SamJamIam

I've actually liked us in the offensive zone. Looks like we've learned some lessons. D coverage is what's the issue at the moment. And don't forget that 3 shots bounced right to Florida sticks before they scored. Lu can only do so much.

Except it would be tied if not for that no goal. But I do think our team has a weird inability/aversion to one-time the puck

To be fair Plum, a few guys just seem a whole hell of a lot more interested in when I say it than when 20 people echo the sentiment. As if complaining about complaining is somehow better.

Blocked

Then mods can kindly get this kid off my ass. Every ???? thread I get this craphead singling me out for saying what tons of people echo. Oh wait! There's a block list. Lovely.

Attack then call retaliation an attack. What a child.

Stars have chopped sticks out of Canuck hands 8 times so far while right on the play. No bias though guys.

Have no illusions bud. I post with the intention of simply voicing my opinion. You post to go after people for not having the same opinion as you. Who's the douchebag here?

Oh sod off. You bitch constantly about people bitching. You're no better, just more righteously indignant. No one's fooled. No one's impressed.

No holding the stick there? Really?

Conspiracies are unlikely because they require ridiculous levels of collusion. What the NHL is being accused of isn't a conspiracy. It's just a few refs and a couple league executives. Not that hard, especially when those same organizations came up with "parity" as a euphemism for twisting the game into a more profitable form at the cost of quality competition.

Naw, it's like when you look at a car's wheels while its speeding up and it looks like they're going backwards....

Not when they control what counts as a goal haha.

So they can dictate games, ensure parity and not be held accountable of course. Why else?

Don't complain about the refs. People you've scorned for doing the same might just get the idea that you're a bit of a hypocrite about these things.

Well I'm being honest when I say that you have little to no hockey knowledge, a big mouth and are likely a troll.

Well..... 2 of them are fine.

LG has alluded to that potential in a couple of interviews

It won't let me change my name back until frickin Christmas. I would if I could.

My name is a joke because I had a source that was wrong at trade deadline. samjam99 is a different guy.

Dude, stop assuming. You talk like Horvat playing on the Canucks would be an all or nothing affair. He's not our only prospect and we only have so many roster spots. I expect Horvat will get a couple of games after his season with the Knights. Other prospects will do the same and we'll have something of a revolving door. Not quite. I thought he'd be stuck under Christian Thomas again and didn't realize Thomas was born in 92 not 93.

Have an early Christmas gift

Amusing lecture when it never occurred to you that Horvat could play a few games at the tail end of the season after the OHL playoffs. Or that Jensen would still feel the effects of a lockout shoving everyone down a league with Juniors being flooded just like the AHL and ECHL. Yup, your frantic leaping to conclusions when there is a perfectly reasonable answer is sure making me look bad. Not bright kid. Just like your Horvat predictions.

Forget quoting you on it, I want to see you make a youtube video saying you're a retard and know nothing about junior hockey if you're wrong. Up the stakes and we'll see if you stand behind an assertion as dumb as that one. World Juniors, another go of the Memorial Cup on a dominant team, a chance to prove he has more offense than he's been given credit for and possibly as the captain of the Knights. It's never happening that he makes our roster. He might get a few call ups to supplement all that Junior success and give him new goals. Jensen's choice to go oversees was to do with not getting buried on a roster because of how many NHLers were stuck in the AHL.