in return? Could be better to wait till the draft? But if these rumours dont get squashed, its going to be a big distraction to the team, media will be all over it, we just went through it with the goalies dont want this happening again
  13. columbus wont move johansen, jenner maybe. johansen has been on fire leading up to the olympic break. maybe last summer we could have got him before his breakout.
  14. sounds right, he can play as he did play 4 games at the olympics. If he would just squash the rumours right away this would quiet down, the more time goes without kesler releasing a statement the more it becomes more of a possibility
  15. if its fake, kesler could grab his phone and squash all this by tweeting, i did not request a trade. seems simple enough to do
  16. ok then, guess when someone you know gets raped just say well all that really happened is... and see how ppl would react to you saying that
  17. Really, when you hear that word, almost everyone in the world thinks of one thing thats it. who gives a frack what numerouss dictionary terminologies say
  18. rumours posted on hf. Im sure there are 10 teams or so interested in either of them. Now its the GM's role to milk and get that extra good piece out of a team.
  19. yes definitely an ability to tweak the deal. Think a deal could be made, let them keep couturier, have some interest in hagg or mcginn. Laughton similar to Horvat? Apparently 2 metropolitan teams are interested. gotta believe Holmgren is in on the action, he always is
  20. kesler,edler to phi for b.schenn,l.schenn simmonds Kesler= schenns: I think Luke Schenn would do well under torts. Edler= Simmonds
  21. i think if anything edler may get moved by deadline. i would say 30% chance. Doubt Kesler gets moved, earliest i could see that is at the draft. Hansen is a player that would be sought after by teams, could package him with either of the above to get a solid return. I hope MG tries to make a move, but i sure as hell hope he doesnt move either for scraps.
  22. some twiiter by harrison mooney, says something like a deal was almost done for kesler for despres and sutter. If that is remotely accurate. We should Fire Gillis now. That is a horrible return. Not sure if there was a cap dump aswell, dont use twitter, posted on hf though aswell
  23. i agree, but we need to make some kind of move. but it does contradict this http://forum.canucks.com/topic/357291-proposal-edler-to-ottawa/ Would you rather move bieksa?
×
×
  • Create New...