kloubek Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 On 2/20/2018 at 4:07 PM, garthsbutcher said: No one wants Gaunce in any package. Id go Hutton and Vanek for Jenner and then hope to sign Vanek in the summer. I'd do that. Not sure they'd move him for that package though... we'd have to at least throw in a later pick, and even still the only way they would consider it is if they felt Jenner won't rebound from a declining output, AND they feel Hutton still has potential. (His stock isn't exactly high right now) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 On 2/19/2018 at 1:58 PM, Yotes said: Jenner is being used differently under Torts then prior so his pt totals have dipped On 2/19/2018 at 10:29 PM, canuckmen84 said: I like this deal, I'm not sure if Gaunce does anything for CBJ though, other then add depth. Has something happened to the dictionary? I really don't get why this seems so widespread. 'Then' and 'than' mean completely different things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeydownUnder Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 3 minutes ago, Hutton Wink said: Has something happened to the dictionary? I really don't get why this is seems so widespread. 'Then' and 'than' mean completely different things. I don't know about the dictionary but this sentence is not grammatically correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckmen84 Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 2 hours ago, Hutton Wink said: I really don't get why this is seems so widespread. Why are you judging people's spelling when you can't even put a sentence together. Worry about your own posts ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 On 2/21/2018 at 8:25 AM, laddie said: Columbus has stated that they are looking for help with their power play and I don’t believe Granlund or Virtanen fill that need. sam gagner! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 11 hours ago, Hutton Wink said: Has something happened to the dictionary? I really don't get why this is seems so widespread. 'Then' and 'than' mean completely different things. simple oversight, but you can put your dictionary crown on and edit all our mistakes if you'd like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laddie Posted February 23, 2018 Author Share Posted February 23, 2018 29 minutes ago, Yotes said: sam gagner! I contemplated Gagner as part of a trade, but considering they decided not to resign him, I don’t know why they would now trade assets to get him. In addition, his power play stats this year are very underwhelming. Hopefully my grammar, spelling and punctuation meet everyone’s criteria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 22 minutes ago, laddie said: I contemplated Gagner as part of a trade, but considering they decided not to resign him, I don’t know why they would now trade assets to get him. In addition, his power play stats this year are very underwhelming. Hopefully my grammar, spelling and punctuation meet everyone’s criteria Too many spaces after the period and Hopefully! haha Hard to think they want Gagner, but if they are underwhelming on the PP maybe they consider it? Doubtful we move Gagner this year though. Maybe Vanek is an option to help their PP out, no term attached to his deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeydownUnder Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 7 hours ago, Yotes said: Too many spaces after the period and Hopefully! haha Hard to think they want Gagner, but if they are underwhelming on the PP maybe they consider it? Doubtful we move Gagner this year though. Maybe Vanek is an option to help their PP out, no term attached to his deal I think Vanek would be an ideal fit in Columbus. He can bump Anderson or Jenner off of the 2nd power play. With Zack Werenski on that 2nd unit, you think they would be able to get a few more points out of them. Doubt Columbus wants to make a big deal. Vanek would be an fit and come cheap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 20 hours ago, HockeydownUnder said: I don't know about the dictionary but this sentence is not grammatically correct Ha, tried editing or rewording... even proofread! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian42 Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 I agre with consensus Jenner is a great target but original proposal is not enough. Baer & Hutton for jenner and a prospect would be great IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.