-
Posts
3,476 -
Joined
-
Last visited
JustABandwagoner's Achievements
Canucks Third-Line (8/14)
1.9k
Reputation
Single Status Update
See all updates by JustABandwagoner
-
IF we pick either 6 or 7 (8 may happen but 9 WONT happen for sure). I will be happy if its Boqvist, Hughes, Wahlstrom or Tkachuk. In fact.. anyone BUT Bouchard plzzz.
- Show previous comments 6 more
-
@DontMessMe - I think you misunderstand the phrase "literally impossible". Its "literally impossible" that the Canucks pick 10th OA. It is "extremely unlikely" that the Canucks pick 9th OA.
Dahlin > Svechnikov > Zadina > Hughes > Tkachuk > Boqvist > Dobson > Wahlstrom > Bouchard
I personally do not want Tkachuk, Boqvist, or Bouchard.
I don't really get the love affair that people have with Bouchard. The guy is SLOW. The new NHL is all about speed and transition, not something that Bouchard is strong with. Not to mention that Bouchard is overly mature for the league he plays in which has had a direct impact on his point production. I think he has the lowest ceiling of the other D in the top 10 and has high bust potential (although not as much bust potential as Boqvist). -
@Fateless I firmly believe that you misunderstood my intention of saying "literally impossible.". I understand that there is a ~2% chance of picking 9th I think. What I meant to convey by stating "literally impossible" is that I was trying to make a "hyperbolic statement."