Canucklehead73 Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Was my one issue with drafting Joulevi... Sergachev might have been that comrade for Tryamkin, would have been a dynamite pairing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ojibwa72 Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 On 1/3/2018 at 5:13 PM, Canucklehead73 said: Was my one issue with drafting Joulevi... Sergachev might have been that comrade for Tryamkin, would have been a dynamite pairing. Yes it definitely would have been the better choice looking back. By the looks of it would have been a real nasty 1-2 punch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calvin's Dog Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 I am curious to know if people on here would think if signing both would be a good idea? I think it would be but the question is always money and term. I am not hockey knowledgeable but if there were four other d with mobility and puck moving capability wouldn’t two big mean d like Try and Guddy be a great thing to have in a deep playoff run? They would just wear down other team’s forwards over 7 games. I know regular season it seems all about mobility like Nashville,but Nashville couldn’t quite get it done. I could see a guy like Gubranson really coming to play hard every playoff game. I think he has another level which is what a team needs of course. so what is too much? Is 5.5 million over 6 years too much for Canucks and not enough for Gudbranson? i think if Try came back Canucks would be smart to overpay on a bridge deal, say 4.5 for 2 years to attract him back. I wonder if Canucks sign Gudbranson not knowing if Tryamkin will ever come back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.