Gretzky_Sedins Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 Well I have been posting in other topics and well people liked the ideas so here are a few trades i would make: Trade 1 Trade for Evander Kane To canucks Kane To Winnipeg Markstrom Hansen Higgins Gaunce/Shinkaruk 2nd round pick we do this so it brings us a legit top 6 player that can score 30-35 goals so that will cover kesler scoring They do this so they get a young goalie that they can develop into a number, they get either Hansen or higgins which will cover up the scoring kane had, not right away but slowly, then they get the prospect which is either Gaunce who may be able to step in right away on the 3rd line or a future top 6 scorer. obvious this doesn't make there team great now but in the long run they get the players that can score and a future starting tender which they don't have. they also get a 2nd round pick which could be anything. Trade 2 Trade for Eriksson Although we have Vrbata now. To Boston 4th round pick To Vancouver Eriksson we do this so we get a player in Eriksson that will and has had instant chemistry with the Sedins if Vrbata doesn't they do this so they unload a 4.8 million contract to start signing all there RFA which will want a raise. Trade 3 Trade Burrows To Montreal Burrows To Canucks 2nd round pick we simply do this as a Cap dump and montreal may be one of the places He may be willing to waive to we also get 2nd round pick that would be a low 2nd rounder they do this so they get a big scorer (although he had an off year) and they have him that can play any where from the 1st to 3rd line Final Line up: 2014-2015 line up Sedin Sedin Vrbata Kane Bonino Eriksson Jensen Vey Kassian Sestito Richardson Dorsett Hamhuis Bieksa Edler Tanev Corrado Sbisa Miller Lack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jiggs50 Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 It would have to be Hansen, Tanev, 2016 1st, Gaunce... Eriksonn deal won't happen cause Burrows doesn't waive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksFan25 Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 It would have to be Hansen, Tanev, 2016 1st, Gaunce... Eriksonn deal won't happen cause Burrows doesn't waive.why won't burrows waive to Montreal? He is from Quebec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 Montreal has zero need for Burrows and his cap hit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gretzky_Sedins Posted July 3, 2014 Author Share Posted July 3, 2014 Montreal has zero need for Burrows and his cap hit how? they will play him with Desharnais and Bourque Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 how? they will play him with Desharnais and Bourque The fact that you think Desharnais and Bourque play on the same line shows you know nothing about their lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gretzky_Sedins Posted July 3, 2014 Author Share Posted July 3, 2014 The fact that you think Desharnais and Bourque play on the same line shows you know nothing about their lineup. sorry was going through Cap geek, he will be playing with the 3rd line which will add depth scoring for the canadians Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 sorry was going through Cap geek, he will be playing with the 3rd line which will add depth scoring for the canadians And why would they want to pay a third liner $4.5m a year when they need to re-sign Subban and Eller this year and Galchenyuk and Gallagher next year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slappipappi Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 You think that a 4th rounder for Ericsson is the best they could get? If the Jets trade Kane, they'll want one premium player back for him at least, not a bunch of junk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.