SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME Posted July 31, 2014 Share Posted July 31, 2014 Linden states the Canucks are done on the free agent market so I wouldn't expect Vancouver to sign him. Hayes would be a good fit in Vancouver but I don't see it happening. And we know to always trust the word of Trevor Linden. Especially in the midst of any potential contract scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted July 31, 2014 Share Posted July 31, 2014 You can't use 'all of the above' if you've listed TWO things. Don't ruin 'all of the above' for the rest of us you umbrella Would you prefer I said "A and B" or "both of the above"? I'm glad that's your one comment in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BanTSN Posted July 31, 2014 Share Posted July 31, 2014 Why exactly would it be a Gillis move? I think just about every GM would want a free prospect but Hayes will only be interested in teams which have weak depth so he will have an easier time making the NHL. The hype job over whatshisface castoff prospect from Chicago a few years ago. Who? Oh yeah... Billy Sweatt. Whoopdee do. Alright, alright, I suppose we got Tanev as a free prospect. So there's that. And it's not like Hayes is a write-off just yet. But i'd like to be in Chicago's shoes where they can just supply the league full of castoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-SN- Posted July 31, 2014 Share Posted July 31, 2014 http://forum.canucks.com/topic/359026-report-kevin-hayes/?hl=hayes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.