Likewise Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Link to stream? we're not that professional anyways no one recorded (mfw) but Westminster beat Zimbabwe 4-0 Team- 3g 1a VC- 1a Nadal- 1g 1a iws - 0g 2a Link to comment
Lil B From The Pack Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Not happy about rules being changed mid play What rules? Link to comment
Spoderman Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 we're not that professional anyways no one recorded (mfw) but Westminster beat Zimbabwe 4-0 Spoderman- 3g 1a VC- 1a Nadal- 1g 1a iws - 0g 2a FTFY Link to comment
Spoderman Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 gooby pls Sad face. It's okay, I already got one Link to comment
Otis Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I think I had around 20 saves, 3 goals against, formy had 2 shots, one goal against, vc had about 8 shots, no goals against. Link to comment
Lil B From The Pack Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I think I had around 20 saves, 3 goals against, formy had 2 shots, one goal against, vc had about 8 shots, no goals against. Don't leave me in net again Link to comment
Otis Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Don't leave me in net again Being goalie for Zimbabwe isn't the most fun job eh Link to comment
logic Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Didn't really like the fact that we changed 3v3 to 4v4 when IWS showed up after the second half started. I wouldn't of had a problem with subbing someone off for him but this really made the game unfair. Link to comment
canucklax Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Never asked for permission either, just went and did it. Not classy after the game either, talking crap about when we beat you guys, that we didn't deserve to win the game. Link to comment
Kazmanian Devil Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Switching the amount of players mid-game has been done before during Huntsville vs. Bangkok with no objections. And I fail to see how it's "unfair". Link to comment
logic Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Switching the amount of players mid-game has been done before during Huntsville vs. Bangkok with no objections. And I fail to see how it's "unfair". IWS is a top 3 player in the league, so its obviously unfair when you get to randomly add him.... Link to comment
*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS* Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Was just going to comment on the "unfair" part, what does that even mean IWS is part of our team regardless if he is an all star or not Its not like we put him in and left your team at 3 players you guys also had 4 playing Link to comment
canucklax Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Was just going to comment on the "unfair" part, what does that even mean IWS is part of our team regardless if he is an all star or not Its not like we put him in and left your team at 3 players you guys also had 4 playing The game was started 3v3, that's how it should end. Sub him in if you want, but to change the rules of the game, without even asking the other team is classless Link to comment
*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS* Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 IWS is a top 3 player in the league, so its obviously unfair when you get to randomly add him.... What do you mean randomly adding him he is on our team, lol Its not like we picked him up from PHL and asked him to play so we could win Link to comment
JE14 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 IWS is a top 3 player in the league, so its obviously unfair when you get to randomly add him.... The rules state 4v4 gameplay so for you to play 3v3 could be seen as "unfair". Link to comment
canucklax Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Switching the amount of players mid-game has been done before during Huntsville vs. Bangkok with no objections. And I fail to see how it's "unfair". Was yours in the middle of play, or consensual? Link to comment
canucklax Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 The rules state 4v4 gameplay so for you to play 3v3 could be seen as "unfair". We agreed to a delayed start time and 3v3 because they were shorthanded. Then when they get their top player, they change the game rules... Link to comment
*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS* Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 The game was started 3v3, that's how it should end. Sub him in if you want, but to change the rules of the game, without even asking the other team is classless That is all fine and we could of done that but honestly it wouldn't of made a difference Even in the chat I said we will start at 8:05pm and if IWS shows up we will put him in, there seemed to be no objections then Link to comment
JE14 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 We agreed to a delayed start time and 3v3 because they were shorthanded. Then when they get their top player, they change the game rules... What was the score when he came in and how many goals did he get? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.