Vancouver Canucks 30 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yete Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I don't get the point of this thread..... playoffs can never be about statistics like these its about momentum and working hard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I don't get the point of this thread..... playoffs can never be about statistics like these its about momentum and working hard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common sense Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Not surprising at all. How many first-round exits has this team gotten? Even if the series went the full 7 games, the record would be 3-4. Now let's look at the 2nd round exits - guaranteed to win at least 4 games, but also lose 4 in the process. Most likely, the record for a 2nd round loss would be at .500 What I'm trying to say is that because of the sheer amount of early exits by the Canucks since '95, the numbers will average out to a .500 record. Being home or away has no significance in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 If you are going to use stats, then you should only use them from the years the core of this team has played through. Our record in 95-96 makes no impact at all on the present. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferlands_Head Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 With our current core: Home : 15-13 .536 Away: 13-11 .542 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spliced Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Boston is most disappointing in the sense that if they won game 7 they would have won the cup. But you could see that one coming since the team couldn't score and their defence was in major trouble without Hamuis among other things. The loss to Minnesota was a total joke, Vancouver were the superior team but Cloutier was terrible and they blew what should have been a series win. Not only that they had a pretty easy Ducks team in the next round and a pretty reasonable shot at winning the cup against New Jersey. This was Naslund/Bert/Jovo/Mo/Ohlund's etc chance to win, this was their 94 or 11 but they stunk things up so bad they choked to Minnesota. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newsflash Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Maybe if Vancouver was as an intimidating a place to play as Boston... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#2 Ohlund Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I don't get the point of this thread..... playoffs can never be about statistics like these its about momentum and working hard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.