Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

The Official Transit Thread


nitronuts

Recommended Posts

Another idiotic plan by the liberals; Why didn't the money stay in BC? I bet the Canada line will be the same situation; Revenue goes overseas while Translink is left with the expenses. Then we wonder why Translink is in the hole so much every year.

Well actually, InTransitBC (Canada Line) is entirely Canadian...being a joint venture between SNC Lavalin (Quebec), Caisse de Depot et Placements de Quebec, and the Investment Management Corporation of BC.

As for the Golden Ears, the cost was split between the private sector and Translink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Golden Ears Bridge records a busy first week

By Rebecca teBrake, Vancouver Sun

June 24, 2009

METRO VANCOUVER -- The debut week of the Golden Ears Bridge saw it carrying 17,000 more vehicles per day than projected, but more traffic won’t mean lower tolls.

The bridge’s electronic tolling system shows 329,000 vehicles, an average of 47,000 per day, crossed over June 16-22. TransLink had projected the number of daily crossings at 30,000.

“All we know for sure is, forecasts are wrong,” said Fred Cummings, TransLink vice-president of major projects.

“I think we had a lot of people coming out to drive the bridge to say that they drove the bridge in the first week of operation, but also to see what difference it does make in their travel time.”

Crossing the bridge is a free until July 16, when tolls kick in. Cummings said the tolls will likely mean the end of the higher-than-expected numbers.

“It’s a good news story for us on the revenue side if traffic numbers stay as high as they do, but typically when you add a toll to a bridge, the numbers go down,” Cummings said.

Still, TransLink has already leased 10,000 transponders — electronic devices that identify the vehicle’s owner. It had expected to lease only 5,000 by now.

More than 11,000 vehicles have been pre-registered online, making toll collection easier.

“That may not be a measure of future demand,” Cummings said. “What it does show is that people want to save money.”

Vehicle owners get toll discounts for leasing transponders and for pre-registering.

Even with initial indications of heavy use of the new bridge, drivers shouldn’t expect tolls to drop. TransLink needs the revenue to pay for the $1-billion bridge — a debt it hopes to pay off by 2041. Revenues will also support the operation and maintenance of the bridge.

The biggest payments will go to the Golden Crossing General Partnership, the body responsible for the building, operation and maintenance of the bridge. It is wholly owned by the German Bilfinger-Berger Project Investments.

The steep payment schedule will see TransLink forking over $500,000 per month in the first six months and $1.5 million a month for the next six months. That jumps to $3 million a month the following year and $4 million a month for the three years after that. After five years, TransLink will be paying $4.7 million a month.

The payments are linked to anticipated increases in bridge traffic.

TransLink predicts that for the next few years, 30,000 to 50,000 vehicles will cross the bridge daily, bringing in revenues of $30 million to $50 million a year.

By 2035, it hopes 70,000 to 90,000 vehicles will be crossing every day, bringing in an annual $65 million to $90 million.

If these targets aren’t met, the transit authority will still be on the hook for repaying Golden Crossing at the pre-set rates.

“If we exceed the forecast, we keep the money,” said TransLink spokesman Ken Hardie. “If we don’t make it, we will subsidize it with our general revenue.”

TransLink’s revenues come from transit fares, fuel taxes, property taxes, and parking sales tax. According to Hardie, the transportation authority would be in a position to make those payments if necessary, and had always planned to subsidize the bridge for the first few years.

TransLink could also create incentives for drivers crossing the bridge to close a revenue gap.

“If traffic doesn’t occur, we’ll have to make adjustments to the tolls to make the bridge more attractive to people,” Cummings said. Adjustments could include off-peak pricing and variable rates.

While it’s still early, some TransLink officials were hopeful the high initial numbers bode well.

“If we are doing better than we forecast, then that’s great,” Hardie said. “If a lower subsidy is needed and if there’s a profit then that’s great and it goes back into the system and pays for something else.”

Meanwhile, the number of crossings at the Albion Ferry, which is set to close July 31, dropped by 46 per cent last week.

rtebrake@vancouversun.com

© Copyright © The Vancouver Sun

So, if I'm reading this right... the only way for Translink to make money on this bridge is to double the vehicle traffic going across it over the next few years. A fantastic goal for a PUBLIC TRANSIT COMPANY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if I'm reading this right... the only way for Translink to make money on this bridge is to double the vehicle traffic going across it over the next few years. A fantastic goal for a PUBLIC TRANSIT COMPANY.

lol increase Vehicle traffic on the Port Mann and Golden Ears, so much for the green plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if I'm reading this right... the only way for Translink to make money on this bridge is to double the vehicle traffic going across it over the next few years. A fantastic goal for a PUBLIC TRANSIT COMPANY.

ACTUALLY, Translink is pretty unique as it's responsible not only for transit but ALSO ROADS in the region. Why is it like that? Ask the NDP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ well, there have been something like 50 deaths on SkyTrain? (and thankfully, none involving trains crashing into each other (yet) because of the reliability of LIM and automation technology). And something 6 of those deaths are accidental and the remaining are suicides.

I think platform doors would be a nice feature, but because we use two different models of trains (the Mark I and Mark II) we can't have platform doors as the doors would open at different locations on the platform. Translink has plans to use the majority of the Mark I's until 2034.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ well, there have been something like 50 deaths on SkyTrain? (and thankfully, none involving trains crashing into each other (yet) because of the reliability of LIM and automation technology). And something 6 of those deaths are accidental and the remaining are suicides.

I think platform doors would be a nice feature, but because we use two different models of trains (the Mark I and Mark II) we can't have platform doors as the doors would open at different locations on the platform. Translink has plans to use the majority of the Mark I's until 2034.

How about we design platform doors that are suitable for both MK I and MK II models of trains? We could create platform doors that can open anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about we design platform doors that are suitable for both MK I and MK II models of trains? We could create platform doors that can open anywhere.

Never been done anywhere, and obviously $$$.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Canada line opens on Aug. 1st, what about the bus service improvements?

same date as well?!

Doubt it, since it would cause chaos for the bus drivers working these 4 months.

Usually, they get assigned to routes in every 4 months, so the next rotation will be in Sept. Labor day weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...